These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25200374)

  • 1. Changes in shear wave speed pre- and post-induction of labor: a feasibility study.
    Carlson LC; Romero ST; Palmeri ML; Muñoz Del Rio A; Esplin SM; Rotemberg VM; Hall TJ; Feltovich H
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 46(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 25200374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Methods for assessing pre-induction cervical ripening.
    Ezebialu IU; Eke AC; Eleje GU; Nwachukwu CE
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Jun; 2015(6):CD010762. PubMed ID: 26068943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In Vivo Evaluation of Cervical Stiffness Evolution during Induced Ripening Using Shear Wave Elastography, Histology and 2 Photon Excitation Microscopy: Insight from an Animal Model.
    Peralta L; Mourier E; Richard C; Charpigny G; Larcher T; Aït-Belkacem D; Balla NK; Brasselet S; Tanter M; Muller M; Chavatte-Palmer P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133377. PubMed ID: 26317774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The predictive value of cervical shear wave elastography in the outcome of labor induction.
    Lu J; Cheng YKY; Ho SYS; Sahota DS; Hui LL; Poon LC; Leung TY
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Jan; 99(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 31691266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative assessment of cervical softening during pregnancy in the Rhesus macaque with shear wave elasticity imaging.
    Rosado-Mendez IM; Carlson LC; Woo KM; Santoso AP; Guerrero QW; Palmeri ML; Feltovich H; Hall TJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Apr; 63(8):085016. PubMed ID: 29517492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methods for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
    Tenore JL
    Am Fam Physician; 2003 May; 67(10):2123-8. PubMed ID: 12776961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound assessment of the cervix for the prediction of successful induction of labor with prostaglandin in prolonged pregnancy.
    Rovas L; Sladkevicius P; Strobel E; Valentin L
    J Ultrasound Med; 2005 Jul; 24(7):933-9. PubMed ID: 15972707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter pre-induction of labor].
    Jagielska I; Kazdepka-Ziemińska A; Janicki R; Fórmaniak J; Walentowicz-Sadłecka M; Grabiec M
    Ginekol Pol; 2013 Mar; 84(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 23700844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Ham D; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 180(5):1155-60. PubMed ID: 10329871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement as a predictor of successful labor induction.
    Ware V; Raynor BD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 May; 182(5):1030-2. PubMed ID: 10819818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors affecting the likelihood of successful induction after intravaginal misoprostol application for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Tran S; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 186(6):1237-40; discussion 1240-3. PubMed ID: 12066104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison between sonographic cervical length and Bishop score in preinduction cervical assessment: a randomized trial.
    Park KH; Kim SN; Lee SY; Jeong EH; Jung HJ; Oh KJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Aug; 38(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21484904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Chang CH; Chang FM
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of Changes in Cervical Softness Using Shear Wave Speed in Early versus Late Pregnancy: An in Vivo Cross-Sectional Study.
    Carlson LC; Hall TJ; Rosado-Mendez IM; Palmeri ML; Feltovich H
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Mar; 44(3):515-521. PubMed ID: 29246767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical analysis of shear wave speed in the uterine cervix.
    Carlson LC; Feltovich H; Palmeri ML; del Rio AM; Hall TJ
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2014 Oct; 61(10):1651-60. PubMed ID: 25392863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Factors predicting unsuccessful labor induction with dinoprostone in post-term pregnancy with unfavorable cervix].
    Ducarme G; Chesnoy V; Petit L
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2015 Jan; 44(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 24239036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery.
    Tan PC; Vallikkannu N; Suguna S; Quek KF; Hassan J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 17444553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Induction of labor with misoprostol for premature rupture of membranes beyond thirty-six weeks' gestation.
    Wing DA; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jul; 179(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 9704771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bishop Score vs. ultrasound cervical length in the prediction of cervical ripening success and vaginal delivery in nulliparous women.
    Kehila M; Bougmiza I; Ben Hmid R; Abdelfatteh W; Mahjoub S; Channoufi MB
    Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Dec; 67(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 25964145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the Bishop score, body mass index and transvaginal cervical length in predicting the success of labor induction.
    Uyar Y; Erbay G; Demir BC; Baytur Y
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Sep; 280(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 19130065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.