These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25203902)

  • 1. Once and for all--how people change strategy to ignore irrelevant information in visual tasks.
    Gaschler R; Marewski JN; Frensch PA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(3):543-67. PubMed ID: 25203902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stimulus complexity effects on the event-related potentials to task-irrelevant stimuli.
    Barkaszi I; Czigler I; Balázs L
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Sep; 94(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 23702457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal characteristics of overt attentional behavior during category learning.
    Chen L; Meier KM; Blair MR; Watson MR; Wood MJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Feb; 75(2):244-56. PubMed ID: 23151960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Categorical implicit learning in real-world scenes: evidence from contextual cueing.
    Goujon A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):920-41. PubMed ID: 21161855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Learning to suppress task-irrelevant visual stimuli with attention.
    Vidnyánszky Z; Sohn W
    Vision Res; 2005 Mar; 45(6):677-85. PubMed ID: 15639494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selective attention to specific features within objects: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Nobre AC; Rao A; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):539-61. PubMed ID: 16768359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. More attention to attention? An eye-tracking investigation of selection of perceptual attributes during a task switch.
    Longman CS; Lavric A; Monsell S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1142-51. PubMed ID: 23088543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Learning to filter out visual distractors.
    Gál V; Kozák LR; Kóbor I; Bankó EM; Serences JT; Vidnyánszky Z
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 29(8):1723-31. PubMed ID: 19385991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic change detection during the performance of a continuous visual task.
    Tales A; Porter G; Butler S
    Neuroreport; 2009 Dec; 20(18):1638-42. PubMed ID: 19918204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual object representations can be formed outside the focus of voluntary attention: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Müller D; Winkler I; Roeber U; Schaffer S; Czigler I; Schröger E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1179-88. PubMed ID: 19445610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Processing of task-irrelevant natural scenes in social anxiety.
    Moriya J; Tanno Y
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):162-70. PubMed ID: 21696695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Learning by selection: visual search and object perception in young infants.
    Amso D; Johnson SP
    Dev Psychol; 2006 Nov; 42(6):1236-45. PubMed ID: 17087555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A unified model for perceptual learning.
    Seitz A; Watanabe T
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2005 Jul; 9(7):329-34. PubMed ID: 15955722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stimulus homogeneity enhances implicit learning: evidence from contextual cueing.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
    Vision Res; 2014 Apr; 97():108-16. PubMed ID: 24603347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Onset of background dynamic noise attenuates preview benefit in inefficient visual search.
    Osugi T; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2015 Jul; 112():33-44. PubMed ID: 25976299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
    Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What visual information do children and adults consider while switching between tasks? Eye-tracking investigation of cognitive flexibility development.
    Chevalier N; Blaye A; Dufau S; Lucenet J
    Dev Psychol; 2010 Jul; 46(4):955-72. PubMed ID: 20604615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pain draws visual attention to its location: experimental evidence for a threat-related bias.
    Van Damme S; Crombez G; Lorenz J
    J Pain; 2007 Dec; 8(12):976-82. PubMed ID: 17822961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.