These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25199467)

  • 1. Surprise attracts the eyes and binds the gaze.
    Horstmann G; Herwig A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Jun; 22(3):743-9. PubMed ID: 25199467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Expectations and perceptual priming in a visual search task: Evidence from eye movements and behavior.
    Shurygina O; Kristjánsson Á; Tudge L; Chetverikov A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Apr; 45(4):489-499. PubMed ID: 30816788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Oculomotor Capture by New and Unannounced Color Singletons during Visual Search.
    Retell JD; Venini D; Becker SI
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1529-43. PubMed ID: 25832190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relations among visual strategies, force fluctuations, and attention during a force-matching task.
    Huddleston W; Keenan K; Ernest B
    Percept Mot Skills; 2013 Dec; 117(3):775-800. PubMed ID: 24665797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Functional fixedness: The functional significance of delayed disengagement based on attention set.
    Wright TJ; Boot WR; Brockmole JR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 25384235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effective scheduling of looking and talking during rapid automatized naming.
    Gordon PC; Hoedemaker RS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 May; 42(5):742-60. PubMed ID: 26689309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Overt attention in contextual cuing of visual search is driven by the attentional set, but not by the predictiveness of distractors.
    Beesley T; Hanafi G; Vadillo MA; Shanks DR; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):707-721. PubMed ID: 29608077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual response properties of single neurons in the temporal pole of behaving monkeys.
    Nakamura K; Matsumoto K; Mikami A; Kubota K
    J Neurophysiol; 1994 Mar; 71(3):1206-21. PubMed ID: 8201413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence for attentional capture by a surprising color singleton in visual search.
    Horstmann G
    Psychol Sci; 2002 Nov; 13(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 12430832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the automaticity of contingent capture: disruption caused by the attentional blink.
    Du F; Yang J; Yin Y; Zhang K; Abrams RA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Oct; 20(5):944-50. PubMed ID: 23444107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual search with varying versus consistent attentional templates: Effects on target template establishment, comparison, and guidance.
    Goldstein RR; Beck MR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1086-1102. PubMed ID: 29620379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of eye movements, spatial attention, and stimulus features on inattentional blindness.
    Koivisto M; Hyönä J; Revonsuo A
    Vision Res; 2004 Dec; 44(27):3211-21. PubMed ID: 15482807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is attention really biased toward the last target location in visual search? The role of focal attention and stimulus-response translation rules.
    Hilchey MD; Pratt J; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1415-1428. PubMed ID: 31343242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jan; 44(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 29309194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selecting for memory? The influence of selective attention on the mnemonic binding of contextual information.
    Uncapher MR; Rugg MD
    J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(25):8270-9. PubMed ID: 19553466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The allocation of resources in visual working memory and multiple attentional templates.
    Kerzel D; Witzel C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):645-658. PubMed ID: 30920252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Model of Multiple Identity Tracking (MOMIT) 2.0: Resolving the serial vs. parallel controversy in tracking.
    Li J; Oksama L; Hyönä J
    Cognition; 2019 Jan; 182():260-274. PubMed ID: 30384128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Grapheme-color synesthesia influences overt visual attention.
    Carriere JS; Eaton D; Reynolds MG; Dixon MJ; Smilek D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 21(2):246-58. PubMed ID: 18564049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Introspective access to implicit shifts of attention.
    Reyes G; Sackur J
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Feb; 48():11-20. PubMed ID: 27810726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intact attentional orienting towards inverted faces revealed by both manual responses and eye-movement measurement in individuals with Williams syndrome.
    Hirai M; Muramatsu Y; Mizuno S; Kurahashi N; Kurahashi H; Nakamura M
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2016 Oct; 60(10):969-81. PubMed ID: 27476718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.