182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25198092)
1. The accuracy and precision of two non-invasive, magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound-based thermal diffusivity estimation methods.
Dillon CR; Payne A; Christensen DA; Roemer RB
Int J Hyperthermia; 2014 Sep; 30(6):362-71. PubMed ID: 25198092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Thermal diffusivity and perfusion constants from in vivo MR-guided focussed ultrasound treatments: a feasibility study.
Dillon CR; Rieke V; Ghanouni P; Payne A
Int J Hyperthermia; 2018 Jun; 34(4):352-362. PubMed ID: 28595499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analytical estimation of ultrasound properties, thermal diffusivity, and perfusion using magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound temperature data.
Dillon CR; Borasi G; Payne A
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jan; 61(2):923-36. PubMed ID: 26741344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Simultaneous estimation of SAR, thermal diffusivity, and damping using periodic power modulation for MRgFUS quality assurance.
Nouwens S; Paulides M; Lindemeyer J; Sebeke L; van Kampen R; Grüll H; Heemels M
Int J Hyperthermia; 2023; 40(1):2283388. PubMed ID: 37994800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. 3D-specific absorption rate estimation from high-intensity focused ultrasound sonications using the Green's function heat kernel.
Freeman NJ; Odéen H; Parker DL
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3109-3119. PubMed ID: 29772066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting high-intensity focused ultrasound thalamotomy lesions using 2D magnetic resonance thermometry and 3D Gaussian modeling.
Seasons GM; Mazerolle EL; Sankar T; Martino D; Kiss ZHT; Pichardo S; Pike GB
Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 46(12):5722-5732. PubMed ID: 31621080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of MRTI sampling characteristics on estimation of HIFU SAR and tissue thermal diffusivity.
Dillon CR; Todd N; Payne A; Parker DL; Christensen DA; Roemer RB
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 58(20):7291-307. PubMed ID: 24077026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A tissue preparation to characterize uterine fibroid tissue properties for thermal therapies.
Dillon C; Rezvani M; McLean H; Adelman M; Dassel M; Jarboe E; Janát-Amsbury M; Payne A
Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 46(8):3344-3355. PubMed ID: 31152601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reduction of peak acoustic pressure and shaping of heated region by use of multifoci sonications in MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound mediated mild hyperthermia.
Partanen A; Tillander M; Yarmolenko PS; Wood BJ; Dreher MR; Kohler MO
Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):013301. PubMed ID: 23298120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Referenceless magnetic resonance temperature imaging using Gaussian process modeling.
Yung JP; Fuentes D; MacLellan CJ; Maier F; Liapis Y; Hazle JD; Stafford RJ
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3545-3555. PubMed ID: 28317125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-invasive determination of tissue thermal parameters from high intensity focused ultrasound treatment monitored by volumetric MRI thermometry.
Dragonu I; de Oliveira PL; Laurent C; Mougenot C; Grenier N; Moonen CT; Quesson B
NMR Biomed; 2009 Oct; 22(8):843-51. PubMed ID: 19562728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simulating thermal effects of MR-guided focused ultrasound in cortical bone and its surrounding tissue.
Hudson TJ; Looi T; Pichardo S; Amaral J; Temple M; Drake JM; Waspe AC
Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):506-519. PubMed ID: 29193144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and validation of a MRgHIFU non-invasive tissue acoustic property estimation technique.
Johnson SL; Dillon C; Odéen H; Parker D; Christensen D; Payne A
Int J Hyperthermia; 2016 Nov; 32(7):723-34. PubMed ID: 27441427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sensitivity of tissue properties derived from MRgFUS temperature data to input errors and data inclusion criteria: ex vivo study in porcine muscle.
Shi YC; Parker DL; Dillon CR
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Aug; 61(15):N373-85. PubMed ID: 27385508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of acoustic-thermal simulations of in vivo magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound ablative therapy.
Richards N; Christensen D; Hillyard J; Kline M; Johnson S; Odéen H; Payne A
Int J Hyperthermia; 2024; 41(1):2301489. PubMed ID: 38234019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound ablation on human cadaver breast tissue.
Merckel LG; Deckers R; Baron P; Bleys RL; van Diest PJ; Moonen CT; Mali WP; van den Bosch MA; Bartels LW
Eur J Pharmacol; 2013 Oct; 717(1-3):21-30. PubMed ID: 23583321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intracranial inertial cavitation threshold and thermal ablation lesion creation using MRI-guided 220-kHz focused ultrasound surgery: preclinical investigation.
Xu Z; Carlson C; Snell J; Eames M; Hananel A; Lopes MB; Raghavan P; Lee CC; Yen CP; Schlesinger D; Kassell NF; Aubry JF; Sheehan J
J Neurosurg; 2015 Jan; 122(1):152-61. PubMed ID: 25380106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MR-guided focused ultrasound application for moving target tumor ablation in abdominal area: coil selection.
Mihcin S; Gagliardo C; Toia P; Dennison A; Strehlow J; Melzer A
Acta Radiol; 2021 Jan; 62(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 32276552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Non-invasive Measurement of Thermal Diffusivity Using High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Through-Transmission Ultrasonic Imaging.
Yeshurun L; Azhari H
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Jan; 42(1):243-56. PubMed ID: 26489364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tissue thermal conductivity by magnetic resonance thermometry and focused ultrasound heating.
Cheng HL; Plewes DB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Nov; 16(5):598-609. PubMed ID: 12412038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
