These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25190596)

  • 1. Perpetual conservation easements and landowners: evaluating easement knowledge, satisfaction and partner organization relationships.
    Stroman DA; Kreuter UP
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Dec; 146():284-291. PubMed ID: 25190596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Landowner Satisfaction with the Wetland Reserve Program in Texas: A Mixed-Methods Analysis.
    Stroman D; Kreuter UP
    Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 57(1):97-108. PubMed ID: 26289350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Land management restrictions and options for change in perpetual conservation easements.
    Rissman A; Bihari M; Hamilton C; Locke C; Lowenstein D; Motew M; Price J; Smail R
    Environ Manage; 2013 Jul; 52(1):277-88. PubMed ID: 23784713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of biological monitoring and results outreach on private landowner conservation management.
    Lutter SH; Dayer AA; Heggenstaller E; Larkin JL
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0194740. PubMed ID: 29617388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Classifying private landowners to improve understanding of management decisions and conservation opportunities in urbanizing forested landscapes.
    Balukas JA; Bell KP; Bauer DM
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 232():751-758. PubMed ID: 30529417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Motivations influencing the adoption of conservation easements.
    Farmer JR; Knapp D; Meretsky VJ; Chancellor C; Fischer BC
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Aug; 25(4):827-34. PubMed ID: 21535148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial dependence and determinants of conservation easement adoptions in the United States.
    Lamichhane S; Sun C; Gordon JS; Grado SC; Poudel KP
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Oct; 296():113164. PubMed ID: 34216904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the ecological and social benefits of private land conservation in Colorado.
    Wallace GN; Theobald DM; Ernst T; King K
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Apr; 22(2):284-96. PubMed ID: 18402582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Increasing participation in incentive programs for biodiversity conservation.
    Sorice MG; Oh CO; Gartner T; Snieckus M; Johnson R; Donlan CJ
    Ecol Appl; 2013 Jul; 23(5):1146-55. PubMed ID: 23967582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Willingness of Non-Industrial Private Forest Owners to Enter California's Carbon Offset Market.
    Kelly EC; Gold GJ; Di Tommaso J
    Environ Manage; 2017 Nov; 60(5):882-895. PubMed ID: 28836080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conservation easements: biodiversity protection and private use.
    Rissman AR; Lozier L; Comendant T; Kareiva P; Kiesecker JM; Shaw MR; Merenlender AM
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Jun; 21(3):709-18. PubMed ID: 17531049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Landowner Perceptions of Payments for Nature Conservation on Private Land.
    Yasué M; Kirkpatrick JB; Davison A; Gilfedder L
    Environ Manage; 2019 Sep; 64(3):287-302. PubMed ID: 31359092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of disputes and easement violations on the cost-effectiveness of land conservation.
    Schuster R; Arcese P
    PeerJ; 2015; 3():e1185. PubMed ID: 26413430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changing landowners, changing ecosystem? Land-ownership motivations as drivers of land management practices.
    Sorice MG; Kreuter UP; Wilcox BP; Fox WE
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Jan; 133():144-52. PubMed ID: 24374464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tasmanian landowner preferences for conservation incentive programs: a latent class approach.
    Putten vI; Jennings SM; Louviere JJ; Burgess LB
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Oct; 92(10):2647-56. PubMed ID: 21719189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Motivating landowners to recruit neighbors for private land conservation.
    Niemiec RM; Willer R; Ardoin NM; Brewer FK
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Aug; 33(4):930-941. PubMed ID: 30698291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Thinking Upstream: How Do Landowner Attitudes Affect Forested Riparian Buffer Coverage?
    Armstrong A; Stedman RC
    Environ Manage; 2020 May; 65(5):689-701. PubMed ID: 32086548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The lay of the land: What we know about non-operating agricultural and absentee forest landowners in the U.S. and Europe.
    Fairchild E; Ulrich-Schad JD; Petrzelka P; Ma Z
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Jul; 313():114991. PubMed ID: 35367676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing landowner activities related to birds across rural-to-urban landscapes.
    Lepczyk CA; Mertig AG; Liu J
    Environ Manage; 2004 Jan; 33(1):110-25. PubMed ID: 14749899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interacting Social and Environmental Predictors for the Spatial Distribution of Conservation Lands.
    Baldwin RF; Leonard PB
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140540. PubMed ID: 26465155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.