214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25188602)
1. The 5-year cost-effectiveness of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and cervical disc replacement: a Markov analysis.
McAnany SJ; Overley S; Baird EO; Cho SK; Hecht AC; Zigler JE; Qureshi SA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Nov; 39(23):1924-33. PubMed ID: 25188602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness analysis: comparing single-level cervical disc replacement and single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.
Qureshi SA; McAnany S; Goz V; Koehler SM; Hecht AC
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Nov; 19(5):546-54. PubMed ID: 24010896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The 5-year cost-effectiveness of two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion or cervical disc replacement: a Markov analysis.
Overley SC; McAnany SJ; Brochin RL; Kim JS; Merrill RK; Qureshi SA
Spine J; 2018 Jan; 18(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 28673826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Seven-Year Cost-Effectiveness of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Markov Analysis.
Kim JS; Dowdell J; Cheung ZB; Arvind V; Sun L; Jandhyala C; Ukogu C; Ranson W; Jacobs S; McAnany S; Cho SK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Nov; 43(22):1543-1551. PubMed ID: 29642136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is anterior cervical fusion with a porous tantalum implant a cost-effective method to treat cervical disc disease with radiculopathy?
Fernández-Fairen M; Murcia A; Torres A; Hernández-Vaquero D; Menzie AM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Sep; 37(20):1734-41. PubMed ID: 22466632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Seven-year cost-effectiveness of ProDisc-C total disc replacement: results from investigational device exemption and post-approval studies.
Radcliff K; Lerner J; Yang C; Bernard T; Zigler JE
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 May; 24(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26824587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is Two-level Cervical Disc Replacement More Cost-effective Than Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion at 7 Years?
Merrill RK; McAnany SJ; Albert TJ; Qureshi SA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 May; 43(9):610-616. PubMed ID: 28816825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of cervical total disc replacement vs fusion for the treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease.
Ament JD; Yang Z; Nunley P; Stone MB; Kim KD
JAMA Surg; 2014 Dec; 149(12):1231-9. PubMed ID: 25321869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Health state utility of patients with single-level cervical degenerative disc disease: comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with cervical disc arthroplasty.
Qureshi S; Goz V; McAnany S; Cho SK; Hecht AC; Delamarter RB; Fehlings MG
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 May; 20(5):475-9. PubMed ID: 24559462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anterior surgical management of single-level cervical disc disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Lewis DJ; Attiah MA; Malhotra NR; Burnett MG; Stein SC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Dec; 39(25):2084-92. PubMed ID: 25271510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion five years after surgery.
Carreon LY; Anderson PA; Traynelis VC; Mummaneni PV; Glassman SD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Mar; 38(6):471-5. PubMed ID: 22986842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost Utility Analysis of the Cervical Artificial Disc vs Fusion for the Treatment of 2-Level Symptomatic Degenerative Disc Disease: 5-Year Follow-up.
Ament JD; Yang Z; Nunley P; Stone MB; Lee D; Kim KD
Neurosurgery; 2016 Jul; 79(1):135-45. PubMed ID: 26855020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between cervical total disc replacement and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion of 1 to 2 levels from 2002 to 2009.
Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Fineberg SJ; Singh K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jan; 39(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 24108292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical spondylosis.
Angevine PD; Zivin JG; McCormick PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Sep; 30(17):1989-97. PubMed ID: 16135991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Cost Effectiveness of Polyetheretheketone (PEEK) Cages for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.
Virk SS; Elder JB; Sandhu HS; Khan SN
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Oct; 28(8):E482-92. PubMed ID: 24662283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. ProDisc-C and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as surgical treatment for single-level cervical symptomatic degenerative disc disease: five-year results of a Food and Drug Administration study.
Zigler JE; Delamarter R; Murrey D; Spivak J; Janssen M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Feb; 38(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 23080427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trends in resource utilization and rate of cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion throughout the United States from 2006 to 2013.
Saifi C; Fein AW; Cazzulino A; Lehman RA; Phillips FM; An HS; Riew KD
Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):1022-1029. PubMed ID: 29128581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Management of unilateral cervical radiculopathy in the military: the cost effectiveness of posterior cervical foraminotomy compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
Tumialán LM; Ponton RP; Gluf WM
Neurosurg Focus; 2010 May; 28(5):E17. PubMed ID: 20568933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Thirty-day readmission and reoperation rates after single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus those after cervical disc replacement.
Bhashyam N; De la Garza Ramos R; Nakhla J; Nasser R; Jada A; Purvis TE; Sciubba DM; Kinon MD; Yassari R
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Feb; 42(2):E6. PubMed ID: 28142261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Utilization trends of cervical artificial disc replacement after FDA approval compared with anterior cervical fusion: adoption of new technology.
Lu Y; McAnany SJ; Hecht AC; Cho SK; Qureshi SA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Feb; 39(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 24253777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
