These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25203414)

  • 1. Inter-hemispheric dynamics revealed by reaction time in the Dimond paradigm.
    Leblanc-Sirois Y; Braun CM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(1):165-80. PubMed ID: 25203414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Homotopy and heterotopy and the bilateral field advantage in the Dimond paradigm.
    Desjardins S; Braun CM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Feb; 121(2):125-36. PubMed ID: 16137627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intra and inter hemispheric dynamics revealed by reaction time in the Dimond paradigm: a quantitative review of the literature.
    Leblanc-Sirois Y; Braun CM
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 May; 58():1-13. PubMed ID: 24699041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A choice reaction time index of callosal anatomical homotopy.
    Desjardins S; Braun CM; Achim A; Roberge C
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Oct; 71(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 19446944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age-related differences in interhemispheric visuomotor integration measured by the redundant target effect.
    Linnet E; Roser ME
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Jun; 27(2):399-409. PubMed ID: 21843007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Symmetrical hemispheric priming in spatial neglect: a hyperactive left-hemisphere phenomenon?
    Nakamura K; Oga T; Takahashi M; Kuribayashi T; Kanamori Y; Matsumiya T; Maeno Y; Yamamoto M
    Cortex; 2012 Apr; 48(4):421-8. PubMed ID: 21292251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interactions between task difficulty and hemispheric distribution of attended locations: implications for the splitting attention debate.
    Kraft A; Müller NG; Hagendorf H; Schira MM; Dick S; Fendrich RM; Brandt SA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 15922154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Callosal Sensitivity to Short-Range Stimulus Orientation and Long-Range Stimulus Context Orientation: Tachistoscopic Evidence.
    Braun CM; Achim A; Roberge C; Gauvin G
    Am J Psychol; 2015; 128(3):355-65. PubMed ID: 26442342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficiency of callosal transfer and hemispheric interaction.
    Cherbuin N; Brinkman C
    Neuropsychology; 2006 Mar; 20(2):178-84. PubMed ID: 16594778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The bilateral effect: callosal inhibition or intrahemispheric competition?
    Olk B; Hartje W
    Brain Cogn; 2001 Apr; 45(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 11305876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhanced redundancy gain in schizophrenics: a correlate of callosal dysfunction?
    Florio V; Marzi CA; Girelli A; Savazzi S
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Sep; 46(11):2808-15. PubMed ID: 18606425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sex differences in callosal transfer and hemispheric specialization for face coding.
    Proverbio AM; Mazzara R; Riva F; Manfredi M
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(9):2325-32. PubMed ID: 22727879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length during monocular viewing.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
    Cortex; 2010 Jan; 46(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 19147129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The association between stress, hemispheric specialization, and callosal interactions.
    Leavengood A; Weekes NY
    Brain Cogn; 2000; 43(1-3):306-10. PubMed ID: 10857714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of stimulus pair orientation and hand switching on reaction time estimates of interhemispheric transfer.
    Leblanc-Sirois Y; Braun CMJ; Elie-Fortier J
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jun; 236(6):1593-1602. PubMed ID: 29582107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Left-right asymmetry of callosal transfer in normal human subjects.
    Bisiacchi P; Marzi CA; Nicoletti R; Carena G; Mucignat C; Tomaiuolo F
    Behav Brain Res; 1994 Oct; 64(1-2):173-8. PubMed ID: 7840884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of temporal constraints on hemispheric asymmetries during spatial frequency processing.
    Peyrin C; Mermillod M; Chokron S; Marendaz C
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Dec; 62(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 16837115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Time-frequency analysis of visual evoked potentials for interhemispheric transfer time and proportion in callosal fibers of different diameters.
    Ulusoy I; Halici U; Nalçaci E; Anaç I; Leblebicio Eroğlu K; Başar-Eroğlu C
    Biol Cybern; 2004 Apr; 90(4):291-301. PubMed ID: 15085348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The superior colliculus subserves interhemispheric neural summation in both normals and patients with a total section or agenesis of the corpus callosum.
    Savazzi S; Marzi CA
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(12):1608-18. PubMed ID: 15327929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The modulation of stimulus structure on visual field asymmetry effects: the case of Chinese character recognition.
    Hsiao JH; Cheng L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Sep; 66(9):1739-55. PubMed ID: 23391072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.