These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2518746)
1. [Comparative investigation of compressive resistance of glass-cermet cements used as a core material in post-core systems]. Ersoy E; Cetiner S; Koçak F Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1989 Sep; 16(3):413-7. PubMed ID: 2518746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro fatigue resistance of glass ionomer cements used in post-and-core applications. Gateau P; Sabek M; Dailey B J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Aug; 86(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 11514801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative study of the physical properties of core materials. Saygili G; Mahmali SM Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Aug; 22(4):355-63. PubMed ID: 12212682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Occlusal glass ionomer cermet, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations: a 2-year clinical study. Lidums A; Wilkie R; Smales R Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 7803005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Class II glass ionomer/silver cermet restorations and their effect on interproximal growth of mutans streptococci. Berg JH; Farrell JE; Brown LR Pediatr Dent; 1990 Feb; 12(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 2119036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture resistance of five pin-retained core build-up materials on teeth with and without extracoronal preparation. Burke FJ; Shaglouf AG; Combe EC; Wilson NH Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 11203847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture strength of three different core materials in combination with three different endodontic posts. Cohen BI; Condos S; Deutsch AS; Musikant BL Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(2):178-82. PubMed ID: 8003200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro evaluation of five core materials. Gu S; Rasimick BJ; Deutsch AS; Musikant BL J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 17244304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cermet--an ideal core material for posterior teeth? Burke FJ; Watts DC Dent Update; 1990 Nov; 17(9):364-70. PubMed ID: 2097238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the retention of 5 core materials supported by a dental post. Gu S; Isidro M; Deutsch AS; Musikant BL Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(2):183-4. PubMed ID: 16602368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cuspal reinforcement in primary teeth: an in vitro comparison of three restorative materials. Donly KJ; Wild T; Jensen ME Pediatr Dent; 1988 Jun; 10(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 2978625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a new glass ionomer cement with silver as a core buildup under a cast restoration. Taleghani M; Leinfelder KF Quintessence Int; 1988 Jan; 19(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 2978597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Class II glass ionomer cermet tunnel, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations over 2 years. Wilkie R; Lidums A; Smales R Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 7803004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Materials used in prefabricated post and core systems. A review of the literature. Artopoulou II; O'Keefe KL Tex Dent J; 2006 Apr; 123(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 16761651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative study of plaque mutans streptococci levels in children receiving glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations. Ertuğrul F; Eltem R; Eronat C J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 12762601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of a new glass ionomer cement "visible light cured" as a core buildup under a cast restoration. Jabbar FA; Eskander ME Egypt Dent J; 1993 Jan; 39(1):375-80. PubMed ID: 8299538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]