These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25190064)
1. Psychometrics of the wrist stability and hand mobility subscales of the Fugl-Meyer assessment in moderately impaired stroke. Page SJ; Hade E; Persch A Phys Ther; 2015 Jan; 95(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 25190064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Psychometric properties and administration of the wrist/hand subscales of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment in minimally impaired upper extremity hemiparesis in stroke. Page SJ; Levine P; Hade E Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Dec; 93(12):2373-6.e5. PubMed ID: 22759831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rasch Analysis of the Wrist and Hand Fugl-Meyer: Dimensionality and Item-Level Characteristics. Persch AC; Gugiu PC; Velozo CA; Page SJ J Neurol Phys Ther; 2015 Jul; 39(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 26050075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Giving Them a Hand: Wearing a Myoelectric Elbow-Wrist-Hand Orthosis Reduces Upper Extremity Impairment in Chronic Stroke. Peters HT; Page SJ; Persch A Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2017 Sep; 98(9):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 28130084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Psychometric comparisons of 4 measures for assessing upper-extremity function in people with stroke. Lin JH; Hsu MJ; Sheu CF; Wu TS; Lin RT; Chen CH; Hsieh CL Phys Ther; 2009 Aug; 89(8):840-50. PubMed ID: 19556333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Adult Assisting Hand Assessment Stroke: Psychometric Properties of an Observation-Based Bimanual Upper Limb Performance Measurement. Van Gils A; Meyer S; Van Dijk M; Thijs L; Michielsen M; Lafosse C; Truyens V; Oostra K; Peeters A; Thijs V; Feys H; Krumlinde-Sundholm L; Kos D; Verheyden G Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2018 Dec; 99(12):2513-2522. PubMed ID: 29807004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity and reliability of the chronic composite XA, an upper limb motor assessment using Active Range of Motion in patients with chronic stroke. Jamal K; Butet S; Maitre B; Gracies JM; Hameau S; Leveque LE Bras É; Baude M; Cordillet S; Bonan I Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2024 Aug; 60(4):559-566. PubMed ID: 38958692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Activity-based electrical stimulation training in a stroke patient with minimal movement in the paretic upper extremity. Page SJ; Maslyn S; Hermann VH; Wu A; Dunning K; Levine PG Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2009; 23(6):595-9. PubMed ID: 19095624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity: reliability, responsiveness and validity of the Danish version. Lundquist CB; Maribo T Disabil Rehabil; 2017 May; 39(9):934-939. PubMed ID: 27062881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinically important differences for the upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer Scale in people with minimal to moderate impairment due to chronic stroke. Page SJ; Fulk GD; Boyne P Phys Ther; 2012 Jun; 92(6):791-8. PubMed ID: 22282773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Translation and Initial Validation of the Chinese Version of the Action Research Arm Test in People with Stroke. Zhao JL; Chen PM; Li WF; Bian RH; Ding MH; Li H; Lin Q; Xu ZQ; Mao YR; Huang DF Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():5416560. PubMed ID: 30805366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characterizing upper extremity motor behavior in the first week after stroke. Barth J; Geed S; Mitchell A; Lum PS; Edwards DF; Dromerick AW PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0221668. PubMed ID: 32776927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acceleration metrics are responsive to change in upper extremity function of stroke survivors. Urbin MA; Waddell KJ; Lang CE Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 May; 96(5):854-61. PubMed ID: 25497517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity and reliability of selective control of upper extremity scale (SCUES) in patients with chronic stroke. Boz Sönmez D; Giray E; Atıcı A; Illeez ÖG; Akpınar P; Ünlü Özkan F; Aktaş I Disabil Rehabil; 2024 Oct; 46(20):4813-4824. PubMed ID: 38140918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reaching exercise for chronic paretic upper extremity after stroke using a novel rehabilitation robot with arm-weight support and concomitant electrical stimulation and vibration: before-and-after feasibility trial. Amano Y; Noma T; Etoh S; Miyata R; Kawamura K; Shimodozono M Biomed Eng Online; 2020 May; 19(1):28. PubMed ID: 32375788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Concurrent validity of machine learning-classified functional upper extremity use from accelerometry in chronic stroke. Geed S; Grainger ML; Mitchell A; Anderson CC; Schmaulfuss HL; Culp SA; McCormick ER; McGarry MR; Delgado MN; Noccioli AD; Shelepov J; Dromerick AW; Lum PS Front Physiol; 2023; 14():1116878. PubMed ID: 37035665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing the motor status score: a scale for the evaluation of upper limb motor outcomes in patients after stroke. Ferraro M; Demaio JH; Krol J; Trudell C; Rannekleiv K; Edelstein L; Christos P; Aisen M; England J; Fasoli S; Krebs HI; Hogan N; Volpe BT Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2002 Sep; 16(3):283-9. PubMed ID: 12234090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Paretic upper extremity movement gains are retained 3 months after training with an electrical stimulation neuroprosthesis. Persch AC; Page SJ; Murray C Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Nov; 93(11):2122-5. PubMed ID: 22728015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Depth Sensor-Based Assessment of Reachable Work Space for Visualizing and Quantifying Paretic Upper Extremity Motor Function in People With Stroke. Okuyama K; Kawakami M; Tsuchimoto S; Ogura M; Okada K; Mizuno K; Ushiba J; Liu M Phys Ther; 2020 May; 100(5):870-879. PubMed ID: 32048724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retention of motor changes in chronic stroke survivors who were administered mental practice. Page SJ; Murray C; Hermann V; Levine P Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 Nov; 92(11):1741-5. PubMed ID: 21880300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]