138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25191888)
21. Morphometry of the ear in north Sudanese subjects with Down syndrome: a three-dimensional computerized assessment.
Sforza C; Elamin F; Rosati R; Lucchini MA; De Menezes M; Ferrario VF
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 22(1):297-301. PubMed ID: 21239923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Anatomical Uniqueness of Ear Morphology: A Novel Metrical Approach through Three-Dimensional Superimposition.
Gibelli D; Pucciarelli V; Ferrario VF; Dolci C; Sforza C
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Feb; 141(2):447-450. PubMed ID: 29369997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Three-dimensional facial morphology following surgical repair of unilateral cleft lip and palate in patients after nasoalveolar molding.
Singh GD; Levy-Bercowski D; Yáñez MA; Santiago PE
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2007 Aug; 10(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 17651132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Distances between facial landmarks can be measured accurately with a new digital 3-dimensional video system.
Schimmel M; Christou P; Houstis O; Herrmann FR; Kiliaridis S; Müller F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):580.e1-580.e10; discussion 580-1. PubMed ID: 20451768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Integration of laser surface digitizing with CAD/CAM techniques for developing facial prostheses. Part 1: Design and fabrication of prosthesis replicas.
Cheah CM; Chua CK; Tan KH; Teo CK
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 12956501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Morphometry of the ear in Down's syndrome subjects. A three-dimensional computerized assessment.
Sforza C; Dellavia C; Tartaglia GM; Ferrario VF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 34(5):480-6. PubMed ID: 16053865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Planning implant positions for an auricular prosthesis with digital data.
Reitemeier B; Schöne C; Schreiber S; Stockmann F; Ullmann K; Eckelt U
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):128-31. PubMed ID: 22304747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dimensional accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufactured orbital prostheses.
Marafon PG; Mattos BS; Sabóia AC; Noritomi PY
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 20552095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Design and fabrication of auricular prostheses by CAD/CAM system.
Jiao T; Zhang F; Huang X; Wang C
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(4):460-3. PubMed ID: 15382783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Computer-assisted technique for the design and manufacture of realistic facial prostheses.
Feng Z; Dong Y; Zhao Y; Bai S; Zhou B; Bi Y; Wu G
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 48(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 19556041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Anatomical study of the course of the inferior alveolar nerve in craniofacial microsomia using three-dimensional computed tomography: correlation with the Pruzansky classification.
Neiva C; Dakpe S; Davrou J; Dîner PA; Devauchelle B; Vazquez MP; Picard A; Kadlub N
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 May; 53(5):426-9. PubMed ID: 25765599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Improved Construction of Auricular Prosthesis by Digital Technologies.
Nuseir A; Hatamleh M; Watson J; Al-Wahadni AM; Alzoubi F; Murad M
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 26(6):e502-5. PubMed ID: 26221855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Bilateral implant-retained auricular prosthesis for a patient with congenitally missing ears. A clinical report.
Kumar PS; Satheesh Kumar KS; Savadi RC
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 22372935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Validation and reproducibility of a high-resolution three-dimensional facial imaging system.
Khambay B; Nairn N; Bell A; Miller J; Bowman A; Ayoub AF
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 46(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17561318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Improved facial outcome assessment using a 3D anthropometric mask.
Claes P; Walters M; Clement J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Mar; 41(3):324-30. PubMed ID: 22103995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Implant-Retained Prosthetic Auricular Reconstruction in a Hemifacial Microsomia Individual: A Clinical Report.
Chng CK; Gandedkar NH
Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(1):54-57. PubMed ID: 28085981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of three methods of facial measurement.
Ghoddousi H; Edler R; Haers P; Wertheim D; Greenhill D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 36(3):250-8. PubMed ID: 17113754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Hemifacial microsomia and treatment options for auricular replacement: A review of the literature.
Wang RR; Andres CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Aug; 82(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 10424984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A comparison between computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and laser scanning for capturing 3-dimensional data from an object of standard form.
Coward TJ; Scott BJ; Watson RM; Richards R
Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(5):405-13. PubMed ID: 16220806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Changes in width of lower face after unilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
Tan W; Yu B; Niu F; Gui L
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 23(1):94-7. PubMed ID: 22337382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
