310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25198281)
1. Positive Results Bias and Impact Factor in Ophthalmology.
Mimouni M; Krauthammer M; Gershoni A; Mimouni F; Nesher R
Curr Eye Res; 2015; 40(8):858-61. PubMed ID: 25198281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Positive results bias in pediatric ophthalmology scientific publications.
Gershoni A; Ben Ishai M; Vainer I; Mimouni M; Mezer E
J AAPOS; 2018 Oct; 22(5):394-395.e1. PubMed ID: 30077820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Publication times, impact factors, and advance online publication in ophthalmology journals.
Chen H; Chen CH; Jhanji V
Ophthalmology; 2013 Aug; 120(8):1697-701. PubMed ID: 23623355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature.
De Oliveira GS; Chang R; Kendall MC; Fitzgerald PC; McCarthy RJ
Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1042-8. PubMed ID: 22344237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Self-citation rate and impact factor in ophthalmology.
Mimouni M; Segal O
Ophthalmic Res; 2014; 52(3):136-40. PubMed ID: 25300716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The outcome of manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Ophthalmology between 2002 and 2003.
Liesegang TJ; Shaikh M; Crook JE
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):551-60. PubMed ID: 17276380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are studies reporting significant results more likely to be published?
Koletsi D; Karagianni A; Pandis N; Makou M; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):632.e1-5; discussion 632-3. PubMed ID: 19892276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Re: Chen et al.: Publication times, impact factors, and advance online publication in ophthalmology journals (Ophthalmology 2013;120:1697-701).
Sugar A;
Ophthalmology; 2014 Jun; 121(6):e29. PubMed ID: 24565740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Trends in impact factors of ophthalmology journals.
Vainer I; Mimouni F; Blumenthal EZ; Mimouni M
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2016 Sep; 64(9):668-671. PubMed ID: 27853016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of the publication volume of Canadian ophthalmology departments from 2005 to 2009: a systematic review of the literature.
Micieli A; Micieli JA; Smith AF
Can J Ophthalmol; 2011 Feb; 46(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 21283161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fragility of Results in Ophthalmology Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review.
Shen C; Shamsudeen I; Farrokhyar F; Sabri K
Ophthalmology; 2018 May; 125(5):642-648. PubMed ID: 29241744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Negative results and impact factor: a lesson from neonatology.
Littner Y; Mimouni FB; Dollberg S; Mandel D
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2005 Nov; 159(11):1036-7. PubMed ID: 16275793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Subspecialization of the ophthalmic literature: a review of the publishing trends of the top general, clinical ophthalmic journals.
Kumar A; Cheeseman R; Durnian JM
Ophthalmology; 2011 Jun; 118(6):1211-4. PubMed ID: 21269704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomized trials published in higher vs. lower impact journals differ in design, conduct, and analysis.
Bala MM; Akl EA; Sun X; Bassler D; Mertz D; Mejza F; Vandvik PO; Malaga G; Johnston BC; Dahm P; Alonso-Coello P; Diaz-Granados N; Srinathan SK; Hassouneh B; Briel M; Busse JW; You JJ; Walter SD; Altman DG; Guyatt GH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Mar; 66(3):286-95. PubMed ID: 23347852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Research productivity of Canadian ophthalmology departments in top 10 ophthalmology and vision science journals from 2001 to 2010.
Schlenker MB; Manalo E; Wong AM
Can J Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 48(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 23419298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does open access in ophthalmology affect how articles are subsequently cited in research?
Lansingh VC; Carter MJ
Ophthalmology; 2009 Aug; 116(8):1425-31. PubMed ID: 19545905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of editorial and peer review processes in publication bias: analysis of drug trials submitted to eight medical journals.
van Lent M; Overbeke J; Out HJ
PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e104846. PubMed ID: 25118182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Low power and type II errors in recent ophthalmology research.
Khan Z; Milko J; Iqbal M; Masri M; Almeida DRP
Can J Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 51(5):368-372. PubMed ID: 27769328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Citations to trials of nicotine replacement therapy were biased toward positive results and high-impact-factor journals.
Etter JF; Stapleton J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):831-7. PubMed ID: 19128941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of study outcome on submission and acceptance metrics for peer reviewed medical journals: six year retrospective review of all completed GlaxoSmithKline human drug research studies.
Evoniuk G; Mansi B; DeCastro B; Sykes J
BMJ; 2017 Apr; 357():j1726. PubMed ID: 28432051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
