405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25208949)
1. Correlation between oropharyngeal pH-monitoring and esophageal pH-impedance monitoring in patients with suspected GERD-related extra-esophageal symptoms.
Mazzoleni G; Vailati C; Lisma DG; Testoni PA; Passaretti S
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2014 Nov; 26(11):1557-64. PubMed ID: 25208949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gastroesophageal reflux evaluation in patients affected by chronic cough: Restech versus multichannel intraluminal impedance/pH metry.
Ummarino D; Vandermeulen L; Roosens B; Urbain D; Hauser B; Vandenplas Y
Laryngoscope; 2013 Apr; 123(4):980-4. PubMed ID: 23023943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How many cases of laryngopharyngeal reflux suspected by laryngoscopy are gastroesophageal reflux disease-related?
de Bortoli N; Nacci A; Savarino E; Martinucci I; Bellini M; Fattori B; Ceccarelli L; Costa F; Mumolo MG; Ricchiuti A; Savarino V; Berrettini S; Marchi S
World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Aug; 18(32):4363-70. PubMed ID: 22969200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnosis of supra-esophageal gastric reflux: correlation of oropharyngeal pH with esophageal impedance monitoring for gastro-esophageal reflux.
Chiou E; Rosen R; Jiang H; Nurko S
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2011 Aug; 23(8):717-e326. PubMed ID: 21592256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparative study on 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring and Dx-pH monitoring in the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux].
Wang JS; Li JR
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Apr; 53(4):270-275. PubMed ID: 29747251
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Dual pH Probes Without Proximal Esophageal and Pharyngeal Impedance May Be Deficient in Diagnosing LPR.
Borges LF; Chan WW; Carroll TL
J Voice; 2019 Sep; 33(5):697-703. PubMed ID: 30082108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simultaneous laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring (Restech) and conventional esophageal pH monitoring-correlation using a large patient cohort of more than 100 patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Fuchs HF; Müller DT; Berlth F; Maus MK; Fuchs C; Dübbers M; Schröder W; Bruns CJ; Leers JM
Dis Esophagus; 2018 Oct; 31(10):. PubMed ID: 29534167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. First agreement analysis and day-to-day comparison of pharyngeal pH monitoring with pH/impedance monitoring in patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux.
Becker V; Graf S; Schlag C; Schuster T; Feussner H; Schmid RM; Bajbouj M
J Gastrointest Surg; 2012 Jun; 16(6):1096-101. PubMed ID: 22450948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Wireless 24, 48, and 96 Hour or Impedance or Oropharyngeal Prolonged pH Monitoring: Which Test, When, and Why for GERD?
Chae S; Richter JE
Curr Gastroenterol Rep; 2018 Sep; 20(11):52. PubMed ID: 30259210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual pH with Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance Testing in the Evaluation of Subjective Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms.
Cumpston EC; Blumin JH; Bock JM
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Dec; 155(6):1014-1020. PubMed ID: 27554506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring and reflux scintigraphy in pediatric patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux.
Uslu Kızılkan N; Bozkurt MF; Saltık Temizel IN; Demir H; Yüce A; Caner B; Özen H
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Nov; 22(43):9595-9603. PubMed ID: 27920480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combined esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring (MII -pH) in the diagnostics and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications.
Masiak W; Wallner G; Wallner J; Pedowski T; Solecki M
Pol Przegl Chir; 2011 Sep; 83(9):488-96. PubMed ID: 22166737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Oropharyngeal pH monitoring for the detection of liquid and aerosolized supraesophageal gastric reflux.
Wiener GJ; Tsukashima R; Kelly C; Wolf E; Schmeltzer M; Bankert C; Fisk L; Vaezi M
J Voice; 2009 Jul; 23(4):498-504. PubMed ID: 18468849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Results of multichannel intraluminal impedance pH metry in symptomathic children with normal pH metry findings.
Soyer T; Gulerman F; Boybeyi O; Aslan M; Gunal Y
Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2014 Dec; 24(6):514-8. PubMed ID: 24000129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Twenty-four-hour esophageal impedance-pH monitoring in healthy preterm neonates: rate and characteristics of acid, weakly acidic, and weakly alkaline gastroesophageal reflux.
López-Alonso M; Moya MJ; Cabo JA; Ribas J; del Carmen Macías M; Silny J; Sifrim D
Pediatrics; 2006 Aug; 118(2):e299-308. PubMed ID: 16831894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can acid (pH) refluxes predict multichannel intraluminal impedance refluxes? A correlation study.
Misra S
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2010 Apr; 25(4):817-22. PubMed ID: 20492340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation of Esophageal Mean Nocturnal Baseline Impedance With Markers of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.
Kurylo CM; Eastwood D; Blumin JH; Johnston N; Bock JM
Laryngoscope; 2023 Aug; 133(8):1927-1932. PubMed ID: 36196929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes in Pharyngeal Baseline Impedance in Patients With Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.
Doo JG; Kim SI; Park JM; Kwon OE; Lee YC; Eun YG
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Sep; 163(3):563-568. PubMed ID: 32396492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Proton pump inhibitor responders who are not confirmed as GERD patients with impedance and pH monitoring: who are they?
de Bortoli N; Martinucci I; Savarino E; Bellini M; Bredenoord AJ; Franchi R; Bertani L; Furnari M; Savarino V; Blandizzi C; Marchi S
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2014 Jan; 26(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 23992024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of esophageal pH and multichannel intraluminal impedance testing in pediatric patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux.
Francavilla R; Magistà AM; Bucci N; Villirillo A; Boscarelli G; Mappa L; Leone G; Fico S; Castellaneta S; Indrio F; Lionetti E; Moramarco F; Cavallo L
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2010 Feb; 50(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 19680154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
