325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25187202)
1. Cellular damage suffered by equine embryos after exposure to cryoprotectants or cryopreservation by slow-freezing or vitrification.
Hendriks WK; Roelen BA; Colenbrander B; Stout TA
Equine Vet J; 2015 Nov; 47(6):701-7. PubMed ID: 25187202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of cell loss after vitrification or slow-freezing on further in vitro development and implantation of human Day 3 embryos.
Van Landuyt L; Van de Velde H; De Vos A; Haentjens P; Blockeel C; Tournaye H; Verheyen G
Hum Reprod; 2013 Nov; 28(11):2943-9. PubMed ID: 24014599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vitrifying expanded equine embryos collapsed by blastocoel aspiration is less damaging than slow-freezing.
Umair M; Beitsma M; de Ruijter-Villani M; Deelen C; Herrera C; Stout TAE; Claes A
Theriogenology; 2023 May; 202():28-35. PubMed ID: 36893660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultra-Structural Alterations in In Vitro Produced Four-Cell Bovine Embryos Following Controlled Slow Freezing or Vitrification.
Cavusoglu T; Popken J; Guengoer T; Yilmaz O; Uyanikgil Y; Ates U; Baka M; Oztas E; Zakhartchenko V
Anat Histol Embryol; 2016 Aug; 45(4):291-307. PubMed ID: 26293816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Survival of vitrified in vitro-produced bovine embryos after a one-step warming in-straw cryoprotectant dilution procedure.
Caamaño JN; Gómez E; Trigal B; Muñoz M; Carrocera S; Martín D; Díez C
Theriogenology; 2015 Mar; 83(5):881-90. PubMed ID: 25542458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of different cryopreservation methods for horse and donkey embryos.
Pérez-Marín CC; Vizuete G; Vazquez-Martinez R; Galisteo JJ
Equine Vet J; 2018 May; 50(3):398-404. PubMed ID: 29105954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of conventional freezing and vitrification with dimethylformamide and ethylene glycol for cryopreservation of ovine embryos.
Varago FC; Moutacas VS; Carvalho BC; Serapião RV; Vieira F; Chiarini-Garcia H; Brandão FZ; Camargo LS; Henry M; Lagares MA
Reprod Domest Anim; 2014 Oct; 49(5):839-44. PubMed ID: 25131414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vitrification of cleavage stage day 3 embryos results in higher live birth rates than conventional slow freezing: a RCT.
Debrock S; Peeraer K; Fernandez Gallardo E; De Neubourg D; Spiessens C; D'Hooghe TM
Hum Reprod; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1820-30. PubMed ID: 26089301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Vitrification and the use of high concentrations of cryoprotectants: is it a justified argument to prefer slow freezing?].
Vanderzwalmen P; Zech N; Lejeune B; Wirtleitner B; Zech M; Ectors F
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2010 Sep; 38(9):536-40. PubMed ID: 20800528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of slow freezing and vitrification on embryo development in domestic cat.
Mokrousova VI; Okotrub KA; Brusentsev EY; Kizilova EA; Surovtsev NV; Amstislavsky SY
Reprod Domest Anim; 2020 Oct; 55(10):1328-1336. PubMed ID: 33617098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative study between slow freezing and vitrification of mouse embryos using different cryoprotectants.
Liu WX; Luo MJ; Huang P; Yue LM; Wang L; Zhao CY; He YP; Zhang JH; Zheng Y
Reprod Domest Anim; 2009 Oct; 44(5):788-91. PubMed ID: 18992080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized controlled study of human Day 3 embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing or vitrification: vitrification is associated with higher survival, metabolism and blastocyst formation.
Balaban B; Urman B; Ata B; Isiklar A; Larman MG; Hamilton R; Gardner DK
Hum Reprod; 2008 Sep; 23(9):1976-82. PubMed ID: 18544577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lower intracellular concentration of cryoprotectants after vitrification than after slow freezing despite exposure to higher concentration of cryoprotectant solutions.
Vanderzwalmen P; Connan D; Grobet L; Wirleitner B; Remy B; Vanderzwalmen S; Zech N; Ectors FJ
Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2101-10. PubMed ID: 23592220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laser-assisted vitrification of large equine embryos.
Scherzer J; Davis C; Hurley DJ
Reprod Domest Anim; 2011 Dec; 46(6):1104-6. PubMed ID: 21535240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vitrification of Equine In Vivo-Derived Embryos After Blastocoel Aspiration.
Herrera C
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2180():517-522. PubMed ID: 32797431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Different chromatin and energy/redox responses of mouse morulae and blastocysts to slow freezing and vitrification.
Somoskoi B; Martino NA; Cardone RA; Lacalandra GM; Dell'Aquila ME; Cseh S
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2015 Mar; 13():22. PubMed ID: 25889099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of different cryopreservation techniques: higher survival and implantation rate of frozen-thawed mouse pronuclear embryos in the presence of beta-mercaptoethanol in post-thaw culture.
Bagis H; Akkoc T; Taskin C; Arat S
Reprod Domest Anim; 2010 Dec; 45(6):e332-7. PubMed ID: 20074321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mitochondrial bioenergetic profiles of warmed bovine blastocysts are typically altered after cryopreservation by slow freezing and vitrification.
Kurzella J; Miskel D; Rings F; Tholen E; Tesfaye D; Schellander K; Salilew-Wondim D; Held-Hoelker E; Große-Brinkhaus C; Hoelker M
Theriogenology; 2024 Jan; 214():21-32. PubMed ID: 37839094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of warming method on embryo quality in a simplified equine embryo vitrification system.
Canesin HS; Ortiz I; Rocha Filho AN; Salgado RM; Brom-de-Luna JG; Hinrichs K
Theriogenology; 2020 Jul; 151():151-158. PubMed ID: 32361181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of genotype on the efficiency of mouse embryo cryopreservation by vitrification or slow freezing methods.
Dinnyés A; Wallace GA; Rall WF
Mol Reprod Dev; 1995 Apr; 40(4):429-35. PubMed ID: 7598908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
