174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25209996)
1. Comparison of the NMIJ and the ARPANSA standards for absorbed dose to water in high-energy photon beams.
Shimizu M; Morishita Y; Kato M; Tanaka T; Kurosawa T; Takata N; Saito N; Ramanathan G; Harty PD; Oliver C; Wright T; Butler DJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Apr; 164(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 25209996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Direct megavoltage photon calibration service in Australia.
Butler DJ; Ramanathan G; Oliver C; Cole A; Lye J; Harty PD; Wright T; Webb DV; Followill DS
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2014 Dec; 37(4):753-61. PubMed ID: 25146559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maintaining the accuracy of the (60)Co calibration service at the ARPANSA post source replacement in 2010.
Oliver C; Butler D; Webb D; Wright T; Lye J; Ramanathan G; Harty P; Takau V
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2015 Jun; 38(2):325-30. PubMed ID: 25749989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Direct calibration in megavoltage photon beams using Monte Carlo conversion factor: validation and clinical implications.
Wright T; Lye JE; Ramanathan G; Harty PD; Oliver C; Webb DV; Butler DJ
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(2):883-904. PubMed ID: 25565406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of Australian and Canadian calibration coefficients for air kerma and absorbed dose to water for 60Co gamma radiation.
Shortt KR; Huntley RB; Kotler LH; Boas JF; Webb DV
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2006 Jun; 29(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 16845927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Shift in absorbed dose for megavoltage photons when changing to TRS-398 in Australia.
Butler DJ; Palmans H; Webb DV; ;
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2005 Sep; 28(3):159-64. PubMed ID: 16250469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Primary Standard of Absorbed Dose to Water in High-energy Photon Beam Irradiation].
Shimizu M
Igaku Butsuri; 2014; 34(3):154-61. PubMed ID: 26288882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A standard for absorbed dose rate to water in a 60Co field using a graphite calorimeter at the National Metrology Institute of Japan.
Morishita Y; Kato M; Takata N; Kurosawa T; Tanaka T; Saito N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013; 154(3):331-9. PubMed ID: 22951998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of the BIPM calorimetric and ionometric standards in megavoltage photon beams to determine Wair and Ic.
Burns DT; Picard S; Kessler C; Roger P
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Mar; 59(6):1353-65. PubMed ID: 24583932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Absorbed-dose calibrations in high-energy photon beams at the National Physical Laboratory: conversion procedure.
Burns JE
Phys Med Biol; 1994 Oct; 39(10):1555-75. PubMed ID: 15551531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams: a comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and previous international codes of practice. International Atomic Energy Agency.
Andreo P; Huq MS; Westermark M; Song H; Tilikidis A; DeWerd L; Shortt K
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3033-53. PubMed ID: 12361209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Development of the 60Co gamma-ray standard field for therapy-level dosimeter calibration in terms of absorbed dose to water (N(D,w))].
Fukumura A; Mizuno H; Fukahori M; Sakata S
Igaku Butsuri; 2012; 32(4):182-8. PubMed ID: 24568023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetry study comparing NCS report-2 versus IAEA report TRS-398 for high energy photon beams.
Attalla EM; Khaled NE; Abou-Elenein HS; Elsayed AA
Gulf J Oncolog; 2008 Jan; (3):25-31. PubMed ID: 20084794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microionization chamber air-kerma calibration coefficients as a function of photon energy for x-ray spectra in the range of 20-250 kVp relative to 60Co.
Snow JR; Micka JA; DeWerd LA
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041711. PubMed ID: 23556881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The calibration of plane parallel ionisation chambers for the measurement of absorbed dose in electron beams of low to medium energies. Part 1: the NACP chamber.
Cross P; Freeman N
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1996 Sep; 19(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 8936730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spectral differences in 6 MV beams with matched PDDs and the effect on chamber response.
Lye JE; Butler DJ; Ramanathan G; Franich RD
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(22):7599-614. PubMed ID: 23103442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical reference dosimetry: comparison between AAPM TG-21 and TG-51 protocols.
Ding GX; Cygler JE; Kwok CB
Med Phys; 2000 Jun; 27(6):1217-25. PubMed ID: 10902550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams.
Med Phys; 1983; 10(6):741-71. PubMed ID: 6419029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Consistency in reference radiotherapy dosimetry: resolution of an apparent conundrum when (60)Co is the reference quality for charged-particle and photon beams.
Andreo P; Wulff J; Burns DT; Palmans H
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 58(19):6593-621. PubMed ID: 24018471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Proton dosimetry intercomparison based on the ICRU report 59 protocol.
Vatnitsky S; Moyers M; Miller D; Abell G; Slater JM; Pedroni E; Coray A; Mazal A; Newhauser W; Jaekel O; Heese J; Fukumura A; Futami Y; Verhey L; Daftari I; Grusell E; Molokanov A; Bloch C
Radiother Oncol; 1999 Jun; 51(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 10435822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
