These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25203584)

  • 1. Craniofacial morphologic parameters in a Persian population: an anthropometric study.
    Amini F; Mashayekhi Z; Rahimi H; Morad G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1874-81. PubMed ID: 25203584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Sudanese female face: normative craniofacial measurements and comparison with African-American and North American White females.
    Salah M; Higzi MA; Ali RW; Naini FB
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1704-9. PubMed ID: 25012648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of some facial anthropometric parameters in an Iranian population: infancy through adolescence.
    Jahanbin A; Rashed R; Yazdani R; Shahri NM; Kianifar H
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):941-5. PubMed ID: 23714916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anthropometric Analysis of the Face.
    Zacharopoulos GV; Manios A; Kau CH; Velagrakis G; Tzanakakis GN; de Bree E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 27(1):e71-5. PubMed ID: 26703056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Craniofacial anthropometric norms of Malays.
    Ngeow WC; Aljunid ST
    Singapore Med J; 2009 May; 50(5):525-8. PubMed ID: 19495526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vertical and horizontal neoclassical facial canons in Turkish young adults.
    Bozkir MG; Karakas P; Oguz O
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2004 Jun; 26(3):212-9. PubMed ID: 14625792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of facial anthropometric parameters in 11-17 year old boys.
    Jahanbin A; Mahdavishahri N; Baghayeripour M; Esmaily H; Eslami N
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2012; 37(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 23342574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proportion indices in the craniofacial regions of 284 healthy North American white children between 1 and 5 years of age.
    Farkas LG; Hreczko TM; Katic MJ; Forrest CR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Jan; 14(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 12544216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do the neoclassical canons still describe the beauty of faces? An anthropometric study on 50 Caucasian models.
    Torsello F; Mirigliani L; D'Alessio R; Deli R
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 20529624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Agreement between cranial and facial classification through clinical observation and anthropometric measurement among Envigado school children.
    Torres-Restrepo AM; Quintero-Monsalve AM; Giraldo-Mira JF; Rueda ZV; Vélez-Trujillo N; Botero-Mariaca P
    BMC Oral Health; 2014 May; 14():50. PubMed ID: 24886038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of soft-tissue morphology of the face in 1,050 young adults.
    Borman H; Ozgür F; Gürsu G
    Ann Plast Surg; 1999 Mar; 42(3):280-8. PubMed ID: 10096619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-dimensional analysis of facial morphology.
    Liu Y; Kau CH; Talbert L; Pan F
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1890-4. PubMed ID: 25072972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A 3D anthropometric analysis of the orolabial region in Chinese young adults.
    Jayaratne YS; Deutsch CK; Zwahlen RA
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 51(8):908-12. PubMed ID: 24094549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relation between anthropometric and cephalometric measurements and proportions of the face of healthy young white adult men and women.
    Budai M; Farkas LG; Tompson B; Katic M; Forrest CR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Mar; 14(2):154-61; discussion 162-3. PubMed ID: 12621284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of craniofacial characteristics of typical Chinese and Caucasian young adults.
    Gu Y; McNamara JA; Sigler LM; Baccetti T
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 20709723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Craniofacial anthropometric norms of Malaysian Indians.
    Ngeow WC; Aljunid ST
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 19884715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anthropometry of soft-tissue orbits in Bulgarian newborns: norms for intercanthal and biocular widths and length of palpebral fissures in 100 boys and 100 girls.
    Madjarova LM; Madzharov MM; Farkas LG; Katic MJ
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1999 Mar; 36(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 10213057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional facial distances of Northern Sudanese persons from childhood to young adulthood.
    Sforza C; Dolci C; Tommasi DG; Pisoni L; De Menezes M; Elamin F
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e318-26. PubMed ID: 24290254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Facial Anthropometric Proportion of Chinese Han Nationality.
    Yang YH; Wang B; Ding Y; Shi YW; Wang XG
    J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Jul; 30(5):1601-1604. PubMed ID: 31299778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional anthropometric analysis of chinese faces and its application in evaluating facial deformity.
    Dong Y; Zhao Y; Bai S; Wu G; Zhou L; Wang B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 69(4):1195-206. PubMed ID: 21050632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.