These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25207956)

  • 1. Reducing the cost of Ca-based direct air capture of CO2.
    Zeman F
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Oct; 48(19):11730-5. PubMed ID: 25207956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electricity from fossil fuels without CO2 emissions: assessing the costs of carbon dioxide capture and sequestration in U.S. electricity markets.
    Johnson TL; Keith DW
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2001 Oct; 51(10):1452-9. PubMed ID: 11686250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Carbon dioxide capture from atmospheric air using sodium hydroxide spray.
    Stolaroff JK; Keith DW; Lowry GV
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Apr; 42(8):2728-35. PubMed ID: 18497115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reducing CO2 emissions and energy consumption of heat-integrated distillation systems.
    Gadalla MA; Olujic Z; Jansens PJ; Jobson M; Smith R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Sep; 39(17):6860-70. PubMed ID: 16190250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Separation and capture of CO2 from large stationary sources and sequestration in geological formations--coalbeds and deep saline aquifers.
    White CM; Strazisar BR; Granite EJ; Hoffman JS; Pennline HW;
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 Jun; 53(6):645-715. PubMed ID: 12828330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The urgency of the development of CO2 capture from ambient air.
    Lackner KS; Brennan S; Matter JM; Park AH; Wright A; van der Zwaan B
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Aug; 109(33):13156-62. PubMed ID: 22843674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Costs for integrating wind into the future ERCOT system with related costs for savings in CO2 emissions.
    Lu X; McElroy MB; Sluzas NA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Apr; 45(7):3160-6. PubMed ID: 21375280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A technical, economic, and environmental assessment of amine-based CO2 capture technology for power plant greenhouse gas control.
    Rao AB; Rubin ES
    Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Oct; 36(20):4467-75. PubMed ID: 12387425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are renewables portfolio standards cost-effective emission abatement policy?
    Dobesova K; Apt J; Lave LB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Nov; 39(22):8578-83. PubMed ID: 16323750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Advancing adsorption and membrane separation processes for the gigaton carbon capture challenge.
    Wilcox J; Haghpanah R; Rupp EC; He J; Lee K
    Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng; 2014; 5():479-505. PubMed ID: 24702296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reassessing the Efficiency Penalty from Carbon Capture in Coal-Fired Power Plants.
    Supekar SD; Skerlos SJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Oct; 49(20):12576-84. PubMed ID: 26422409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure jeopardize 1.5 °C climate target.
    Tong D; Zhang Q; Zheng Y; Caldeira K; Shearer C; Hong C; Qin Y; Davis SJ
    Nature; 2019 Aug; 572(7769):373-377. PubMed ID: 31261374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implications of the recent reductions in natural gas prices for emissions of CO2 from the US power sector.
    Lu X; Salovaara J; McElroy MB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(5):3014-21. PubMed ID: 22321206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electricity generation: options for reduction in carbon emissions.
    Whittington HW
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2002 Aug; 360(1797):1653-68. PubMed ID: 12460490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of potential carbon dioxide reductions due to biomass-coal cofiring in the United States.
    Robinson AL; Rhodes JS; Keith DW
    Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Nov; 37(22):5081-9. PubMed ID: 14655692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Opportunity for offshore wind to reduce future demand for coal-fired power plants in China with consequent savings in emissions of CO2.
    Lu X; McElroy MB; Chen X; Kang C
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Dec; 48(24):14764-71. PubMed ID: 25409413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Co-location of air capture, subseafloor CO2 sequestration, and energy production on the Kerguelen plateau.
    Goldberg DS; Lackner KS; Han P; Slagle AL; Wang T
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Jul; 47(13):7521-9. PubMed ID: 23745611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Energy and material balance of CO2 capture from ambient air.
    Zeman F
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Nov; 41(21):7558-63. PubMed ID: 18044541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The environmental and economic sustainability of carbon capture and storage.
    Hardisty PE; Sivapalan M; Brooks P
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2011 May; 8(5):1460-77. PubMed ID: 21655130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost Analysis of Carbon Capture and Sequestration from U.S. Natural Gas-Fired Power Plants.
    Psarras P; He J; Pilorgé H; McQueen N; Jensen-Fellows A; Kian K; Wilcox J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 May; 54(10):6272-6280. PubMed ID: 32329614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.