163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25189857)
21. Simulation of ultrasonic scattering from scatterer size distributions using Field II.
Whitson HM; Rosado-Mendez IM; Hale JH; Hall TJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Feb; 155(2):1406-1421. PubMed ID: 38364040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. In Vivo Quantitative Ultrasound on Dermis and Hypodermis for Classifying Lymphedema Severity in Humans.
Omura M; Saito W; Akita S; Yoshida K; Yamaguchi T
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2022 Apr; 48(4):646-662. PubMed ID: 35033402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quantitative Ultrasound Comparison of MAT and 4T1 Mammary Tumors in Mice and Rats Across Multiple Imaging Systems.
Wirtzfeld LA; Ghoshal G; Rosado-Mendez IM; Nam K; Park Y; Pawlicki AD; Miller RJ; Simpson DG; Zagzebski JA; Oelze ML; Hall TJ; O'Brien WD
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Aug; 34(8):1373-83. PubMed ID: 26206823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Review of Quantitative Ultrasound: Envelope Statistics and Backscatter Coefficient Imaging and Contributions to Diagnostic Ultrasound.
Oelze ML; Mamou J
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2016 Feb; 63(2):336-51. PubMed ID: 26761606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Experimental application of ultrafast imaging to spectral tissue characterization.
Garcia-Duitama J; Chayer B; Han A; Garcia D; Oelze ML; Cloutier G
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Sep; 41(9):2506-19. PubMed ID: 26119459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Inter-platform reproducibility of ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter coefficients in assessing NAFLD.
Han A; Zhang YN; Boehringer AS; Andre MP; Erdman JW; Loomba R; Sirlin CB; O'Brien WD
Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4699-4708. PubMed ID: 30783789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Improved parametric imaging of scatterer size estimates using angular compounding.
Gerig AL; Varghese T; Zagzebski JA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 Jun; 51(6):708-15. PubMed ID: 15244284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Mean scatterer spacing estimation using multi-taper coherence.
Rubert N; Varghese T
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Jun; 60(6):1061-73. PubMed ID: 25004470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Ultrasonic backscatter coefficient estimation in nonlinear regime using an in situ calibration target.
Coila A; Oelze ML
J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Jun; 151(6):4196. PubMed ID: 35778186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Low Variance Estimation of Backscatter Quantitative Ultrasound Parameters Using Dynamic Programming.
Vajihi Z; Rosado-Mendez IM; Hall TJ; Rivaz H
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2018 Nov; 65(11):2042-2053. PubMed ID: 30222558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cross-imaging system comparison of backscatter coefficient estimates from a tissue-mimicking material.
Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Wirtzfeld LA; Kumar V; Madsen EL; Ghoshal G; Pawlicki AD; Oelze ML; Lavarello RJ; Bigelow TA; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1319-24. PubMed ID: 22978860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Method for estimating total attenuation from a spatial map of attenuation slope for quantitative ultrasound imaging.
Pawlicki AD; O'Brien WD
Ultrason Imaging; 2013 Apr; 35(2):162-72. PubMed ID: 23493614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of adaptive threshold filtering on ultrasonic nakagami parameter to detect variation in scatterer concentration.
Tsui PH; Wan YL; Huang CC; Wang MC
Ultrason Imaging; 2010 Oct; 32(4):229-42. PubMed ID: 21213568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter coefficient estimates of rodent-tumor-mimicking structures: comparison of results among clinical scanners.
Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Wirtzfeld LA; Pawlicki AD; Kumar V; Madsen EL; Ghoshal G; Lavarello RJ; Oelze ML; Bigelow TA; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
Ultrason Imaging; 2011 Oct; 33(4):233-50. PubMed ID: 22518954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Characterizing Fatty Liver in vivo in Rabbits, Using Quantitative Ultrasound.
Nguyen TN; Podkowa AS; Tam AY; Arnold EC; Miller RJ; Park TH; Do MN; Oelze ML
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 45(8):2049-2062. PubMed ID: 31076231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of the precision of spectral backscatter measurements on the estimation of scatterers size in cancellous bone.
Padilla F; Jenson F; Laugier P
Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e57-60. PubMed ID: 16904147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Quantitative ultrasound techniques for assessing thermal ablation: Measurement of the backscatter coefficient from ex vivo human liver.
Rohfritsch A; Franceschini E; Dupré A; Melodelima D
Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 50(11):6908-6919. PubMed ID: 37769022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Task-oriented comparison of power spectral density estimation methods for quantifying acoustic attenuation in diagnostic ultrasound using a reference phantom method.
Rosado-Mendez IM; Nam K; Hall TJ; Zagzebski JA
Ultrason Imaging; 2013 Jul; 35(3):214-34. PubMed ID: 23858055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Improved scatterer size estimation using backscatter coefficient measurements with coded excitation and pulse compression.
Kanzler SG; Oelze ML
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4599-607. PubMed ID: 18537407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A novel coded excitation scheme to improve spatial and contrast resolution of quantitative ultrasound imaging.
Sanchez JR; Pocci D; Oelze ML
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Oct; 56(10):2111-23. PubMed ID: 19942499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
