These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25193353)

  • 1. The effects of experience on the development of sexual behaviour of males and females of the banded demoiselle (Calopteryx splendens).
    Verzijden MN; Scobell SK; Svensson EI
    Behav Processes; 2014 Nov; 109 Pt B():180-9. PubMed ID: 25193353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interspecific interactions and learning variability jointly drive geographic differences in mate preferences.
    Verzijden MN; Svensson EI
    Evolution; 2016 Aug; 70(8):1896-903. PubMed ID: 27302691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice.
    Kozak GM; Reisland M; Boughmann JW
    Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19154359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Plasticity of the mate choice mind: courtship evokes choice-like brain responses in females from a coercive mating system.
    Wang SM; Ramsey ME; Cummings ME
    Genes Brain Behav; 2014 Apr; 13(4):365-75. PubMed ID: 24548673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A role for learning in population divergence of mate preferences.
    Svensson EI; Eroukhmanoff F; Karlsson K; Runemark A; Brodin A
    Evolution; 2010 Nov; 64(11):3101-13. PubMed ID: 20629727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gender differences in species recognition and the evolution of asymmetric sexual isolation.
    Svensson EI; Karlsson K; Friberg M; Eroukhmanoff F
    Curr Biol; 2007 Nov; 17(22):1943-7. PubMed ID: 17935996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An eye for beauty: lateralized visual stimulation of courtship behavior and mate preferences in male zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata.
    Templeton JJ; McCracken BG; Sher M; Mountjoy DJ
    Behav Processes; 2014 Feb; 102():33-9. PubMed ID: 24239504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental evidence for asymmetric mate preference and aggression: behavioral interactions in a woodrat (Neotoma) hybrid zone.
    Shurtliff QR; Murphy PJ; Yeiter JD; Matocq MD
    BMC Evol Biol; 2013 Oct; 13():220. PubMed ID: 24093823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Linking intra- and interspecific assortative mating: Consequences for asymmetric sexual isolation.
    Svensson EI; Nordén A; Waller JT; Runemark A
    Evolution; 2016 Jun; 70(6):1165-79. PubMed ID: 27151764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Light is required for proper female mate choice between winged and wingless males in Drosophila.
    Watanabe K; Suzuki Y; Inami S; Ohashi H; Sakai T
    Genes Genet Syst; 2018 Oct; 93(3):119-123. PubMed ID: 29998908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Glucocorticoids, male sexual signals, and mate choice by females: Implications for sexual selection.
    Leary CJ; Baugh AT
    Gen Comp Endocrinol; 2020 Mar; 288():113354. PubMed ID: 31830474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sexual conflict and ecology: Species composition and male density interact to reduce male mating harassment and increase female survival.
    Gomez-Llano MA; Bensch HM; Svensson EI
    Evolution; 2018 Apr; 72(4):906-915. PubMed ID: 29465798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sequential mate choice and sexual isolation in threespine stickleback species.
    Kozak GM; Head ML; Lackey AC; Boughman JW
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Jan; 26(1):130-40. PubMed ID: 23194003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Why do males choose heterospecific females in the red spider mite?
    Sato Y; Staudacher H; Sabelis MW
    Exp Appl Acarol; 2016 Jan; 68(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 26530994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Female mate preferences on high-dimensional shape variation for male species recognition traits.
    Siepielski AM; McPeek SJ; McPeek MA
    J Evol Biol; 2018 Aug; 31(8):1239-1250. PubMed ID: 29876989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences.
    Jennions MD; Petrie M
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 1997 May; 72(2):283-327. PubMed ID: 9155244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation.
    McPeek MA; Gavrilets S
    Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1967-80. PubMed ID: 17133854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mate preference for a phenotypically plastic trait is learned, and may facilitate preference-phenotype matching.
    Westerman EL; Chirathivat N; Schyling E; Monteiro A
    Evolution; 2014 Jun; 68(6):1661-70. PubMed ID: 24528407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Male preference for conspecific mates is stronger than females' in Betta splendens.
    Justus KT; Mendelson TC
    Behav Processes; 2018 Jun; 151():6-10. PubMed ID: 29501548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simulating range expansion: male species recognition and loss of premating isolation in damselflies.
    Wellenreuther M; Tynkkynen K; Svensson EI
    Evolution; 2010 Jan; 64(1):242-52. PubMed ID: 19674095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.