These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25192848)

  • 1. The effect of application time of two types of bone cement on the cement-bone interface strength.
    Dahabreh Z; Phillips HK; Stewart T; Stone M
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2015 May; 25(4):775-81. PubMed ID: 25192848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of preparation techniques to the strength of the bone-cement interface behind the flange in total knee arthroplasty.
    van de Groes SA; de Waal Malefijt MC; Verdonschot N
    Knee; 2013 Jun; 20(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 22999642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of bone porosity on the shear strength of the bone-cement interface.
    Amirfeyz R; Bannister G
    Int Orthop; 2009 Jun; 33(3):843-6. PubMed ID: 18437380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Bone cement adhesion on ceramic surfaces - surface activation of retention surfaces of knee prostheses by atmospheric plasma versus thermal surface treatment].
    Marx B; Marx R; Reisgen U; Wirtz D
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2015 Apr; 153(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 25874392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tibial Implant Fixation Behavior in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Study With Five Different Bone Cements.
    Grupp TM; Schilling C; Schwiesau J; Pfaff A; Altermann B; Mihalko WM
    J Arthroplasty; 2020 Feb; 35(2):579-587. PubMed ID: 31653466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical strength of the cement-bone interface is greater in shear than in tension.
    Mann KA; Werner FW; Ayers DC
    J Biomech; 1999 Nov; 32(11):1251-4. PubMed ID: 10541077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Different Experience Levels of Orthopaedic Residents Effect on Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) Bone Cement Mechanical Properties.
    Struemph JM; Chong AC; Wooley PH
    Iowa Orthop J; 2015; 35():193-8. PubMed ID: 26361465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Techniques for improving the initial strength of the tibial tray-cement interface bond.
    Billi F; Kavanaugh A; Schmalzried H; Schmalzried TP
    Bone Joint J; 2019 Jan; 101-B(1_Supple_A):53-58. PubMed ID: 30648489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of antibiotic loading on the shear strength at the stem-cement interface (Shear strength of antibiotic loaded cement).
    Kilicoglu O; Koyuncu LO; Ozden VE; Bozdag E; Sunbuloglu E; Yazicioglu O
    Int Orthop; 2008 Aug; 32(4):437-41. PubMed ID: 17356880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mixed-mode failure strength of implant-cement interface specimens with varying surface roughness.
    Zelle J; Janssen D; Peeters S; Brouwer C; Verdonschot N
    J Biomech; 2011 Feb; 44(4):780-3. PubMed ID: 21074772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical bond strength of the cement-tibial component interface in total knee arthroplasty.
    Pittman GT; Peters CL; Hines JL; Bachus KN
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6):883-8. PubMed ID: 16950044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shear properties of bilaminar polymethylmethacrylate cement mantles in revision hip joint arthroplasty.
    Weinrauch PC; Bell C; Wilson L; Goss B; Lutton C; Crawford RW
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Apr; 22(3):394-403. PubMed ID: 17400096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Loosening of tibia baseplates after total knee arthroplasty: Evaluation of pull-out strength of tibia baseplate-cement Interface.
    Rebgetz P; Kovacs A; Bochat K; Hayes A; Clark G; Blakeney W; Pabbruwe M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2021 Dec; 90():105497. PubMed ID: 34619452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cement brand and preparation effects cement-in-cement mantle shear strength.
    Holsgrove TP; Pentlow A; Spencer RF; Miles AW
    Hip Int; 2015; 25(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 25044271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biological and mechanical properties of PMMA-based bioactive bone cements.
    Mousa WF; Kobayashi M; Shinzato S; Kamimura M; Neo M; Yoshihara S; Nakamura T
    Biomaterials; 2000 Nov; 21(21):2137-46. PubMed ID: 10985486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fracture toughness and crack resistance curves of acrylic bone cements.
    Ziegler T; Jaeger R
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2020 Jul; 108(5):1961-1971. PubMed ID: 31859443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of bone porosity on the mechanical integrity of the bone-cement interface.
    Graham J; Ries M; Pruitt L
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Oct; 85(10):1901-8. PubMed ID: 14563796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of storage temperature and equilibration time on polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) bone cement polymerization in joint replacement surgery.
    Koh BT; Tan JH; Ramruttun AK; Wang W
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2015 Nov; 10():178. PubMed ID: 26577581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adhesive strength of total knee endoprostheses to bone cement - analysis of metallic and ceramic femoral components under worst-case conditions.
    Bergschmidt P; Dammer R; Zietz C; Finze S; Mittelmeier W; Bader R
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2016 Jun; 61(3):281-9. PubMed ID: 25781660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The long-term in vivo behavior of polymethyl methacrylate bone cement in total hip arthroplasty.
    Oonishi H; Akiyama H; Takemoto M; Kawai T; Yamamoto K; Yamamuro T; Oonishi H; Nakamura T
    Acta Orthop; 2011 Oct; 82(5):553-8. PubMed ID: 22103279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.