BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25197990)

  • 21. In vivo evaluation of glass-ionomer cement adhesion to dentin.
    Mason PN; Ferrari M
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Jul; 25(7):499-504. PubMed ID: 7991772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Long-term evaluation of the remineralization of interproximal caries-like lesions adjacent to glass-ionomer restorations: a micro-CT study.
    Lee HS; Berg JH; García-Godoy F; Jang KT
    Am J Dent; 2008 Apr; 21(2):129-32. PubMed ID: 18578183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Partial removal of carious dentine: a multicenter randomized controlled trial and 18-month follow-up results.
    Maltz M; Jardim JJ; Mestrinho HD; Yamaguti PM; Podestá K; Moura MS; de Paula LM
    Caries Res; 2013; 47(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 23207420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ion concentration adjacent to glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars.
    Bezerra AC; Novaes RC; Faber J; Frencken JE; Leal SC
    Dent Mater; 2012 Nov; 28(11):e259-63. PubMed ID: 22999372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Subtraction Radiographic Assessment of Underlying Dentin After Partial Carious Dentin Removal in Primary Teeth.
    Phonghanyudh A; Ruangdit C; Pornprasertsuk-D Amrongsri S; Phanthumvanit P
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2017; 15(6):575-579. PubMed ID: 28944352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
    Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fluoride release and caries inhibition associated with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement at varying fluoride loading doses.
    Donly KJ; Segura A
    Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 12074234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical, mineral and ultrastructural changes in carious dentin of primary molars after restoration.
    Chibinski AC; Wambier L; Reis A; Wambier DS
    Int Dent J; 2016 Jun; 66(3):150-7. PubMed ID: 26846944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Oral Function Improves Interfacial Integrity and Sealing Ability Between Conventional Glass Ionomer Cements and Dentin.
    Toledano M; Osorio R; Cabello I; Osorio E; Toledano-Osorio M; Aguilera FS
    Microsc Microanal; 2017 Feb; 23(1):131-144. PubMed ID: 28148310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An in vitro study on the secondary caries-prevention properties of three restorative materials.
    Lai GY; Zhu LK; Li MY; Wang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):363-8. PubMed ID: 23998624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. 30-Month randomised clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of a nanofill and a nanohybrid composite.
    de Andrade AK; Duarte RM; Medeiros e Silva FD; Batista AU; Lima KC; Pontual ML; Montes MA
    J Dent; 2011 Jan; 39(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 20888884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Resistance to degradation of bonded restorations to simulated caries-affected primary dentin.
    Marquezan M; Osorio R; Ciamponi AL; Toledano M
    Am J Dent; 2010 Feb; 23(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 20437728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations.
    Powell LV; Johnson GH; Gordon GE
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of Dentin Caries Remineralization with Four Bioactive Cements.
    Valizadeh S; Kamangar SSH; Nekoofar MH; Behroozibakhsh M; Shahidi Z
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2022 Aug; 30(3):223-229. PubMed ID: 35438264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Microhardness and elemental analysis of ion-releasing restoration/ dentin interface following enzymatic chemomechanical caries excavation.
    Al-Wakeel RE; Hamama HH; Farahat DS; El-Negoly SA
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 May; 24(1):581. PubMed ID: 38764034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Physiological remineralization of artificially demineralized dentin beneath glass ionomer cements with and without bacterial contamination in vivo.
    Kitasako Y; Nakajima M; Foxton RM; Aoki K; Pereira PN; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 12760699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Ultrastructural and microbiological analysis of the dentin layers affected by caries lesions in primary molars treated by minimal intervention.
    Wambier DS; dos Santos FA; Guedes-Pinto AC; Jaeger RG; Simionato MR
    Pediatr Dent; 2007; 29(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 17688020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Use of bulk fill resin composite and universal adhesive for restoring primary teeth after selective carious tissue removal to soft dentin: A randomized clinical trial.
    Massa MG; Trentin GA; Noal FC; Franzon R; Lenzi TL; de Araujo FB
    Am J Dent; 2022 Apr; 35(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 35506965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Biocompatibility of a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement applied as pulp capping in human teeth.
    do Nascimento AB; Fontana UF; Teixeira HM; Costa CA
    Am J Dent; 2000 Feb; 13(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 11763899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.