214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25209595)
1. Long-term Outcome of Peripherally Implanted Venous Access Ports in the Forearm in Female Cancer Patients.
Klösges L; Meyer C; Boschewitz J; Andersson M; Rudlowski C; Schild HH; Wilhelm K
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2015 Jun; 38(3):657-64. PubMed ID: 25209595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Radiological placement of peripheral central venous access ports at the forearm. Technical results and long term outcome in 391 patients].
Lenhart M; Schätzler S; Manke C; Strotzer M; Seitz J; Gmeinwieser J; Völk M; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Herold T; Paetzel C
Rofo; 2010 Jan; 182(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 19536729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Follow-up of radiologically totally implanted central venous access ports of the upper arm: long-term complications in 127,750 catheter-days.
Busch JD; Herrmann J; Heller F; Derlin T; Koops A; Adam G; Habermann CR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Aug; 199(2):447-52. PubMed ID: 22826411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Peripherally placed totally implantable venous-access port systems of the forearm: clinical experience in 763 consecutive patients.
Goltz JP; Scholl A; Ritter CO; Wittenberg G; Hahn D; Kickuth R
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2010 Dec; 33(6):1159-67. PubMed ID: 20414657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Peripheral venous access ports: outcomes analysis in 109 patients.
Bodner LJ; Nosher JL; Patel KM; Siegel RL; Biswal R; Gribbin CE; Tokarz R
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2000; 23(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 10821892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The late complications of totally implantable central venous access ports: the results from an Italian multicenter prospective observation study.
Dal Molin A; Rasero L; Guerretta L; Perfetti E; Clerico M
Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2011 Dec; 15(5):377-81. PubMed ID: 21167777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Catheter fracture and embolization associated with arm implantation of the cook vital port.
Burbridge B; Stoneham G; Szkup P; Otani R; Kriegler S
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2013 Aug; 64(3):269-73. PubMed ID: 22867962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Experience with 100 consecutive central venous access arm ports placed by interventional radiologists.
Hills JR; Cardella JF; Cardella K; Waybill PN
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1997; 8(6):983-9. PubMed ID: 9399467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A retrospective analysis on the utility and complications of upper arm ports in 433 cases at a single institute.
Mori Y; Nagayama S; Kawamura J; Hasegawa S; Tanaka E; Okabe H; Takeuchi M; Sonobe M; Matsumoto S; Kanai M; Muto M; Chiba T; Sakai Y
Int J Clin Oncol; 2016 Jun; 21(3):474-82. PubMed ID: 26507141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Percutaneous implantation of peripherally inserted totally implantable venous access systems in the forearm in adolescent patients.
Augustin AM; Kertels O; Wiegering V; Thurner A; Kickuth R
Pediatr Radiol; 2022 Jul; 52(8):1550-1558. PubMed ID: 35368211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Subcutaneous venous port implantation in adult patients: a single center experience.
Cil BE; Canyiğit M; Peynircioğlu B; Hazirolan T; Carkaci S; Cekirge S; Balkanci F
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2006 Jun; 12(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 16752357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiologic placement of a low profile implantable venous access port in a pediatric population.
Nosher JL; Bodner LJ; Ettinger LJ; Siegel RL; Gribbin C; Asch J; Drachtman RA
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001; 24(6):395-9. PubMed ID: 11907746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Long-term outcomes and complications of upper arm central venous access ports].
Ide Y; Mikami K; Murata K
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2013 Mar; 40(3):331-5. PubMed ID: 23507594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Implantable catheter systems. Experiences with 1000 patients with central venous ports].
Kock HJ; Krause U; Pietsch M; Rasfeld S; Walz MK
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1996 Jan; 121(3):47-51. PubMed ID: 8565809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Polyurethane versus silicone catheters for central venous port devices implanted at the forearm.
Wildgruber M; Lueg C; Borgmeyer S; Karimov I; Braun U; Kiechle M; Meier R; Koehler M; Ettl J; Berger H
Eur J Cancer; 2016 May; 59():113-124. PubMed ID: 27023050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term central venous access with a peripherally placed subcutaneous infusion port: initial results.
Andrews JC; Walker-Andrews SC; Ensminger WD
Radiology; 1990 Jul; 176(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 2353108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implanting totally implantable venous access ports in the upper arm is feasible and safe for patients with early breast cancer.
Xu H; Chen R; Jiang C; You S; Zhu Q; Li Y; Li S; Zha X; Wang J
J Vasc Access; 2020 Sep; 21(5):609-614. PubMed ID: 31841061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Central venous access ports placed by interventional radiologists: experience with 125 consecutive patients.
Lorch H; Zwaan M; Kagel C; Weiss HD
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001; 24(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 11443406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of radiologically implanted central venous port systems explanted due to complications.
Teichgräber UK; Kausche S; Nagel SN
J Vasc Access; 2011; 12(4):306-12. PubMed ID: 21534232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term results of radiologic placement of a central vein access device.
Beheshti MV; Protzer WR; Tomlinson TL; Martinek E; Baatz LA; Collins MS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Mar; 170(3):731-4. PubMed ID: 9490964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
