138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25191888)
1. Development of a morphing technique for predicting the position and size of an artificial ear in hemifacial microsomia patients.
Coward TJ; Richards R; Scott BJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):451-7. PubMed ID: 25191888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of three methods to evaluate the position of an artificial ear on the deficient side of the face from a three-dimensional surface scan of patients with hemifacial microsomia.
Coward TJ; Watson RM; Richards R; Scott BJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(2):160-5. PubMed ID: 22371838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison between computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and laser scanning for capturing 3-dimensional data from a natural ear to aid rehabilitation.
Coward TJ; Scott BJ; Watson RM; Richards R
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(1):92-100. PubMed ID: 16479767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laser scanning of the ear identifying the shape and position in subjects with normal facial symmetry.
Coward TJ; Scott BJ; Watson RM; Richards R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Feb; 29(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 10691137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Identifying the position of an ear from a laser scan: the significance for planning rehabilitation.
Coward TJ; Scott BJ; Watson RM; Richards R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Jun; 31(3):244-51. PubMed ID: 12190128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Precise positioning of an intraoral distractor using augmented reality in patients with hemifacial microsomia.
Qu M; Hou Y; Xu Y; Shen C; Zhu M; Xie L; Wang H; Zhang Y; Chai G
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 43(1):106-12. PubMed ID: 25465484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of cephalometric landmarks with 3-dimensional volumetric computer modeling to position an auricular implant surgical template: a clinical report.
Kolodney H; Swedenburg G; Taylor SS; Carron JD; Schlakman BN
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Nov; 106(5):284-9. PubMed ID: 22024177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CAD/CAM ear model and virtual construction of the mold.
Ciocca L; Mingucci R; Gassino G; Scotti R
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Nov; 98(5):339-43. PubMed ID: 18021820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on facial images captured on a 3D camera.
Othman SA; Ahmad R; Mericant AF; Jamaludin M
Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 23785939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of prosthetic ear models created from data captured by computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and laser scanning.
Coward TJ; Scott BJ; Watson RM; Richards R
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(3):275-85. PubMed ID: 17580460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development and reproducibility of a 3D stereophotogrammetric reference frame for facial soft tissue growth of babies and young children with and without orofacial clefts.
Brons S; van Beusichem ME; Maal TJ; Plooij JM; Bronkhorst EM; Bergé SJ; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 22920646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison study of different facial soft tissue analysis methods.
Kook MS; Jung S; Park HJ; Oh HK; Ryu SY; Cho JH; Lee JS; Yoon SJ; Kim MS; Shin HK
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 24954528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient-specific polyetheretherketone facial implants in a computer-aided planning workflow.
Guevara-Rojas G; Figl M; Schicho K; Seemann R; Traxler H; Vacariu A; Carbon CC; Ewers R; Watzinger F
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 72(9):1801-12. PubMed ID: 24679957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new method for automatic tracking of facial landmarks in 3D motion captured images (4D).
Al-Anezi T; Khambay B; Peng MJ; O'Leary E; Ju X; Ayoub A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 23218511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of maxillary obturator prostheses on facial morphology in patients with unilateral maxillary defects.
Hanawa S; Kitaoka A; Koyama S; Sasaki K
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 25277030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fabrication of a wax ear by rapid-process modeling using stereolithography.
Coward TJ; Watson RM; Wilkinson IC
Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 10196824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Fabricating facial prostheses using CAD/CAM and rapid prototyping technique].
Huang X; Jiao T; Lin Y; Zhang W; Wang C; Zhang F
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Apr; 22(2):320-3. PubMed ID: 15884544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A three-dimensional evaluation of Māori and New Zealand European faces.
Antoun JS; Lawrence C; Leow A; Rongo R; Dias G; Farella M
Aust Orthod J; 2014 Nov; 30(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 25549519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three dimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry after mandibular reconstruction: validation of a new method using stereophotogrammetry.
Verhoeven TJ; Coppen C; Barkhuysen R; Bronkhorst EM; Merkx MA; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 22939875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry in patients with hemifacial microsomia using stereophotogrammetry.
Cassi D; Battistoni G; Magnifico M; Di Blasio C; Pedrazzi G; Di Blasio A
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 47(1):179-184. PubMed ID: 30527381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
