190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25202106)
1. Elderly women above screening age diagnosed with cervical cancer have a worse prognosis.
Darlin L; Borgfeldt C; Widén E; Kannisto P
Anticancer Res; 2014 Sep; 34(9):5147-51. PubMed ID: 25202106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differences in screening history, tumour characteristics and survival between women with screen-detected versus not screen-detected cervical cancer in the east of The Netherlands, 1992-2001.
van der Aa MA; Schutter EM; Looijen-Salamon M; Martens JE; Siesling S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Aug; 139(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 18093720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening patterns within organized programs and survival of Italian women with invasive cervical cancer.
Zucchetto A; Ronco G; Giorgi Rossi P; Zappa M; Ferretti S; Franzo A; Falcini F; Visioli CB; Zanetti R; Biavati P; La Rosa F; Baracco S; Federico M; Campari C; De Togni A; Piffer S; Pannozzo F; Fusco M; Michiara M; Castaing M; Seghini P; Tisano F; Serraino D;
Prev Med; 2013 Sep; 57(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 23732239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness of cervical screening after age 60 years according to screening history: Nationwide cohort study in Sweden.
Wang J; Andrae B; Sundström K; Ploner A; Ström P; Elfström KM; Dillner J; Sparén P
PLoS Med; 2017 Oct; 14(10):e1002414. PubMed ID: 29065127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. About invasive cervical cancer: a French population based study between 1998 and 2010.
Lorin L; Bertaut A; Hudry D; Beltjens F; Roignot P; Bone-Lepinoy MC; Douvier S; Arveux P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Aug; 191():1-6. PubMed ID: 26004674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Study on the value assessment of various screening programs regarding cervical cancer screening strategy in the rural areas of China].
Li LY; Qiao ZQ; Zhang MF; Yang JP; Bao YP; An YT; Lei J; Xiong NH; Yu XH; Zhang X; Pan QJ; Qiao YL
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 28(10):964-7. PubMed ID: 18399140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening history in women with cervical cancer in a Danish population-based screening program.
Kirschner B; Poll S; Rygaard C; Wåhlin A; Junge J
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Jan; 120(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 21035171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vascular endothelial growth factor, matrix metalloproteinases, and cyclooxygenase-2 influence prognosis of uterine cervical cancer in young women.
Noriyuki M; Sumi T; Zhi X; Misugi F; Nobeyama H; Yoshida H; Matsumoto Y; Yasui T; Honda K; Ishiko O
Int J Oncol; 2007 Sep; 31(3):531-6. PubMed ID: 17671679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical cancer screening in medically underserved California Latina and non-Latina women: effect of age and regularity of Pap testing.
Howell LP; Gurusinghe S; Tabnak F; Sciortino S
Cancer Detect Prev; 2009; 32(5-6):372-9. PubMed ID: 19264426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Cervical cancer has increased in Sweden in women who had a normal cell sample].
Dillner J; Sparén P; Andrae B; Strander B
Lakartidningen; 2018 Jun; 115():. PubMed ID: 29870048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screen-detected invasive cervical carcinoma and its clinical significance during the introduction of organized screening.
Herbert A; Anshu ; Gregory M; Gupta SS; Singh N
BJOG; 2009 May; 116(6):854-9. PubMed ID: 19371308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Cervical cancer before 35 years of age: epidemiological and prognostic aspects. Retrospective study of 46 cases of cervical cancer before 35 years of age in a series of 449 cases in stages IA2 and IV].
Saint-Paul MT; Brémond A; Rochet Y
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1993; 22(7):737-42. PubMed ID: 8308199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Incidence, mortality, and prognostic factors of small cell carcinoma of the cervix.
Chen J; Macdonald OK; Gaffney DK
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 111(6):1394-402. PubMed ID: 18515524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening history of women in Malmö with invasive cervical cancer.
Lindqvist PG; Hellsten C; Rippe A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Mar; 137(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 17210219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of causes of increased incidence of cervical cancer in Slovenia.
Smrkolj S; Rakar S; Mozina A; Erzen M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Dec; 117(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 15541860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mortality audit of the Finnish cervical cancer screening program.
Lönnberg S; Nieminen P; Luostarinen T; Anttila A
Int J Cancer; 2013 May; 132(9):2134-40. PubMed ID: 22987437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of histologic type and age on survival rates for invasive cervical carcinoma in Taiwan.
Chen RJ; Lin YH; Chen CA; Huang SC; Chow SN; Hsieh CY
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 May; 73(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 10329032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stage IIB-IVB cervical adenocarcinoma: prognostic factors and survival.
Lea JS; Sheets EE; Wenham RM; Duska LR; Coleman RL; Miller DS; Schorge JO
Gynecol Oncol; 2002 Jan; 84(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 11748986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The association between cervical cancer screening and mortality from cervical cancer: a population based case-control study.
Vicus D; Sutradhar R; Lu Y; Elit L; Kupets R; Paszat L;
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 May; 133(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 24589414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
