1056 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25191890)
1. Prosthodontic maintenance of overdentures on zirconia implants: 1-year results of a randomized controlled trial.
Osman RB; Ma S
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):461-8. PubMed ID: 25191890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ceramic implants (Y-TZP): are they a viable alternative to titanium implants for the support of overdentures? A randomized clinical trial.
Osman RB; Swain MV; Atieh M; Ma S; Duncan W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Dec; 25(12):1366-77. PubMed ID: 24118368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mandibular overdentures: comparative evaluation of prosthodontic maintenance of three different implant systems during the first year of service.
Watson GK; Payne AG; Purton DG; Thomson WM
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 12066489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mandibular two-implant overdentures: prosthodontic maintenance using different loading protocols and attachment systems.
Mackie A; Lyons K; Thomson WM; Payne AG
Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(5):405-16. PubMed ID: 21909481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A 5-year randomized trial to compare 1 or 2 implants for implant overdentures.
Bryant SR; Walton JN; MacEntee MI
J Dent Res; 2015 Jan; 94(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 25348544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of bar design (round versus milled bar) on prosthodontic maintenance of mandibular overdentures supported by 4 implants: a 5-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 19149069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient satisfaction with maxillary 3-implant overdentures using different attachment systems opposing mandibular 2-implant overdentures.
Al-Zubeidi MI; Alsabeeha NH; Thomson WM; Payne AG
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e11-9. PubMed ID: 21414137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: a prospective evaluation of the burden of prosthodontic maintenance with 3 different attachment systems.
Payne AG; Solomons YF
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):246-53. PubMed ID: 11203640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. One-piece zirconia oral implants: one-year results from a prospective case series. 2. Three-unit fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) reconstruction.
Kohal RJ; Patzelt SB; Butz F; Sahlin H
J Clin Periodontol; 2013 May; 40(5):553-62. PubMed ID: 23506654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patients' perspectives on zirconia and titanium implants with a novel distribution supporting maxillary and mandibular overdentures: a qualitative study.
Osman RB; Morgaine KC; Duncan W; Swain MV; Ma S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 May; 25(5):587-97. PubMed ID: 23278751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The prosthodontic maintenance requirements of mandibular mucosa- and implant-supported overdentures: a review of the literature.
Payne AG; Solomons YF
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 11203639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Maxillary Three-Implant Overdentures Opposing Mandibular Two-Implant Overdentures: 10-Year Prosthodontic Outcomes.
Ma S; Waddell JN; Atieh MA; Alsabeeha NH; Payne AG
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(4):327-36. PubMed ID: 27479337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Marginal bone loss with mandibular two-implant overdentures using different loading protocols and attachment systems: 10-year outcomes.
Ma S; Tawse-Smith A; Thomson WM; Payne AG
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(4):321-32. PubMed ID: 20617220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Zirconia implants supporting overdentures: a pilot study with novel prosthodontic designs.
Osman RB; Payne AG; Duncan W; Ma S
Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(3):277-81. PubMed ID: 23626984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized clinical trial comparing two mandibular implant overdenture designs: 3-year prosthetic outcomes using a six-field protocol.
Walton JN
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 12854788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Immediate loading of mandibular overdentures supported by one-piece, direct metal laser sintering mini-implants: a short-term prospective clinical study.
Mangano FG; Caprioglio A; Levrini L; Farronato D; Zecca PA; Mangano C
J Periodontol; 2015 Feb; 86(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 25272979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A 3-year prospective clinical study of telescopic crown, bar, and locator attachments for removable four implant-supported maxillary overdentures.
Zou D; Wu Y; Huang W; Wang F; Wang S; Zhang Z; Zhang Z
Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(6):566-73. PubMed ID: 24179972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Soft and Hard Tissue Response to Zirconia versus Titanium One-Piece Implants Placed in Alveolar and Palatal Sites: A Randomized Control Trial.
Siddiqi A; Kieser JA; De Silva RK; Thomson WM; Duncan WJ
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):483-96. PubMed ID: 24112624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.
De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
