BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25209996)

  • 41. An investigation of the response of a simple design of plane-parallel chamber.
    Ma CM; Knight RT; Nahum AE; Mayles WP
    Phys Med Biol; 1994 Oct; 39(10):1593-608. PubMed ID: 15551533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Analysis of physical parameters associated with the measurement of high-energy x-ray penumbra.
    Dawson DJ; Harper JM; Akinradewo AC
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(4):491-7. PubMed ID: 6434915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Non-reference condition correction factor kNR of typical radiation detectors applied for the dosimetry of high-energy photon fields in radiotherapy.
    Chofor N; Harder D; Poppe B
    Z Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 22(3):181-96. PubMed ID: 22658451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Flattening filter free beams in SBRT and IMRT: dosimetric assessment of peripheral doses.
    Kragl G; Baier F; Lutz S; Albrich D; Dalaryd M; Kroupa B; Wiezorek T; Knöös T; Georg D
    Z Med Phys; 2011 May; 21(2):91-101. PubMed ID: 20888199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Reference dosimetry on TomoTherapy: an addendum to the 1990 UK MV dosimetry code of practice.
    Thomas SJ; Aspradakis MM; Byrne JP; Chalmers G; Duane S; Rogers J; Thomas RA; Tudor GS; Twyman N;
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Mar; 59(6):1339-52. PubMed ID: 24583900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A methodology for TLD postal dosimetry audit of high-energy radiotherapy photon beams in non-reference conditions.
    Izewska J; Georg D; Bera P; Thwaites D; Arib M; Saravi M; Sergieva K; Li K; Yip FG; Mahant AK; Bulski W
    Radiother Oncol; 2007 Jul; 84(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 17628209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Dosimetric audits of photon beams in radiation therapy centres in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
    da Rosa LA; Brito RR; Gonçalves M; de Paiva E; Dovales AC; Freire BL; Giannoni RA; Di Prinzio R; Velasco AF; Castelo LH; Oliveira RV
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(2):272-5. PubMed ID: 18503063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Absorbed dose determination for high energy photon and electron beams at a PRIMUS linear accelerator using the documents DIN 6800-2 and TRS-398.
    Hartmann GH
    Z Med Phys; 2003; 13(4):241-50. PubMed ID: 14732953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of IPSM 1990 photon dosimetry code of practice with IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51.
    Castrillón SV; Henríquez FC
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 10(1):136-146. PubMed ID: 19223831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Radiotherapy Dosimeter Calibration for Absorbed Dose to Water Using Medical Accelerators].
    Shimizu M
    Igaku Butsuri; 2021; 41(3):134-142. PubMed ID: 34744124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Influence of monitor chamber calibration on virtual Wedge dosimetry.
    Malkoske KE; Nakonechny KD
    Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1185-92. PubMed ID: 17500449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Survey of 5 mm small-field output factor measurements in Australia.
    Oliver CP; Butler DJ; Takau V; Williams I
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):329-337. PubMed ID: 29368796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison between TG-51 and TG-21: Calibration of photon and electron beams in water using cylindrical chambers.
    Cho SH; Lowenstein JR; Balter PA; Wells NH; Hanson WF
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2000; 1(3):108-15. PubMed ID: 11674825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Quality assurance network in central Europe. External audit on output calibration for photon beams.
    Izewska J; Novotny J; Gwiazdowska B; Kindlova A; Kontra G; van Dam J; Dutreix A; van der Schueren E
    Acta Oncol; 1995; 34(6):829-38. PubMed ID: 7576752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of dosimetric standards of Canada and France for photons at 60Co and higher energies.
    Shortt K; Ross C; Seuntjens J; Delaunay F; Ostrowsky A; Gross P; Leroy E
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Aug; 46(8):2119-42. PubMed ID: 11512615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A comparison between calculated and experimental kQ photon beam quality correction factors.
    Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Sep; 45(9):L25-38. PubMed ID: 11008946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Constancy checks of well-type ionization chambers with external-beam radiation units.
    Hackett SL; Davis B; Nixon A; Wyatt R
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 16(6):508-514. PubMed ID: 26699571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of dose calibration by ionometric and chemical dosimetry for 6- and 45-MV x-ray beams.
    Zwicker RD; Wu A; Sternick ES
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(6):1251-3. PubMed ID: 1753913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Extrapolation chamber mounted on perspex for calibration of high energy photon and electron beams from a clinical linear accelerator.
    Ravichandran R; Binukumar JP; Sivakumar SS; Krishnamurthy K; Davis CA
    J Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 34(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 20126563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison between TG-51 and TRS-398: electron contamination effect on photon beam-quality specification.
    Lopez Medina A; Teijeiro A; Salvador F; Medal D; Vazquez J; Salgado M; Carrion MC
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jan; 49(1):17-32. PubMed ID: 14971770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.