294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25191840)
21. Comparison of Treatment Effects with Modified C-Palatal Plates vs Greenfield Molar Distalizer Appliances in Adolescents.
Alfaifi M; Park JH; Tai K; Ku JH; Vaid NR; Kook YA; Shoaib AM; Bayome M
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020; 44(3):202-208. PubMed ID: 32644891
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of tooth displacement between buccal mini-implants and palatal plate anchorage for molar distalization: a finite element study.
Yu IJ; Kook YA; Sung SJ; Lee KJ; Chun YS; Mo SS
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Aug; 36(4):394-402. PubMed ID: 22051536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Hybrid Hyrax Distalizer, a new all-in-one appliance for rapid palatal expansion, early class III treatment and upper molar distalization.
Wilmes B; Ludwig B; Katyal V; Nienkemper M; Rein A; Drescher D
J Orthod; 2014 Sep; 41 Suppl 1():S47-53. PubMed ID: 25138366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Maxillary molar distalization with a bone-anchored pendulum appliance.
Kircelli BH; Pektaş ZO; Kircelli C
Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):650-9. PubMed ID: 16808573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage.
Sar C; Arman-Özçırpıcı A; Uçkan S; Yazıcı AC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):636-49. PubMed ID: 21536207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Efficiency of a skeletonized distal jet appliance supported by miniscrew anchorage for noncompliance maxillary molar distalization.
Kinzinger GS; Gülden N; Yildizhan F; Diedrich PR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):578-86. PubMed ID: 19815162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods.
Bolla E; Muratore F; Carano A; Bowman SJ
Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):481-94. PubMed ID: 12401059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Treatment effects of the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device used with miniscrew anchorage.
Aslan BI; Kucukkaraca E; Turkoz C; Dincer M
Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 23772682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances.
Burkhardt DR; McNamara JA; Baccetti T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Total distalization of the maxillary arch in a patient with skeletal Class II malocclusion.
Choi YJ; Lee JS; Cha JY; Park YC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):823-33. PubMed ID: 21640890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A comparison of the effects of 2 mandibular anchorage systems used with a 3-dimensional bimetric maxillary distalizing arch.
Okay C; Gülsen A; Keykubat A; Ucem TT; Yüksel S
World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 16779970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance.
Bussick TJ; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Mar; 117(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 10715093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Sagittal correction of adolescent patients with modified palatal anchorage plate appliances.
Kook YA; Park JH; Kim Y; Ahn CS; Bayome M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Oct; 148(4):674-84. PubMed ID: 26432323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Treatment effects of the Jasper Jumper and the Bionator associated with fixed appliances.
Neves LS; Janson G; Cançado RH; de Lima KJ; Fernandes TM; Henriques JF
Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):54. PubMed ID: 25182030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of the dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes with the cervical headgear and Jones Jig followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion patients: A retrospective study.
Fontes FPH; Bellini-Pereira SA; Aliaga-Del-Castillo A; Patel MP; Freitas MR; Henriques JFC; Janson G
Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):424-435. PubMed ID: 32278665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A new approach in maxillary molar distalization: intraoral bodily molar distalizer.
Keles A; Sayinsu K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jan; 117(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 10629518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An active, skeletally anchored transpalatal appliance for derotation, distalization and vertical control of maxillary first molars.
Hourfar J; Ludwig B; Kanavakis G
J Orthod; 2014 Sep; 41 Suppl 1():S24-32. PubMed ID: 25138362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A comparison of two maxillary molar distalizing appliances with the distal jet.
Ferguson DJ; Carano A; Bowman SJ; Davis EC; Gutierrez Vega ME; Lee SH
World J Orthod; 2005; 6(4):382-90. PubMed ID: 16379210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
