287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25191840)
1. Skeletal and dental effects of molar distalization using a modified palatal anchorage plate in adolescents.
Sa'aed NL; Park CO; Bayome M; Park JH; Kim Y; Kook YA
Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):657-64. PubMed ID: 25191840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Midpalatal miniscrews and high-pull headgear for anteroposterior and vertical anchorage control: cephalometric comparisons of treatment changes.
Lee J; Miyazawa K; Tabuchi M; Kawaguchi M; Shibata M; Goto S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 23910205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maxillary molar distalization with the indirect Palatal miniscrew for Anchorage and Distalization Appliance (iPANDA).
Suzuki EY; Suzuki B
Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e228-41. PubMed ID: 23646335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy with erupted second molar: Segmented versus Quad Pendulum appliance.
Caprioglio A; Cozzani M; Fontana M
Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):49. PubMed ID: 25139288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Jones jig molar distalization appliance with extraoral traction.
Haydar S; Uner O
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jan; 117(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 10629519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment.
Patel MP; Henriques JF; Freitas KM; Grec RH
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(3):44-51. PubMed ID: 25162565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the zygoma anchorage system with cervical headgear in buccal segment distalization.
Kaya B; Arman A; Uçkan S; Yazici AC
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 19509344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment effects of a modified palatal anchorage plate for distalization evaluated with cone-beam computed tomography.
Kook YA; Bayome M; Trang VT; Kim HJ; Park JH; Kim KB; Behrents RG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jul; 146(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 24974998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Noncompliance maxillary molar distalization with the first class appliance: a randomized controlled trial.
Papadopoulos MA; Melkos AB; Athanasiou AE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):586.e1-586.e13; discussion 586-7. PubMed ID: 20451774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Molar distalization with a pendulum appliance K-loop combination.
Acar AG; Gürsoy S; Dinçer M
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 20231213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Skeletal versus conventional intraoral anchorage for the treatment of class II malocclusion: dentoalveolar and skeletal effects.
Mariani L; Maino G; Caprioglio A
Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):43. PubMed ID: 25138818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study.
Fontana M; Cozzani M; Caprioglio A
Prog Orthod; 2012 May; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 22583585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dental and skeletal components of Class II open bite treatment with a modified Thurow appliance.
Jacob HB; dos Santos-Pinto A; Buschang PH
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 24713556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.
Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differences of treatment outcomes between self-ligating brackets with microimplant and headgear anchorages in adults with bimaxillary protrusion.
Chen M; Li ZM; Liu X; Cai B; Wang DW; Feng ZC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 25836006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative cephalometric study of Class II malocclusion treatment with Pendulum and Jones jig appliances followed by fixed corrective orthodontics.
Patel MP; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; Pinzan A; Janson G; de Freitas MR
Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(6):58-64. PubMed ID: 24351151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intraosseous screw-supported upper molar distalization.
Gelgör IE; Büyükyilmaz T; Karaman AI; Dolanmaz D; Kalayci A
Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):838-50. PubMed ID: 15673149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomized clinical trial comparing control of maxillary anchorage with 2 retraction techniques.
Xu TM; Zhang X; Oh HS; Boyd RL; Korn EL; Baumrind S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):544.e1-9; discussion 544-5. PubMed ID: 21055588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
