152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25199712)
1. Comparison of MRI- and CT-based patient-specific guides for total knee arthroplasty.
Asada S; Mori S; Matsushita T; Nakagawa K; Tsukamoto I; Akagi M
Knee; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1238-43. PubMed ID: 25199712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of MRI-based vs. CT-based patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.
An VV; Sivakumar BS; Phan K; Levy YD; Bruce WJ
J Orthop Sci; 2017 Jan; 22(1):116-120. PubMed ID: 27823847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A radiological analysis of the difference between MRI- and CT-based patient-specific matched guides for total knee arthroplasty from the same manufacturer: a randomised controlled trial.
Schotanus MG; Sollie R; van Haaren EH; Hendrickx RP; Jansen EJ; Kort NP
Bone Joint J; 2016 Jun; 98-B(6):786-92. PubMed ID: 27235521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional analysis of accuracy of component positioning in total knee arthroplasty with patient specific and conventional instruments: A randomized controlled trial.
De Vloo R; Pellikaan P; Dhollander A; Vander Sloten J
Knee; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1469-1477. PubMed ID: 28943039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiographic outcome of limb-based versus knee-based patient specific guides in total knee arthroplasty.
Crane C; Marimuthu K; Chen DB; Harris IA; Wheatley E; MacDessi SJ
Knee; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1244-9. PubMed ID: 25218970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MRI is more accurate than CT for patient-specific total knee arthroplasty.
Frye BM; Najim AA; Adams JB; Berend KR; Lombardi AV
Knee; 2015 Dec; 22(6):609-12. PubMed ID: 25813758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient-specific positioning guides for total knee arthroplasty: no significant difference between final component alignment and pre-operative digital plan except for tibial rotation.
Boonen B; Schotanus MGM; Kerens B; Hulsmans FJ; Tuinebreijer WE; Kort NP
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Sep; 25(9):2809-2817. PubMed ID: 26055253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Mark Coventry Award: Custom Cutting Guides Do Not Improve Total Knee Arthroplasty Clinical Outcomes at 2 Years Followup.
Nam D; Park A; Stambough JB; Johnson SR; Nunley RM; Barrack RL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jan; 474(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 25712865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Total Ankle Arthroplasty Accuracy and Reproducibility Using Preoperative CT Scan-Derived, Patient-Specific Guides.
Berlet GC; Penner MJ; Lancianese S; Stemniski PM; Obert RM
Foot Ankle Int; 2014 Jul; 35(7):665-76. PubMed ID: 24719401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved alignment and operating room efficiency with patient-specific instrumentation for TKA.
Renson L; Poilvache P; Van den Wyngaert H
Knee; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1216-20. PubMed ID: 25450010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3D templating and patient-specific cutting guides (Knee-Plan) in total knee arthroplasty: postoperative CT-based assessment of implant positioning.
Franceschi JP; Sbihi A;
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2014 Oct; 100(6 Suppl):S281-6. PubMed ID: 25175982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of patient-specific and conventional instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Abane L; Anract P; Boisgard S; Descamps S; Courpied JP; Hamadouche M
Bone Joint J; 2015 Jan; 97-B(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 25568414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional analysis of accuracy of patient-matched instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: Evaluation of intraoperative techniques and postoperative alignment.
Kuwashima U; Mizu-Uchi H; Okazaki K; Hamai S; Akasaki Y; Murakami K; Nakashima Y
J Orthop Sci; 2017 Nov; 22(6):1077-1083. PubMed ID: 28888738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CT- versus MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wu XD; Xiang BY; Schotanus MGM; Liu ZH; Chen Y; Huang W
Surgeon; 2017 Dec; 15(6):336-348. PubMed ID: 28756064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Abnormal rate of intraoperative and postoperative implant positioning outliers using "MRI-based patient-specific" compared to "computer assisted" instrumentation in total knee replacement.
Ollivier M; Tribot-Laspiere Q; Amzallag J; Boisrenoult P; Pujol N; Beaufils P
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Nov; 24(11):3441-3447. PubMed ID: 25994474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implant positioning in TKA: comparison between conventional and patient-specific instrumentation.
Ferrara F; Cipriani A; Magarelli N; Rapisarda S; De Santis V; Burrofato A; Leone A; Bonomo L
Orthopedics; 2015 Apr; 38(4):e271-80. PubMed ID: 25901619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient specific cutting blocks are currently of no proven value.
Barrack RL; Ruh EL; Williams BM; Ford AD; Foreman K; Nunley RM
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Nov; 94(11 Suppl A):95-9. PubMed ID: 23118393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiographic Outcomes of Preoperative CT Scan-Derived Patient-Specific Total Ankle Arthroplasty.
Hsu AR; Davis WH; Cohen BE; Jones CP; Ellington JK; Anderson RB
Foot Ankle Int; 2015 Oct; 36(10):1163-9. PubMed ID: 25941196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of alignment using patient specific guides, computer navigation and conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty.
MacDessi SJ; Jang B; Harris IA; Wheatley E; Bryant C; Chen DB
Knee; 2014 Mar; 21(2):406-9. PubMed ID: 24378337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment.
Moon YW; Ha CW; Do KH; Kim CY; Han JH; Na SE; Lee CH; Kim JG; Park YS
Comput Aided Surg; 2012; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 22348661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
