These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25203612)

  • 1. The importance of internal facial features in learning new faces.
    Longmore CA; Liu CH; Young AW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 25203612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An adaptation study of internal and external features in facial representations.
    Hills C; Romano K; Davies-Thompson J; Barton JJ
    Vision Res; 2014 Jul; 100():18-28. PubMed ID: 24747020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Internal versus external features in triggering the brain waveforms for conjunction and feature faces in recognition.
    Nie A; Jiang J; Fu Q
    Neuroreport; 2014 Aug; 25(12):965-71. PubMed ID: 25003951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Young children's difficulty in disregarding information from external features when matching unfamiliar faces.
    Sugimura T
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Oct; 116(2):296-308. PubMed ID: 23896414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitivity to feature displacement in familiar and unfamiliar faces: beyond the internal/external feature distinction.
    Brooks KR; Kemp RI
    Perception; 2007; 36(11):1646-59. PubMed ID: 18265845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring the motion advantage: evaluating the contribution of familiarity and differences in facial motion.
    Butcher N; Lander K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 May; 70(5):919-929. PubMed ID: 26822035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Internal and external features of the face are represented holistically in face-selective regions of visual cortex.
    Andrews TJ; Davies-Thompson J; Kingstone A; Young AW
    J Neurosci; 2010 Mar; 30(9):3544-52. PubMed ID: 20203214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: some implications for theories of face recognition.
    Ellis HD; Shepherd JW; Davies GM
    Perception; 1979; 8(4):431-9. PubMed ID: 503774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR; Burton AM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 18702593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gender-based prototype formation in face recognition.
    Baudouin JY; Brochard R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):888-98. PubMed ID: 21480752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does matching of internal and external facial features depend on orientation and viewpoint?
    Meinhardt-Injac B; Meinhardt G; Schwaninger A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Nov; 132(3):267-78. PubMed ID: 19712921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revisiting the processing of internal and external features of unfamiliar faces: the headscarf effect.
    Megreya AM; Bindemann M
    Perception; 2009; 38(12):1831-48. PubMed ID: 20192132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recognition of face and non-face stimuli in autistic spectrum disorder.
    Arkush L; Smith-Collins AP; Fiorentini C; Skuse DH
    Autism Res; 2013 Dec; 6(6):550-60. PubMed ID: 23894016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Caricature generalization benefits for faces learned with enhanced idiosyncratic shape or texture.
    Itz ML; Schweinberger SR; Kaufmann JM
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Feb; 17(1):185-197. PubMed ID: 27718208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The M170 reflects a viewpoint-dependent representation for both familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Ewbank MP; Smith WA; Hancock ER; Andrews TJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Feb; 18(2):364-70. PubMed ID: 17507454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recovering faces from memory: the distracting influence of external facial features.
    Frowd CD; Skelton F; Atherton C; Pitchford M; Hepton G; Holden L; McIntyre AH; Hancock PJ
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Jun; 18(2):224-38. PubMed ID: 22545929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 7-11-year-old children show an advantage for matching and recognizing the internal features of familiar faces: evidence against a developmental shift.
    Bonner L; Burton M
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Aug; 57(6):1019-29. PubMed ID: 15370514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features.
    Young AW; Hay DC; McWeeny KH; Flude BM; Ellis AW
    Perception; 1985; 14(6):737-46. PubMed ID: 3837875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The utility of multiple synthesized views in the recognition of unfamiliar faces.
    Jones SP; Dwyer DM; Lewis MB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 May; 70(5):906-918. PubMed ID: 26909545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual learning in face processing: comparison facilitates face recognition.
    Dwyer DM; Vladeanu M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Oct; 62(10):2055-67. PubMed ID: 19235097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.