445 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25207394)
1. Efficiency of biological versus physical optimization for single-arc VMAT for prostate and head and neck cases.
Pyshniak V; Fotina I; Zverava A; Siamkouski S; Zayats E; Kopanitsa G; Okuntsau D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 15(4):4514. PubMed ID: 25207394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multicriteria optimization informed VMAT planning.
Chen H; Craft DL; Gierga DP
Med Dosim; 2014; 39(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 24360919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the feasibility of volumetric-modulated arc therapy using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB-VMAT): An analysis for complex head-neck, high-risk prostate and rectal cancer cases.
Cilla S; Deodato F; Digesù C; Macchia G; Picardi V; Ferro M; Sallustio G; De Spirito M; Piermattei A; Morganti AG
Med Dosim; 2014; 39(1):108-16. PubMed ID: 24342167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetric comparison of two treatment planning systems for spine SBRT.
Lee YK; Munawar I; Mashouf S; Sahgal A; Ruschin M
Med Dosim; 2020 Spring; 45(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 31376988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A dosimetric comparison of the use of equally spaced beam (ESB), beam angle optimization (BAO), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in head and neck cancers treated by intensity modulated radiotherapy.
Leung WS; Wu VWC; Liu CYW; Cheng ACK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 20(11):121-130. PubMed ID: 31593367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs. c-IMRT in esophageal cancer: a treatment planning comparison.
Yin L; Wu H; Gong J; Geng JH; Jiang F; Shi AH; Yu R; Li YH; Han SK; Xu B; Zhu GY
World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Oct; 18(37):5266-75. PubMed ID: 23066322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comprehensive comparison of IMRT and VMAT plan quality for prostate cancer treatment.
Quan EM; Li X; Li Y; Wang X; Kudchadker RJ; Johnson JL; Kuban DA; Lee AK; Zhang X
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Jul; 83(4):1169-78. PubMed ID: 22704703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric study of uniform scanning proton therapy planning for prostate cancer patients with a metal hip prosthesis, and comparison with volumetric-modulated arc therapy.
Rana S; Cheng C; Zheng Y; Hsi W; Zeidan O; Schreuder N; Vargas C; Larson G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 May; 15(3):4611. PubMed ID: 24892333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment planning comparison of IMPT, VMAT and 4π radiotherapy for prostate cases.
Tran A; Zhang J; Woods K; Yu V; Nguyen D; Gustafson G; Rosen L; Sheng K
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Jan; 12(1):10. PubMed ID: 28077128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and helical tomotherapy for prostate cancer using Pareto fronts.
Wüthrich D; Wang Z; Zeverino M; Bourhis J; Bochud F; Moeckli R
Med Phys; 2024 Apr; 51(4):3010-3019. PubMed ID: 38055371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A treatment planning study comparing Elekta VMAT and fixed field IMRT using the varian treatment planning system eclipse.
Peters S; Schiefer H; Plasswilm L
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jul; 9():153. PubMed ID: 25011529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric comparison of MR-linac-based IMRT and conventional VMAT treatment plans for prostate cancer.
Da Silva Mendes V; Nierer L; Li M; Corradini S; Reiner M; Kamp F; Niyazi M; Kurz C; Landry G; Belka C
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jul; 16(1):133. PubMed ID: 34289868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of photon-beam energy on VMAT and IMRT treatment plan quality and dosimetric accuracy for advanced prostate cancer.
Pasler M; Georg D; Wirtz H; Lutterbach J
Strahlenther Onkol; 2011 Dec; 187(12):792-8. PubMed ID: 22127357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. VMAT partial arc technique decreases dose to organs at risk in whole pelvic radiotherapy for prostate cancer when compared to full arc VMAT and IMRT.
Bartlett GK; Njeh CF; Huang KC; DesRosiers C; Guo G
Med Dosim; 2023 Spring; 48(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 36319515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of prostate VMAT plans optimized using the photon and progressive resolution algorithm.
Chow JCL; Jiang R; Xu L
Med Dosim; 2020 Spring; 45(1):14-18. PubMed ID: 31103251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of unified intensity-modulated arc therapy for the radiotherapy of head-and-neck cancer.
MacFarlane M; Hoover DA; Wong E; Read N; Palma D; Venkatesan V; Hammond A; Battista JJ; Chen JZ
Radiother Oncol; 2016 May; 119(2):331-6. PubMed ID: 27041142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rotational IMRT techniques compared to fixed gantry IMRT and tomotherapy: multi-institutional planning study for head-and-neck cases.
Wiezorek T; Brachwitz T; Georg D; Blank E; Fotina I; Habl G; Kretschmer M; Lutters G; Salz H; Schubert K; Wagner D; Wendt TG
Radiat Oncol; 2011 Feb; 6():20. PubMed ID: 21338501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of AAPM TG 119 to volumetric arc therapy (VMAT).
Mynampati DK; Yaparpalvi R; Hong L; Kuo HC; Mah D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 13(5):3382. PubMed ID: 22955639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy prostate cancer plans accounting for cold spots.
Nguyen TTT; Arimura H; Asamura R; Hirose TA; Ohga S; Fukunaga JI
Radiol Phys Technol; 2019 Jun; 12(2):137-148. PubMed ID: 30805779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of treatment plan quality of IMRT and VMAT with and without flattening filter using Pareto optimal fronts.
Lechner W; Kragl G; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2013 Dec; 109(3):437-41. PubMed ID: 24183067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
