253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25209168)
1. Using response-time latencies to measure athletes' doping attitudes: the brief implicit attitude test identifies substance abuse in bodybuilders.
Brand R; Wolff W; Thieme D
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2014 Sep; 9():36. PubMed ID: 25209168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Illegal performance enhancing drugs and doping in sport: a picture-based brief implicit association test for measuring athletes' attitudes.
Brand R; Heck P; Ziegler M
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2014 Jan; 9():7. PubMed ID: 24479865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Doping in sport: a review of elite athletes' attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge.
Morente-Sánchez J; Zabala M
Sports Med; 2013 Jun; 43(6):395-411. PubMed ID: 23532595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of implicitly incentivized faking on explicit and implicit measures of doping attitude: when athletes want to pretend an even more negative attitude to doping.
Wolff W; Schindler S; Brand R
PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0118507. PubMed ID: 25902142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implicit versus explicit attitude to doping: Which better predicts athletes' vigilance towards unintentional doping?
Chan DKC; Keatley DA; Tang TCW; Dimmock JA; Hagger MS
J Sci Med Sport; 2018 Mar; 21(3):238-244. PubMed ID: 28622975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness of the world anti-doping agency's e-learning programme for anti-doping education on knowledge of, explicit and implicit attitudes towards, and likelihood of doping among Chinese college athletes and non-athletes.
Deng Z; Guo J; Wang D; Huang T; Chen Z
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2022 Apr; 17(1):31. PubMed ID: 35473803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Korean national athletes' knowledge, practices, and attitudes of doping: a cross-sectional study.
Kim T; Kim YH
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2017 Feb; 12(1):7. PubMed ID: 28196542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Capturing doping attitudes by self-report declarations and implicit assessment: a methodology study.
Petróczi A; Aidman EV; Nepusz T
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2008 Apr; 3():9. PubMed ID: 18426575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clean Olympians? Doping and anti-doping: the views of talented young British athletes.
Bloodworth A; McNamee M
Int J Drug Policy; 2010 Jul; 21(4):276-82. PubMed ID: 20056401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Self-reported attitudes of elite athletes towards doping: differences between type of sport.
Alaranta A; Alaranta H; Holmila J; Palmu P; Pietilä K; Helenius I
Int J Sports Med; 2006 Oct; 27(10):842-6. PubMed ID: 16586338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Geographical heterogeneity of doping-related knowledge, beliefs and attitude among 533 Youth Olympics participants.
Königstein K; Gatterer K; Weber K; Schmidt-Trucksäss A; Tercier S; Blank C
J Sci Med Sport; 2021 Nov; 24(11):1116-1122. PubMed ID: 34176766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Psychological and social correlates of doping attitudes among Italian athletes.
Zucchetti G; Candela F; Villosio C
Int J Drug Policy; 2015 Feb; 26(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 25168080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Attitudes and doping: a structural equation analysis of the relationship between athletes' attitudes, sport orientation and doping behaviour.
Petróczi A
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2007 Nov; 2():34. PubMed ID: 17996097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Australian athletes' knowledge of the WADA Prohibited Substances List and performance enhancing substances.
Orr R; Grassmayr M; Macniven R; Grunseit A; Halaki M; Bauman A
Int J Drug Policy; 2018 Jun; 56():40-45. PubMed ID: 29550541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Young athletes' awareness and monitoring of anti-doping in daily life: Does motivation matter?
Chan DK; Donovan RJ; Lentillon-Kaestner V; Hardcastle SJ; Dimmock JA; Keatley DA; Hagger MS
Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2015 Dec; 25(6):e655-63. PubMed ID: 25441263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are Athletes' Doping-Related Attitudes Predicted by Their Perceptions of Coaches' Confrontation Efficacy?
Sullivan P; Razavi P
Subst Use Misuse; 2017 Jul; 52(8):1098-1103. PubMed ID: 28429996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is there a danger for myopia in anti-doping education? Comparative analysis of substance use and misuse in Olympic racket sports calls for a broader approach.
Kondric M; Sekulic D; Petroczi A; Ostojic L; Rodek J; Ostojic Z
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2011 Oct; 6():27. PubMed ID: 21988896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Incongruence in doping related attitudes, beliefs and opinions in the context of discordant behavioural data: in which measure do we trust?
Petróczi A; Uvacsek M; Nepusz T; Deshmukh N; Shah I; Aidman EV; Barker J; Tóth M; Naughton DP
PLoS One; 2011 Apr; 6(4):e18804. PubMed ID: 21541317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Annual banned-substance review: analytical approaches in human sports drug testing.
Thevis M; Kuuranne T; Geyer H; Schänzer W
Drug Test Anal; 2010 Apr; 2(4):149-61. PubMed ID: 20376830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Moral Identity and Attitudes towards Doping in Sport: Whether Perception of Fair Play Matters.
Sukys S; Tilindiene I; Majauskiene D; Karanauskiene D
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Nov; 18(21):. PubMed ID: 34770044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
