These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2520504)

  • 1. Criteria for identifying and listing substances known to cause developmental toxicity under California's Proposition 65.
    Mattison DR; Hanson JW; Kochhar DM; Rao KS
    Reprod Toxicol; 1989; 3(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 2520504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Criteria for identifying and listing substances known to cause reproductive toxicity under California's Proposition 65.
    Mattison DR; Working PK; Blazak WF; Hughes CL; Killinger JM; Olive DL; Rao KS
    Reprod Toxicol; 1990; 4(3):163-75. PubMed ID: 2136034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. California's Proposition 65: extrapolating animal toxicity to humans.
    Kilgore WW
    Am J Ind Med; 1990; 18(4):491-4. PubMed ID: 2248253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. NTP-CERHR expert panel report on the reproductive and developmental toxicity of methanol.
    Shelby M; Portier C; Goldman L; Moore J; Iannucci A; Jahnke G; Donkin S;
    Reprod Toxicol; 2004 May; 18(3):303-90. PubMed ID: 15082073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proposition 65.
    Scialli AR
    Reprod Toxicol; 1989; 3(1):1. PubMed ID: 2578025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When scientists become policy makers: shaping hazard identification under Proposition 65.
    Pease W
    Reprod Toxicol; 1991; 5(3):169-73; discussion 175-8. PubMed ID: 1807551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk assessment for carcinogens under California's Proposition 65.
    Pease WS; Zeise L; Kelter A
    Risk Anal; 1990 Jun; 10(2):255-71. PubMed ID: 2367711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Threshold of toxicological concern for chemical substances present in the diet: a practical tool for assessing the need for toxicity testing.
    Kroes R; Galli C; Munro I; Schilter B; Tran L; Walker R; Würtzen G
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2000; 38(2-3):255-312. PubMed ID: 10717364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Chemical Health Effects Assessment Methodology for airborne contaminants.
    Brown HS; West CR; Bishop DR
    Risk Anal; 1987 Sep; 7(3):389-402. PubMed ID: 3685543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Safety assessment of poloxamers 101, 105, 108, 122, 123, 124, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 188, 212, 215, 217, 231, 234, 235, 237, 238, 282, 284, 288, 331, 333, 334, 335, 338, 401, 402, 403, and 407, poloxamer 105 benzoate, and poloxamer 182 dibenzoate as used in cosmetics.
    Singh-Joy SD; McLain VC
    Int J Toxicol; 2008; 27 Suppl 2():93-128. PubMed ID: 18830866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. QSAR screening of 70,983 REACH substances for genotoxic carcinogenicity, mutagenicity and developmental toxicity in the ChemScreen project.
    Wedebye EB; Dybdahl M; Nikolov NG; Jónsdóttir SÓ; Niemelä JR
    Reprod Toxicol; 2015 Aug; 55():64-72. PubMed ID: 25797653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry's 1997 priority list of hazardous substances. Latent effects--carcinogenesis, neurotoxicology, and developmental deficits in humans and animals.
    Ostrowski SR; Wilbur S; Chou CH; Pohl HR; Stevens YW; Allred PM; Roney N; Fay M; Tylenda CA
    Toxicol Ind Health; 1999 Nov; 15(7):602-44. PubMed ID: 10677885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. California's proposition 65.
    Abelson PH
    Science; 1987 Sep; 237(4822):1553. PubMed ID: 3629251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of maternal toxicity on the outcome of developmental toxicity studies.
    Paumgartten FJ
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2010; 73(13-14):944-51. PubMed ID: 20563928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Criteria for judging the relative toxicity of chemicals from developmental toxicity data: a workshop summary.
    Schwetz BA
    Teratology; 1992 Apr; 45(4):337-9. PubMed ID: 1350114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hazard and risk assessment of teratogenic chemicals under REACH.
    Prutner W
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 947():517-43. PubMed ID: 23138924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regulation of priority carcinogens and reproductive or developmental toxicants.
    Hooper K; LaDou J; Rosenbaum JS; Book SA
    Am J Ind Med; 1992; 22(6):793-808. PubMed ID: 1463026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The European Community Directive on the classification and labeling of chemicals for reproductive toxicity.
    Sullivan FM
    J Occup Environ Med; 1995 Aug; 37(8):966-9. PubMed ID: 8520962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Structure-based thresholds of toxicological concern (TTC): guidance for application to substances present at low levels in the diet.
    Kroes R; Renwick AG; Cheeseman M; Kleiner J; Mangelsdorf I; Piersma A; Schilter B; Schlatter J; van Schothorst F; Vos JG; Würtzen G;
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2004 Jan; 42(1):65-83. PubMed ID: 14630131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.