These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25197061)

  • 41. Rapid and socially induced change of a badge of status.
    Rhodes SB; Schlupp I
    J Fish Biol; 2012 Mar; 80(3):722-7. PubMed ID: 22380566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. How flies are flirting on the fly.
    Eichorn C; Hrabar M; Van Ryn EC; Brodie BS; Blake AJ; Gries G
    BMC Biol; 2017 Feb; 15(1):2. PubMed ID: 28193269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The Developmental and Genetic Architecture of the Sexually Selected Male Ornament of Swordtails.
    Schartl M; Kneitz S; Ormanns J; Schmidt C; Anderson JL; Amores A; Catchen J; Wilson C; Geiger D; Du K; Garcia-Olazábal M; Sudaram S; Winkler C; Hedrich R; Warren WC; Walter R; Meyer A; Postlethwait JH
    Curr Biol; 2021 Mar; 31(5):911-922.e4. PubMed ID: 33275891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.
    Bonduriansky R
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2001 Aug; 76(3):305-39. PubMed ID: 11569787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Females are choosier in the dark: environment-dependent reliance on courtship components and its impact on fitness.
    Rundus AS; Sullivan-Beckers L; Wilgers DJ; Hebets EA
    Evolution; 2011 Jan; 65(1):268-82. PubMed ID: 20825477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Female mice exhibit both sexual and social partner preferences for vocalizing males.
    Nomoto K; Ikumi M; Otsuka M; Asaba A; Kato M; Koshida N; Mogi K; Kikusui T
    Integr Zool; 2018 Nov; 13(6):735-744. PubMed ID: 30019858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. INTERSPECIFIC RECOGNITION AND DISCRIMINATION BASED UPON OLFACTORY CUES IN NORTHERN SWORDTAILS.
    McLennan DA; Ryan MJ
    Evolution; 1999 Jun; 53(3):880-888. PubMed ID: 28565635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Barriers to gene exchange in hybridizing field crickets: the role of male courtship effort and cuticular hydrocarbons.
    Maroja LS; McKenzie ZM; Hart E; Jing J; Larson EL; Richardson DP
    BMC Evol Biol; 2014 Mar; 14(1):65. PubMed ID: 24678642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The effects of experience on the development of sexual behaviour of males and females of the banded demoiselle (Calopteryx splendens).
    Verzijden MN; Scobell SK; Svensson EI
    Behav Processes; 2014 Nov; 109 Pt B():180-9. PubMed ID: 25193353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Experience matters: females use smell to select experienced males for paternal care.
    Fletcher N; Storey EJ; Johnson M; Reish DJ; Hardege JD
    PLoS One; 2009 Nov; 4(11):e7672. PubMed ID: 19888341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Nonlinear changes in selection on a mating display across a continuous thermal gradient.
    Rosenthal MF; Elias DO
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Jul; 286(1907):20191450. PubMed ID: 31337317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Sex and differentiation: population genetic divergence and sexual dimorphism in Mexican goodeid fish.
    Ritchie MG; Hamill RM; Graves JA; Magurran AE; Webb SA; Macías Garcia C
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Sep; 20(5):2048-55. PubMed ID: 17714321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Female Brazilian whiptail lizards (Cnemidophorus ocellifer) prefer males with high ultraviolet ornament reflectance.
    Lisboa CMCA; Bajer K; Pessoa DMA; Huber MAA; Costa GC
    Behav Processes; 2017 Sep; 142():33-39. PubMed ID: 28528929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Mate sampling influences the intensity of sexual selection and the evolution of costly sexual ornaments.
    Muniz DG; Machado G
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Jun; 447():74-83. PubMed ID: 29567325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Does mating prevent monogamous males from seeking other females? A study in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster).
    Rodriguez NA; Legzim KM; Aliou F; Al-Naimi OA; Bamshad M
    Behav Processes; 2013 Nov; 100():185-91. PubMed ID: 24140461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Warning signals are seductive: relative contributions of color and pattern to predator avoidance and mate attraction in Heliconius butterflies.
    Finkbeiner SD; Briscoe AD; Reed RD
    Evolution; 2014 Dec; 68(12):3410-20. PubMed ID: 25200939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Noise affects mate choice based on visual information via cross-sensory interference.
    Zhu B; Zhang H; Chen Q; He Q; Zhao X; Sun X; Wang T; Wang J; Cui J
    Environ Pollut; 2022 Sep; 308():119680. PubMed ID: 35787421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Environmental change mediates mate choice for an extended phenotype, but not for mate quality.
    Head ML; Fox RJ; Barber I
    Evolution; 2017 Jan; 71(1):135-144. PubMed ID: 27748950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Conflicting preferences within females: sexual selection versus species recognition.
    Rosenthal GG; Ryan MJ
    Biol Lett; 2011 Aug; 7(4):525-7. PubMed ID: 21367782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Influence of lighting environment on social preferences in sticklebacks from two different photic habitats. I. mate preferences of wild-caught females.
    Hiermes M; Reher S; Rick IP; Bakker TCM
    Curr Zool; 2021 Jun; 67(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 34616922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.