132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25207566)
1. Evaluation of organ doses and effective dose according to the ICRP Publication 110 reference male/female phantom and the modified ImPACT CT patient dosimetry.
Kobayashi M; Asada Y; Matsubara K; Matsunaga Y; Kawaguchi A; Katada K; Toyama H; Koshida K; Suzuki S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 15(5):4823. PubMed ID: 25207566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Organ doses, effective doses, and risk indices in adult CT: comparison of four types of reference phantoms across different examination protocols.
Zhang Y; Li X; Segars WP; Samei E
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3404-23. PubMed ID: 22755721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact on 141Ce, 144Ce, 95Zr, and 90Sr beta emitter dose coefficients of photon and electron SAFs calculated with ICRP/ICRU reference adult voxel computational phantoms.
Li WB; Zankl M; Schlattl H; Petoussi-Henss N; Eckerman KF; Bolch WE; Oeh U; Hoeschen C
Health Phys; 2010 Oct; 99(4):503-10. PubMed ID: 20838091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Organ dose conversion coefficients for voxel models of the reference male and female from idealized photon exposures.
Schlattl H; Zankl M; Petoussi-Henss N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2123-45. PubMed ID: 17404459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Organ doses for reference pediatric and adolescent patients undergoing computed tomography estimated by Monte Carlo simulation.
Lee C; Kim KP; Long DJ; Bolch WE
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):2129-46. PubMed ID: 22482634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A tomographic physical phantom of the newborn child with real-time dosimetry. II. Scaling factors for calculation of mean organ dose in pediatric radiography.
Staton RJ; Jones AK; Lee C; Hintenlang DE; Arreola MM; Williams JL; Bolch WE
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3283-9. PubMed ID: 17022223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Monte Carlo-based method to estimate radiation dose from spiral CT: from phantom testing to patient-specific models.
Jarry G; DeMarco JJ; Beifuss U; Cagnon CH; McNitt-Gray MF
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Aug; 48(16):2645-63. PubMed ID: 12974580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of effective dose conversion coefficients for Korean adults during medical x-ray examinations up to 150 keV through comparison with ICRP Publication 74 and ICRP Publication 116.
Keum M; Park JH; Park SH; Ahn SD
J Radiol Prot; 2014 Mar; 34(1):191-9. PubMed ID: 24441918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hybrid computational phantoms of the 15-year male and female adolescent: applications to CT organ dosimetry for patients of variable morphometry.
Lee C; Lodwick D; Williams JL; Bolch WE
Med Phys; 2008 Jun; 35(6):2366-82. PubMed ID: 18649470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating Effective Dose of Radiation From Pediatric Cardiac CT Angiography Using a 64-MDCT Scanner: New Conversion Factors Relating Dose-Length Product to Effective Dose.
Trattner S; Chelliah A; Prinsen P; Ruzal-Shapiro CB; Xu Y; Jambawalikar S; Amurao M; Einstein AJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Mar; 208(3):585-594. PubMed ID: 28095022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiation dose for body CT protocols: variability of scanners at one institution.
Jaffe TA; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G; Anderson-Evans C; Lowry C; Miller CM; Nelson RC; Ravin CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):1141-7. PubMed ID: 19770340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 2007 recommendations of the ICRP change basis for estimation of the effective dose: what is the impact on radiation dose assessment of patient and personnel?
Boetticher Hv; Lachmund J; Looe HK; Hoffmann W; Poppe B
Rofo; 2008 May; 180(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 18438741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness of protective patient equipment for CT: an anthropomorphic phantom study.
Ott B; Stüssi A; Mini R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Dec; 142(2-4):213-21. PubMed ID: 20829205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of absorbed and effective doses to patients from radiopharmaceuticals using the ICRP 110 reference computational phantoms and ICRP 103 formulation.
Hadid L; Gardumi A; Desbrée A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Sep; 156(2):141-59. PubMed ID: 23525914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Organ and effective doses in newborn patients during helical multislice computed tomography examination.
Staton RJ; Lee C; Lee C; Williams MD; Hintenlang DE; Arreola MM; Williams JL; Bolch WE
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5151-66. PubMed ID: 17019030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conversion of ICRP male reference phantom to polygon-surface phantom.
Yeom YS; Han MC; Kim CH; Jeong JH
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 58(19):6985-7007. PubMed ID: 24029733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of a generalized method to allow the estimation of doses to the ICRP reference adults from CT, on the basis of normalized organ and CTDI dose data determined by Monte Carlo calculation for a range of contemporary scanners.
Jansen JT; Shrimpton PC; Edyvean S
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Feb; 68(3):. PubMed ID: 36634363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of head and body organ doses in CT.
Huda W; Ogden KM
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(2):N9-N14. PubMed ID: 18184987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiation exposure during transmission measurements: comparison between CT- and germanium-based techniques with a current PET scanner.
Wu TH; Huang YH; Lee JJ; Wang SY; Wang SC; Su CT; Chen LK; Chu TC
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2004 Jan; 31(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 14534833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A phantom for effective dose measurement: organ dose distribution assessment based on a numerical approach.
Furstoss C; Ménard S; Clairand I; Chau Q
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):180-4. PubMed ID: 17675663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
