BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25203489)

  • 1. A Prospective Randomized Comparison Between Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for Lower Caliceal Stones ≤2 cm: A Single-Center Experience.
    Kumar A; Vasudeva P; Nanda B; Kumar N; Das MK; Jha SK
    J Endourol; 2015 May; 29(5):575-9. PubMed ID: 25203489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective randomized comparison between shockwave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for upper ureteral stones <2 cm: a single center experience.
    Kumar A; Nanda B; Kumar N; Kumar R; Vasudeva P; Mohanty NK
    J Endourol; 2015 Jan; 29(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 23914770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Prospective Randomized Comparison Between Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy and Semirigid Ureteroscopy for Upper Ureteral Stones >2 cm: A Single-Center Experience.
    Kumar A; Vasudeva P; Nanda B; Kumar N; Jha SK; Singh H
    J Endourol; 2015 Nov; 29(11):1248-52. PubMed ID: 25177768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultra-Mini PCNL, Flexible Ureteroscopy, and Shock Wave Lithotripsy on the Treatment of 1-2 cm Lower Pole Renal Calculi.
    Zhang H; Hong TY; Li G; Jiang N; Hu C; Cui X; Chu C; Zhao JL
    Urol Int; 2019; 102(2):153-159. PubMed ID: 30352443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral calculi (<20 mm): a comparative matched-pair study.
    Youssef RF; El-Nahas AR; El-Assmy AM; El-Tabey NA; El-Hefnawy AS; Eraky I; El-Kenawy MR; El-Kappany HA; Sheir KZ
    Urology; 2009 Jun; 73(6):1184-7. PubMed ID: 19362338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness and efficiency of shockwave lithotripsy vs flexible ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole renal calculi.
    Koo V; Young M; Thompson T; Duggan B
    BJU Int; 2011 Dec; 108(11):1913-6. PubMed ID: 21453346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A prospective randomized comparison among SWL, PCNL and RIRS for lower calyceal stones less than 2 cm: a multicenter experience : A better understanding on the treatment options for lower pole stones.
    Bozzini G; Verze P; Arcaniolo D; Dal Piaz O; Buffi NM; Guazzoni G; Provenzano M; Osmolorskij B; Sanguedolce F; Montanari E; Macchione N; Pummer K; Mirone V; De Sio M; Taverna G
    World J Urol; 2017 Dec; 35(12):1967-1975. PubMed ID: 28875295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Single Center Experience Comparing Miniperc and Shockwave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Radiopaque 1-2 cm Lower Caliceal Renal Calculi in Children: A Prospective Randomized Study.
    Kumar A; Kumar N; Vasudeva P; Kumar R; Jha SK; Singh H
    J Endourol; 2015 Jul; 29(7):805-9. PubMed ID: 25633506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of large pediatric renal pelvic stone burden more than 2 cm.
    Mohamed ER; Elmogazy HM; Zanaty AK; Elsharkawi AM; Riad AM; Badawy AA
    J Pediatr Urol; 2023 Oct; 19(5):561.e1-561.e11. PubMed ID: 37414650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A prospective randomized comparison between early (<48 hours of onset of colicky pain) versus delayed shockwave lithotripsy for symptomatic upper ureteral calculi: a single center experience.
    Kumar A; Mohanty NK; Jain M; Prakash S; Arora RP
    J Endourol; 2010 Dec; 24(12):2059-66. PubMed ID: 20973739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy in patients with non-lower pole kidney stones under the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Bai S; Zhan Y; Pan C; Liu G; Li J; Shan L
    Urolithiasis; 2023 Feb; 51(1):38. PubMed ID: 36795174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for the management of renal stone burdens that measure 2 to 3 cm: a multi-institutional experience.
    Hyams ES; Munver R; Bird VG; Uberoi J; Shah O
    J Endourol; 2010 Oct; 24(10):1583-8. PubMed ID: 20629566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retrograde intrarenal surgery vs extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for intermediate size inferior pole calculi: a prospective assessment of objective and subjective outcomes.
    Singh BP; Prakash J; Sankhwar SN; Dhakad U; Sankhwar PL; Goel A; Kumar M
    Urology; 2014 May; 83(5):1016-22. PubMed ID: 24560970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for multiple unilateral intrarenal stones.
    Breda A; Ogunyemi O; Leppert JT; Schulam PG
    Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1190-6. PubMed ID: 18571315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Versus Shockwave Lithotripsy for Kidney Stones ≤2 cm: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Bosio A; Alessandria E; Dalmasso E; Agosti S; Vitiello F; Vercelli E; Bisconti A; Gontero P
    Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Nov; 8(6):1816-1822. PubMed ID: 35466071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Management of Upper Tract Urinary Stones in Children.
    Freton L; Peyronnet B; Arnaud A; Tondut L; Hascoet J; Pradère B; Verhoest G; Habonimana É; Azzis O; Fremond B; Bensalah K
    J Endourol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 27824261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of caliceal pelvic anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric lower pole stones.
    Onal B; Demirkesen O; Tansu N; Kalkan M; Altintaş R; Yalçin V
    J Urol; 2004 Sep; 172(3):1082-6. PubMed ID: 15311043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of semirigid ureteroscopy, flexible ureteroscopy, and shock wave lithotripsy for initial treatment of 11-20 mm proximal ureteral stones.
    Kartal I; Baylan B; Çakıcı MÇ; Sarı S; Selmi V; Ozdemir H; Yalçınkaya F
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2020 Apr; 92(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 32255321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones.
    Donaldson JF; Lardas M; Scrimgeour D; Stewart F; MacLennan S; Lam TB; McClinton S
    Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):612-6. PubMed ID: 25449204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retrograde intrarenal lithotripsy outcome after failure of shock wave lithotripsy.
    Stav K; Cooper A; Zisman A; Leibovici D; Lindner A; Siegel YI
    J Urol; 2003 Dec; 170(6 Pt 1):2198-201. PubMed ID: 14634378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.