These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25189847)

  • 1. A new approach for optimization of small-scale RO membrane using artificial groundwater.
    Garg MC; Joshi H
    Environ Technol; 2014; 35(21-24):2988-99. PubMed ID: 25189847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response surface methodology and artificial neural network modelling for the performance evaluation of pilot-scale hybrid nanofiltration (NF) & reverse osmosis (RO) membrane system for the treatment of brackish ground water.
    Srivastava A; K A; Nair A; Ram S; Agarwal S; Ali J; Singh R; Garg MC
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Jan; 278(Pt 1):111497. PubMed ID: 33130432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A systematic approach towards optimization of brackish groundwater treatment using nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) hybrid membrane filtration system.
    Srivastava A; Singh R; Rajput VD; Minkina T; Agarwal S; Garg MC
    Chemosphere; 2022 Sep; 303(Pt 3):135230. PubMed ID: 35688189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A complementary approach of response surface methodology and an artificial neural network for the optimization and prediction of low salinity reverse osmosis performance.
    Brooke R; Fan L; Khayet M; Wang X
    Heliyon; 2022 Sep; 8(9):e10692. PubMed ID: 36185130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unlocking groundwater desalination potential for agriculture with fertilizer drawn forward osmosis: prediction and performance optimization via RSM and ANN.
    Elgharbi S; Boubakri A; Bouguecha S; Chemingui S; Alanazy HD; Hafiane A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Jul; 31(31):43660-43672. PubMed ID: 38904877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inorganic fouling mitigation by salinity cycling in batch reverse osmosis.
    Warsinger DM; Tow EW; Maswadeh LA; Connors GB; Swaminathan J; Lienhard V JH
    Water Res; 2018 Jun; 137():384-394. PubMed ID: 29573825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reverse osmosis desalination: water sources, technology, and today's challenges.
    Greenlee LF; Lawler DF; Freeman BD; Marrot B; Moulin P
    Water Res; 2009 May; 43(9):2317-48. PubMed ID: 19371922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. N-nitrosamine rejection by reverse osmosis membranes: a full-scale study.
    Fujioka T; Khan SJ; McDonald JA; Roux A; Poussade Y; Drewes JE; Nghiem LD
    Water Res; 2013 Oct; 47(16):6141-8. PubMed ID: 24008222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
    Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An investigation of desalination by nanofiltration, reverse osmosis and integrated (hybrid NF/RO) membranes employed in brackish water treatment.
    Talaeipour M; Nouri J; Hassani AH; Mahvi AH
    J Environ Health Sci Eng; 2017; 15():18. PubMed ID: 28736617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selective removal of arsenic and monovalent ions from brackish water reverse osmosis concentrate.
    Xu P; Capito M; Cath TY
    J Hazard Mater; 2013 Sep; 260():885-91. PubMed ID: 23892312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. UTEP-EPW university-utility partnership: Concentrate enhanced-recovery reverse osmosis process for high water recovery from silica-saturated desalination concentrates.
    Tarquin A; Walker WS; Delgado G; Bustamante A
    Water Environ Res; 2020 Mar; 92(3):369-377. PubMed ID: 31276246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vacuum membrane distillation of seawater reverse osmosis brines.
    Mericq JP; Laborie S; Cabassud C
    Water Res; 2010 Oct; 44(18):5260-73. PubMed ID: 20659753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling and optimization of chlorophenol rejection for spiral wound reverse osmosis membrane modules.
    Sivanantham V; Narayana PL; Hyeong KJ; Pareddy P; Sangeetha V; Kyoung-Seok M; In KH; Sung HK; Reddy NS
    Chemosphere; 2021 Apr; 268():129345. PubMed ID: 33360146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fouling characteristics of NF and RO operated for removal of dissolved matter from groundwater.
    Gwon EM; Yu MJ; Oh HK; Ylee YH
    Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(12):2989-97. PubMed ID: 12767302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Full-scale simulation of seawater reverse osmosis desalination processes for boron removal: Effect of membrane fouling.
    Park PK; Lee S; Cho JS; Kim JH
    Water Res; 2012 Aug; 46(12):3796-804. PubMed ID: 22578430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Thermodynamic analysis of osmotic energy recovery at a reverse osmosis desalination plant.
    Feinberg BJ; Ramon GZ; Hoek EM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Mar; 47(6):2982-9. PubMed ID: 23331042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of antifouling reverse osmosis membranes for water treatment: A review.
    Kang GD; Cao YM
    Water Res; 2012 Mar; 46(3):584-600. PubMed ID: 22154112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rejection of organic compounds by ultra-low pressure reverse osmosis membrane.
    Ozaki H; Li H
    Water Res; 2002 Jan; 36(1):123-30. PubMed ID: 11766787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High performance RO membranes for desalination and wastewater reclamation and their operation results.
    Henmi M; Fusaoka Y; Tomioka H; Kurihara M
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(9):2134-40. PubMed ID: 21045342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.