These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25201232)

  • 1. Four osteotomy methods with piezosurgery to remove complicated mandibular third molars: a retrospective study.
    Ge J; Yang C; Zheng JW; He DM; Zheng LY; Hu YK
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 72(11):2126-33. PubMed ID: 25201232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Piezosurgery for the Lingual Split Technique in Lingual Positioned Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Removal: A Retrospective Study.
    Ge J; Yang C; Zheng J; Qian W
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Mar; 95(12):e3192. PubMed ID: 27015214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial to evaluate the performance of piezosurgery compared with traditional technique in lower wisdom tooth removal.
    Mantovani E; Arduino PG; Schierano G; Ferrero L; Gallesio G; Mozzati M; Russo A; Scully C; Carossa S
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 72(10):1890-7. PubMed ID: 25234524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy of the technique of piezoelectric corticotomy for orthodontic traction of impacted mandibular third molars.
    Ma Z; Xu G; Yang C; Xie Q; Shen Y; Zhang S
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 53(4):326-31. PubMed ID: 25638568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Piezoelectric device vs. conventional rotative instruments in impacted third molar surgery: relationships between surgical difficulty and postoperative pain with histological evaluations.
    Rullo R; Addabbo F; Papaccio G; D'Aquino R; Festa VM
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 41(2):e33-8. PubMed ID: 22890087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Piezoelectric Versus Conventional Rotary Techniques for Impacted Third Molar Extraction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Jiang Q; Qiu Y; Yang C; Yang J; Chen M; Zhang Z
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Oct; 94(41):e1685. PubMed ID: 26469902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Piezosurgery Versus Conventional Osteotomy: A Comparison of Techniques in the Extraction of Unerupted Mandibular Third Molars in Children.
    Yang L; Chen Y; Fang W
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jun; 80(6):1078-1083. PubMed ID: 35300957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of immediate post-extraction socket irrigation on development of alveolar osteitis after mandibular third molar removal: a prospective split-mouth study, preliminary report.
    Tolstunov L
    Br Dent J; 2012 Dec; 213(12):597-601. PubMed ID: 23257808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparison of piezosurgery and chisel osteotomy in the extraction of mandibular impacted third molars].
    Gao Y; Jiang A; Li B; Yang L
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 29(4):372-4. PubMed ID: 21932656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extraction of a deeply impacted lower third molar by sagittal split osteotomy.
    Sencimen M; Varol A; Gülses A; Altug HA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Nov; 108(5):e36-8. PubMed ID: 19836712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Complications of the mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy associated with the presence or absence of third molars.
    Mehra P; Castro V; Freitas RZ; Wolford LM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Aug; 59(8):854-8; discussion 859. PubMed ID: 11474434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modification of sagittal split ramus osteotomy to avoid unfavorable fracture around impacted third molars.
    Marquez IM; Stella JP
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1998; 13(3):183-7. PubMed ID: 9835817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Piezosurgery for the lingual split technique in mandibular third molar removal: a suggestion.
    Pippi R; Alvaro R
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 24(2):531-3. PubMed ID: 23524734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative Study of Piezoelectric and Rotary Osteotomy Technique for Third Molar Impaction.
    Basheer SA; Govind RJ; Daniel A; Sam G; Adarsh VJ; Rao A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Jan; 18(1):60-64. PubMed ID: 28050988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surgical extraction of deeply horizontally impacted mandibular second and third molars.
    Boffano P; Gallesio C; Bianchi F; Roccia F
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 21(2):403-6. PubMed ID: 20186075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Piezosurgery or conventional rotatory instruments for inferior third molar extractions?
    Piersanti L; Dilorenzo M; Monaco G; Marchetti C
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 72(9):1647-52. PubMed ID: 25109581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of clinical parameters and environmental noise levels between regular surgery and piezosurgery for extraction of impacted third molars.
    Chang HH; Lee MS; Hsu YC; Tsai SJ; Lin CP
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2015 Oct; 114(10):929-35. PubMed ID: 24661578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Piezosurgery versus conventional osteotomy: a randomized clinical trial on pain and anxiety in children with unerupted mandibular third molars.
    Yang L; Chen Y; Fang W
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Dec; 28(1):9. PubMed ID: 38127199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Removal of a deeply impacted mandibular third molar through a sagittal split ramus osteotomy approach.
    Jones TA; Garg T; Monaghan A
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Aug; 42(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 15225962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Removal of impacted mandibular third molars using an inward fragmentation technique (IFT) - Method and first results.
    Engelke W; Beltrán V; Cantín M; Choi EJ; Navarro P; Fuentes R
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 42(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 23850159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.