These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25192849)

  • 1. Clinical results of microsurgical bilateral decompression via unilateral approach for lumbar canal stenosis with multiple-level involvement.
    Tanaka N; Nakanishi K; Kamei N; Yamamoto R; Nakamae T; Izumi B; Ohta R; Fujioka Y; Ochi M
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2015 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():S191-8. PubMed ID: 25192849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical Outcomes and Radiologic Changes After Microsurgical Bilateral Decompression by a Unilateral Approach in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Grade I Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With a Minimum 3-Year Follow-Up.
    Jang JW; Park JH; Hyun SJ; Rhim SC
    Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Aug; 29(7):268-71. PubMed ID: 23073148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spinal canal morphology and clinical outcomes of microsurgical bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
    Choi WS; Oh CH; Ji GY; Shin SC; Lee JB; Park DH; Cho TH
    Eur Spine J; 2014 May; 23(5):991-8. PubMed ID: 24292345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lumbar spinal stenosis: prognostic factors for bilateral microsurgical decompression using a unilateral approach.
    Papavero L; Thiel M; Fritzsche E; Kunze C; Westphal M; Kothe R
    Neurosurgery; 2009 Dec; 65(6 Suppl):182-7; discussion187. PubMed ID: 19934993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Sagittal Balance Does not Influence the 1 Year Clinical Outcome of Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Without Obvious Instability After Microsurgical Decompression.
    Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Onken J; Franke J; Czabanka M; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jul; 40(13):1014-21. PubMed ID: 25893354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-Term Clinical Outcome and Reoperation Rate for Microsurgical Bilateral Decompression via Unilateral Approach of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Yüce İ; Kahyaoğlu O; Çavuşoğlu HA; Çavuşoğlu H; Aydın Y
    World Neurosurg; 2019 May; 125():e465-e472. PubMed ID: 30710724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How I do it: bilateral lumbar spinal canal microsurgical decompression via unilateral approach.
    Borshchenko I; Gulzatyan A; Kartavykh R; Grin A
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2019 Nov; 161(11):2375-2380. PubMed ID: 31506727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical outcome of microsurgical bilateral decompression via unilateral approach for lumbar canal stenosis: minimum five-year follow-up.
    Toyoda H; Nakamura H; Konishi S; Dohzono S; Kato M; Matsuda H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Mar; 36(5):410-5. PubMed ID: 20847714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microsurgical bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis including degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Sasai K; Umeda M; Maruyama T; Wakabayashi E; Iida H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2008 Dec; 9(6):554-9. PubMed ID: 19035747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 10-year Longitudinal MRI Study of Intervertebral Disk Degeneration in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis After Posterior Lumbar Decompression Surgery.
    Fujii T; Daimon K; Ozaki M; Suzuki S; Takahashi Y; Tsuji O; Nagoshi N; Yagi M; Michikawa T; Matsumoto M; Nakamura M; Watanabe K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2023 Jun; 48(12):815-824. PubMed ID: 37026757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Five-year results of a clinical pilot study utilizing a pedicle-lengthening osteotomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Mlyavykh S; Ludwig SC; Kepler CK; Anderson DG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Sep; 29(3):241-249. PubMed ID: 29856305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Success and failure of minimally invasive decompression for focal lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without deformity.
    Kelleher MO; Timlin M; Persaud O; Rampersaud YR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E981-7. PubMed ID: 20386501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of obesity on complications and outcomes: a comparison of fusion and nonfusion lumbar spine surgery.
    Onyekwelu I; Glassman SD; Asher AL; Shaffrey CI; Mummaneni PV; Carreon LY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):158-162. PubMed ID: 27740396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally Invasive Computer Navigation-Assisted Endoscopic Transforaminal Interbody Fusion with Bilateral Decompression via a Unilateral Approach: Initial Clinical Experience at One-Year Follow-Up.
    Zhang Y; Xu C; Zhou Y; Huang B
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Oct; 106():291-299. PubMed ID: 28710043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Posterolateral fusion combined with posterior decompression shows superiority in the treatment of severe lumbar spinal stenosis without lumbar disc protrusion or prolapse: a retrospective cohort study.
    Wang C; Yin X; Zhang L; Xue X; Xiang Y; Jin H; Liu M; Zhao J
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Jan; 15(1):26. PubMed ID: 31969171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reoperation Rate After Microsurgical Uni- or Bilateral Laminotomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With and Without Low-grade Spondylolisthesis: What do Preoperative Radiographic Parameters Tell Us?
    Schär RT; Kiebach S; Raabe A; Ulrich CT
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Feb; 44(4):E245-E251. PubMed ID: 30015718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term results of microsurgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis by unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression.
    Oertel MF; Ryang YM; Korinth MC; Gilsbach JM; Rohde V
    Neurosurgery; 2006 Dec; 59(6):1264-9; discussion 1269-70. PubMed ID: 17277689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally invasive decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative scoliosis: Predictive factors of radiographic and clinical outcomes.
    Minamide A; Yoshida M; Iwahashi H; Simpson AK; Yamada H; Hashizume H; Nakagawa Y; Iwasaki H; Tsutsui S; Kagotani R; Sonekatsu M; Sasaki T; Shinto K; Deguchi T
    J Orthop Sci; 2017 May; 22(3):377-383. PubMed ID: 28161236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic neutralization of the lumbar spine after microsurgical decompression in acquired lumbar spinal stenosis and segmental instability.
    Würgler-Hauri CC; Kalbarczyk A; Wiesli M; Landolt H; Fandino J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Feb; 33(3):E66-72. PubMed ID: 18303447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The interspinous ligament should be removed for the decompression surgery with the case of lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
    Yuzawa Y
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2011 Jun; 131(6):753-8. PubMed ID: 21161255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.