These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25208902)

  • 1. Using 7.5 frames per second reduces radiation exposure in lower extremity peripheral vascular interventions.
    Akkus NI; Mina GS; Abdulbaki A; Shafiei F; Tandon N
    Vascular; 2015 Jun; 23(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 25208902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How Slow Can We Go? 4 Frames Per Second (fps) Versus 7.5 fps Fluoroscopy for Atrial Septal Defects (ASDs) Device Closure.
    Hiremath G; Meadows J; Moore P
    Pediatr Cardiol; 2015 Jun; 36(5):1057-61. PubMed ID: 25618164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of low rate fluoroscopy at reducing operator and patient radiation dose during transradial coronary angiography and interventions.
    Abdelaal E; Plourde G; MacHaalany J; Arsenault J; Rimac G; Déry JP; Barbeau G; Larose E; De Larochellière R; Nguyen CM; Allende R; Ribeiro H; Costerousse O; Mongrain R; Bertrand OF;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 7(5):567-74. PubMed ID: 24746649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implementation of a Low Frame-Rate Protocol and Noise-Reduction Technology to Minimize Radiation Dose in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Maccagni D; Candilio L; Latib A; Godino C; Chieffo A; Montorfano M; Colombo A; Azzalini L
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 May; 30(5):169-175. PubMed ID: 29715165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of a dose-dependent follow-up protocol and mechanisms to reduce patients and staff radiation exposure in congenital and structural interventions.
    Sawdy JM; Kempton TM; Olshove V; Gocha M; Chisolm JL; Hill SL; Kirk A; Cheatham JP; Holzer RJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Jul; 78(1):136-42. PubMed ID: 21681901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reducing Fluoroscopic Radiation Exposure During Endomyocardial Biopsy in Pediatric Transplant Recipients.
    Gossett JG; Sammet CL; Agrawal A; Rychlik K; Wax DF
    Pediatr Cardiol; 2017 Feb; 38(2):308-313. PubMed ID: 27878626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determinants of operator and patient radiation exposure during cardiac catheterization: Insights from the RadiCure (RADIation reduction during cardiac catheterization using real-timE monitoring) trial.
    Christopoulos G; Papayannis AC; Alomar M; Christakopoulos GE; Kotsia A; Michael TT; Rangan BV; Roesle M; Shorrock D; Makke L; Maragkoudakis S; Mohammad A; Sarode K; Chambers CE; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Dec; 88(7):1046-1055. PubMed ID: 26707858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fluoroscopy time is not accurate as a surrogate for radiation exposure.
    Skripochnik E; Loh SA
    Vascular; 2017 Oct; 25(5):466-471. PubMed ID: 28304221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pediatric patient radiation dosage during endomyocardial biopsies and right heart catheterization using a standard "ALARA" radiation reduction protocol in the modern fluoroscopic era.
    Sutton NJ; Lamour J; Gellis LA; Pass RH
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 83(1):80-3. PubMed ID: 23765986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pulse fluoroscopy radiation reduction in a pediatric cardiac catheterization laboratory.
    Covi SH; Whiteside W; Yu S; Zampi JD
    Congenit Heart Dis; 2015; 10(2):E43-7. PubMed ID: 24965688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reducing radiation exposure by lowering frame rate in children undergoing cardiac catheterization: A quality improvement study.
    Amdani SM; Ross RD; Webster PA; Turner DR; Forbes TJ; Kobayashi D
    Congenit Heart Dis; 2018 Nov; 13(6):1028-1037. PubMed ID: 30280489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiation Exposure during Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty for Symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease.
    Sigterman TA; Bolt LJ; Snoeijs MG; Krasznai AG; Heijboer R; Schurink GW; Bouwman LH
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2016 May; 33():167-72. PubMed ID: 26902938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Effect of Low Frame Rate Fluoroscopy on the X-ray Dose during Coronary Intervention.
    Sadamatsu K; Nakano Y
    Intern Med; 2016; 55(15):1943-6. PubMed ID: 27477397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiation dose reduction in the cardiac catheterization laboratory utilizing a novel protocol.
    Wassef AW; Hiebert B; Ravandi A; Ducas J; Minhas K; Vo M; Kass M; Parmar G; Hussain F
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 7(5):550-7. PubMed ID: 24746655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is it possible to reduce radiation exposure during transcatheter atrial septal defect closure in children?
    Tanıdır İC; Gökalp S; Özturk E; Çilsal E; Topkarcı MA; Guzeltaş A
    Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars; 2020 Nov; 48(8):760-765. PubMed ID: 33257613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Operator radiation exposure and physical discomfort during a right versus left radial approach for coronary interventions: a randomized evaluation.
    Kado H; Patel AM; Suryadevara S; Zenni MM; Box LC; Angiolillo DJ; Bass TA; Guzman LA
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jul; 7(7):810-6. PubMed ID: 24954573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata: optimization of the radiation dose to the patient using a flat-panel detector angiographic suite.
    Sapoval M; Pellerin O; Rehel JL; Houdoux N; Rahmoune G; Aubert B; Fitton I
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2010 Oct; 33(5):949-54. PubMed ID: 20094719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multimodality 3D-roadmap for cardiovascular interventions in congenital heart disease--a single-center, retrospective analysis of 78 cases.
    Glöckler M; Halbfaβ J; Koch A; Achenbach S; Dittrich S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 82(3):436-42. PubMed ID: 22936634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Randomized comparison of operator radiation exposure during coronary angiography and intervention by radial or femoral approach.
    Lange HW; von Boetticher H
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Jan; 67(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 16331696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. X-ray magnetic resonance fusion modality may reduce radiation exposure and contrast dose in diagnostic cardiac catheterization of congenital heart disease.
    Abu Hazeem AA; Dori Y; Whitehead KK; Harris MA; Fogel MA; Gillespie MJ; Rome JJ; Glatz AC
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Nov; 84(5):795-800. PubMed ID: 24619541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.