174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25209996)
21. Determination of relative ion chamber calibration coefficients from depth-ionization measurements in clinical electron beams.
Muir BR; McEwen MR; Rogers DW
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Oct; 59(19):5953-69. PubMed ID: 25211012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. IPEM code of practice for high-energy photon therapy dosimetry based on the NPL absorbed dose calibration service.
Eaton DJ; Bass G; Booker P; Byrne J; Duane S; Frame J; Grattan M; Thomas RA; Thorp N; Nisbet A
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Sep; 65(19):195006. PubMed ID: 32503026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The relative response of NE2561 and NE2611A ionization chambers in megavoltage x-ray beams.
Boas JF; Huntley RB; Webb DV
Phys Med Biol; 2001 Dec; 46(12):3259-67. PubMed ID: 11768504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Absorbed dose to water determination with ionization chamber dosimetry and calorimetry in restricted neutron, photon, proton and heavy-ion radiation fields.
Brede HJ; Greif KD; Hecker O; Heeg P; Heese J; Jones DT; Kluge H; Schardt D
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Aug; 51(15):3667-82. PubMed ID: 16861773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Direct MC conversion of absorbed dose to graphite to absorbed dose to water for 60Co radiation.
Lye JE; Butler DJ; Franich RD; Harty PD; Oliver CP; Ramanathan G; Webb DV; Wright T
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jun; 155(1):100-9. PubMed ID: 23152147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Experimental determination of beam quality factors, kQ, for two types of Farmer chamber in a 10 MV photon and a 175 MeV proton beam.
Medin J; Ross CK; Klassen NV; Palmans H; Grusell E; Grindborg JE
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1503-21. PubMed ID: 16510959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The US radiation dosimetry standards for 60Co therapy level beams, and the transfer to the AAPM accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories.
Minniti R; Chen-Mayer H; Seltzer SM; Huq MS; Bryson L; Slowey T; Micka JA; DeWerd LA; Wells N; Hanson WF; Ibbott GS;
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1074-7. PubMed ID: 16696484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of linear accelerator photon outputs from the IAEA TRS-398 and TRS-277 codes of practice.
Fourie OL
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2008 Mar; 31(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 18488961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The 1998 Australian external beam radiotherapy survey and IAEA/WHO TLD postal dose quality audit.
Huntley R; Izewska J
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2000 Mar; 23(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 10921198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Establishment of 6- to 7-MeV high-energy gamma-ray calibration fields produced using the 4-MV Van de Graaff accelerator at the Facility of Radiation Standards, Japan Atomic Energy Agency.
Kowatari M; Tanimura Y
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Mar; 168(3):300-13. PubMed ID: 26012483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Point/Counterpoint. Calibration of radiotherapy ionization chambers using Co-60 is outdated and should be replaced by direct calibration in linear accelerator beams.
Ganesan R; McEwen MR; Orton CG
Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5003-6. PubMed ID: 26328950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Use of the FBX dosemeter for the calibration of cobalt-60 and high-energy teletherapy machines.
Gupta BL; Kini UR; Bhat RM; Madhvanath U
Phys Med Biol; 1982 Feb; 27(2):235-45. PubMed ID: 6803265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Australian radiation protection and nuclear safety agency megavoltage photon thermoluminescence dosimetry postal audit service 2007-2010.
Oliver CP; Butler DJ; Webb DV
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2012 Mar; 35(1):105-8. PubMed ID: 22302465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Experimental determination of pCo perturbation factors for plane-parallel chambers.
Kapsch RP; Bruggmoser G; Christ G; Dohm OS; Hartmann GH; Schüle E
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(23):7167-81. PubMed ID: 18030000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Re-evaluation of correction factors of a primary standard graphite calorimeter in 60Co gamma ray beams as a basis for the appointment of the BEV absorbed dose rate to water reference value.
Baumgartner A; Steurer A; Tiefenböck W; Gabris F; Maringer FJ; Kapsch RP; Stucki G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Apr; 145(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 21112889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Calorimetric determination of kQ factors for NE 2561 and NE 2571 ionization chambers in 5 cm x 5 cm and 10 cm x 10 cm radiotherapy beams of 8 MV and 16 MV photons.
Krauss A; Kapsch RP
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(20):6243-59. PubMed ID: 17921583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comment on "Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies".
Huq MS
Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):473-7; author reply 478-80. PubMed ID: 12674249
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Proposed definitions for isodose flatness and symmetry in clinical radiotherapy beams.
Galiano E; Joly T; Wiebe F
Appl Radiat Isot; 2004 Dec; 61(6):1361-6. PubMed ID: 15388134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dosimetry of clinical neutron and proton beams: an overview of recommendations.
Vynckier S; ;
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):565-72. PubMed ID: 15353710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Towards an optimum design of a P-MOS radiation detector for use in high-energy medical photon beams and neutron facilities: analysis of activation materials.
Price RA
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):386-90. PubMed ID: 16381751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
