BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25202940)

  • 21. Nationwide trends in the surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Bae HW; Rajaee SS; Kanim LE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(11):916-26. PubMed ID: 23324922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. United States' trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992-2003.
    Weinstein JN; Lurie JD; Olson PR; Bronner KK; Fisher ES
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(23):2707-14. PubMed ID: 17077740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Impact of Resident Participation on Outcomes After Single-Level Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion: An Analysis of 3265 Patients from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
    Kim RB; Garcia RM; Smith ZA; Dahdaleh NS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Mar; 41(5):E289-96. PubMed ID: 26555830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Conventional Versus Stereotactic Image-guided Pedicle Screw Placement During Posterior Lumbar Fusions: A Retrospective Propensity Score-matched Study of a National Longitudinal Database.
    Pendharkar AV; Rezaii PG; Ho AL; Sussman ES; Veeravagu A; Ratliff JK; Desai AM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Nov; 44(21):E1272-E1280. PubMed ID: 31634303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Complications, Readmissions, and Revisions for Spine Procedures Performed by Orthopedic Surgeons Versus Neurosurgeons: A Retrospective, Longitudinal Study.
    Mabud T; Norden J; Veeravagu A; Swinney C; Cole T; McCutcheon BA; Ratliff J
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Dec; 30(10):E1376-E1381. PubMed ID: 27623297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Propensity-matched comparison of outcomes and cost after macroscopic and microscopic lumbar discectomy using a national longitudinal database.
    Pendharkar AV; Rezaii PG; Ho AL; Sussman ES; Purger DA; Veeravagu A; Ratliff JK; Desai AM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 May; 44(5):E12. PubMed ID: 29712527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Are current DRG-based bundled payment models for lumbar fusions risk-adjusting adequately? An analysis of Medicare beneficiaries.
    Malik AT; Phillips FM; Yu E; Khan SN
    Spine J; 2020 Jan; 20(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 31125696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparing Short-term Complications of Inpatient Versus Outpatient Single-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: An Analysis of 6940 Patients Using the ACS-NSQIP Database.
    Khanna R; Kim RB; Lam SK; Cybulski GR; Smith ZA; Dahdaleh NS
    Clin Spine Surg; 2018 Feb; 31(1):43-47. PubMed ID: 28079682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar herniated intervertebral disc disease: nationwide cohort study.
    Kim CH; Chung CK; Park CS; Choi B; Kim MJ; Park BJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Apr; 38(7):581-90. PubMed ID: 23023591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Complications after lumbar spine surgery between teaching and nonteaching hospitals.
    Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Fineberg SJ; Hassanzadeh H; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 24573073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Intraoperative Use of Neuromonitoring in Multilevel Thoracolumbar Spine Instrumentation and the Effects on Postoperative Neurological Injuries.
    Cheah J; Zhang AL; Tay B
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Aug; 30(7):321-327. PubMed ID: 27404856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Geographic variations in the cost of spine surgery.
    Goz V; Rane A; Abtahi AM; Lawrence BD; Brodke DS; Spiker WR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Sep; 40(17):1380-9. PubMed ID: 26076440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Is academic department teaching status associated with adverse outcomes after lumbar laminectomy and discectomy for degenerative spine diseases?
    Perfetti DC; Job AV; Satin AM; Katz AD; Silber JS; Essig DA
    Spine J; 2020 Sep; 20(9):1397-1402. PubMed ID: 32445804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Does the microendoscopic technique reduce mortality and major complications in patients undergoing lumbar discectomy? A propensity score-matched analysis using a nationwide administrative database.
    Ohya J; Oshima Y; Chikuda H; Oichi T; Matsui H; Fushimi K; Tanaka S; Yasunaga H
    Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Feb; 40(2):E5. PubMed ID: 26828886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Thirty-Day Morbidity After Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Identification of Risk Factors and Emphasis on the Safety of Outpatient Procedures.
    Martin CT; Pugely AJ; Gao Y; Mendoza-Lattes S
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Aug; 96(15):1288-1294. PubMed ID: 25100776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Obesity is associated with an increased rate of incidental durotomy in lumbar spine surgery.
    Burks CA; Werner BC; Yang S; Shimer AL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Apr; 40(7):500-4. PubMed ID: 25599288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Utilization Trends of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in New York State.
    Zelenty WD; Paek S; Dodo Y; Sarin M; Shue J; Soffin E; Lebl DR; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Sokunbi G; Sama AA; Hughes AP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2023 Apr; 48(7):492-500. PubMed ID: 36576864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of symptomatic cerebral spinal fluid leak between patients undergoing minimally invasive versus open lumbar foraminotomy, discectomy, or laminectomy.
    Wong AP; Shih P; Smith TR; Slimack NP; Dahdaleh NS; Aoun SG; El Ahmadieh TY; Smith ZA; Scheer JK; Koski TR; Liu JC; Fessler RG
    World Neurosurg; 2014; 81(3-4):634-40. PubMed ID: 24239738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of American Society of Anesthesiologists classification as 30-day morbidity predictor after single-level elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
    Lim S; Carabini LM; Kim RB; Khanna R; Dahdaleh NS; Smith ZA
    Spine J; 2017 Mar; 17(3):313-320. PubMed ID: 27669670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparative analysis of patients with cauda equina syndrome versus an unaffected population undergoing spinal surgery.
    Marascalchi BJ; Passias PG; Goz V; Weinreb JH; Joo L; Errico TJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(6):482-90. PubMed ID: 24365902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.