439 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25208243)
21. A combined reconstruction-classification method for diffuse optical tomography.
Hiltunen P; Prince SJ; Arridge S
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Nov; 54(21):6457-76. PubMed ID: 19820265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An adaptive regularization parameter choice strategy for multispectral bioluminescence tomography.
Feng J; Qin C; Jia K; Han D; Liu K; Zhu S; Yang X; Tian J
Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):5933-44. PubMed ID: 22047358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Implementation of edge-preserving regularization for frequency-domain diffuse optical tomography.
Chen LY; Pan MC; Pan MC
Appl Opt; 2012 Jan; 51(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 22270412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Noise suppression for dual-energy CT via penalized weighted least-square optimization with similarity-based regularization.
Harms J; Wang T; Petrongolo M; Niu T; Zhu L
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2676. PubMed ID: 27147376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sparsity enhanced spatial resolution and depth localization in diffuse optical tomography.
Kavuri VC; Lin ZJ; Tian F; Liu H
Biomed Opt Express; 2012 May; 3(5):943-57. PubMed ID: 22567587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Combining energy and Laplacian regularization to accurately retrieve the depth of brain activity of diffuse optical tomographic data.
Chiarelli AM; Maclin EL; Low KA; Mathewson KE; Fabiani M; Gratton G
J Biomed Opt; 2016 Mar; 21(3):36008. PubMed ID: 26987429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Low-dose CT reconstruction via L1 dictionary learning regularization using iteratively reweighted least-squares.
Zhang C; Zhang T; Li M; Peng C; Liu Z; Zheng J
Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Jun; 15(1):66. PubMed ID: 27316680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Sparse-view computed tomography image reconstruction via a combination of L(1) and SL(0) regularization.
Qi H; Chen Z; Guo J; Zhou L
Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S1389-98. PubMed ID: 26405900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Application of weighted minimum-norm estimation with Tikhonov regularization for neuromagnetic source imaging].
Hu J; Hu J; Wang Y
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Mar; 20(1):157-61. PubMed ID: 12744189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Weight-matrix structured regularization provides optimal generalized least-squares estimate in diffuse optical tomography.
Yalavarthy PK; Pogue BW; Dehghani H; Paulsen KD
Med Phys; 2007 Jun; 34(6):2085-98. PubMed ID: 17654912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Data-resolution based optimal choice of minimum required measurements for image-guided diffuse optical tomography.
Prakash J; Yalavarthy PK
Opt Lett; 2013 Jan; 38(2):88-90. PubMed ID: 23454924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Multi-subject and multi-task experimental validation of the hierarchical Bayesian diffuse optical tomography algorithm.
Yamashita O; Shimokawa T; Aisu R; Amita T; Inoue Y; Sato MA
Neuroimage; 2016 Jul; 135():287-99. PubMed ID: 27150232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Mixed Total Variation and
Tang J; Han B; Han W; Bi B; Li L
Comput Math Methods Med; 2017; 2017():2953560. PubMed ID: 28280517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effective contrast recovery in rapid dynamic near-infrared diffuse optical tomography using ℓ(1)-norm-based linear image reconstruction method.
Shaw CB; Yalavarthy PK
J Biomed Opt; 2012 Aug; 17(8):086009. PubMed ID: 23224196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Portable, field-based neuroimaging using high-density diffuse optical tomography.
Fishell AK; Arbeláez AM; Valdés CP; Burns-Yocum TM; Sherafati A; Richter EJ; Torres M; Eggebrecht AT; Smyser CD; Culver JP
Neuroimage; 2020 Jul; 215():116541. PubMed ID: 31987995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Diffuse optical tomography enhanced by clustered sparsity for functional brain imaging.
Chen C; Tian F; Liu H; Huang J
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2014 Dec; 33(12):2323-31. PubMed ID: 25055380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Sparse reconstruction for quantitative bioluminescence tomography based on the incomplete variables truncated conjugate gradient method.
He X; Liang J; Wang X; Yu J; Qu X; Wang X; Hou Y; Chen D; Liu F; Tian J
Opt Express; 2010 Nov; 18(24):24825-41. PubMed ID: 21164828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Performance evaluation of typical approximation algorithms for nonconvex ℓp-minimization in diffuse optical tomography.
Shaw CB; Yalavarthy PK
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2014 Apr; 31(4):852-62. PubMed ID: 24695149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Mathematical and numerical challenges in optical screening of female breast.
Causin P; Lupieri MG; Naldi G; Weishaeupl RM
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2020 Feb; 36(2):e3286. PubMed ID: 31733636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Sampling scheme optimization for diffuse optical tomography based on data and image space rankings.
Sabir S; Kim C; Cho S; Heo D; Kim KH; Ye JC; Cho S
J Biomed Opt; 2016 Oct; 21(10):106004. PubMed ID: 27775749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
