163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25189857)
1. Backscatter coefficient estimation using tapers with gaps.
Luchies AC; Oelze ML
Ultrason Imaging; 2015 Apr; 37(2):117-34. PubMed ID: 25189857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative ultrasonic characterization of diffuse scatterers in the presence of structures that produce coherent echoes.
Luchies AC; Ghoshal G; O'Brien WD; Oelze ML
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 May; 59(5):893-904. PubMed ID: 22622974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Techniques and evaluation from a cross-platform imaging comparison of quantitative ultrasound parameters in an in vivo rodent fibroadenoma model.
Wirtzfeld LA; Nam K; Labyed Y; Ghoshal G; Haak A; Sen-Gupta E; He Z; Hirtz NR; Miller RJ; Sarwate S; Simpson DG; Zagzebski JA; Bigelow TA; Oelze M; Hall TJ; O'Brien WD
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Jul; 60(7):1386-400. PubMed ID: 25004506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of acoustic nonlinearities on the ultrasonic backscatter coefficient estimation.
Coila A; Oelze ML
J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jul; 146(1):85. PubMed ID: 31370607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Trade-offs in data acquisition and processing parameters for backscatter and scatterer size estimations.
Liu W; Zagzebski JA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010; 57(2):340-52. PubMed ID: 20178900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In Vivo Validation of an In Situ Calibration Bead as a Reference for Backscatter Coefficient Calculation.
Zhao Y; Czarnota GJ; Park TH; Miller RJ; Oelze ML
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2024 Jun; 50(6):833-842. PubMed ID: 38471999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interlaboratory comparison of backscatter coefficient estimates for tissue-mimicking phantoms.
Anderson JJ; Herd MT; King MR; Haak A; Hafez ZT; Song J; Oelze ML; Madsen EL; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
Ultrason Imaging; 2010 Jan; 32(1):48-64. PubMed ID: 20690431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimation of Backscatter Coefficients Using an In Situ Calibration Source.
Nguyen TN; Tam AJ; Do MN; Oelze ML
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2020 Feb; 67(2):308-317. PubMed ID: 31567079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of ultrasound attenuation and backscatter estimates in layered tissue-mimicking phantoms among three clinical scanners.
Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Wirtzfeld LA; Ghoshal G; Pawlicki AD; Madsen EL; Lavarello RJ; Oelze ML; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
Ultrason Imaging; 2012 Oct; 34(4):209-21. PubMed ID: 23160474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative ultrasound estimates from populations of scatterers with continuous size distributions: effects of the size estimator algorithm.
Lavarello R; Oelze M
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 Sep; 59(9):2066-76. PubMed ID: 23007782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative assessment of in vivo breast masses using ultrasound attenuation and backscatter.
Nam K; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ
Ultrason Imaging; 2013 Apr; 35(2):146-61. PubMed ID: 23493613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Unifying Concepts of Statistical and Spectral Quantitative Ultrasound Techniques.
Destrempes F; Franceschini E; Yu FT; Cloutier G
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2016 Feb; 35(2):488-500. PubMed ID: 26415165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Frequency dependence of attenuation and backscatter coefficient of ex vivo human lymphedema dermis.
Omura M; Yoshida K; Akita S; Yamaguchi T
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2020 Jan; 47(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 31515646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization of thyroid cancer in mouse models using high-frequency quantitative ultrasound techniques.
Lavarello RJ; Ridgway WR; Sarwate SS; Oelze ML
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2333-41. PubMed ID: 24035621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15.
Zhao Y; Czarnota GJ; Park TH; Miller RJ; Oelze ML
bioRxiv; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38370712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Method for Stereological Determination of the Structure Function From Histological Sections of Isotropic Scattering Media.
Han A
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2018 Jun; 65(6):1007-1016. PubMed ID: 29856718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of differences in backscatter coefficients among four ultrasound scanners with different beamforming methods.
Omura M; Hasegawa H; Nagaoka R; Yoshida K; Yamaguchi T
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2020 Jan; 47(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 31679096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative ultrasound estimates from populations of scatterers with continuous size distributions.
Lavarello R; Oelze M
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 Apr; 58(4):744-53. PubMed ID: 21507752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved scatterer property estimates from ultrasound backscatter using gate-edge correction and a pseudo-Welch technique.
Ghoshal G; Oelze ML
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010 Dec; 57(12):2828-32. PubMed ID: 21156378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the estimation of backscatter coefficients using single-element focused transducers.
Lavarello RJ; Ghoshal G; Oelze ML
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):2903-11. PubMed ID: 21568393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
