These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25210160)

  • 1. Reach target selection in humans using ambiguous decision cues containing variable amounts of conflicting sensory evidence supporting each target choice.
    Coallier É; Kalaska JF
    J Neurophysiol; 2014 Dec; 112(11):2916-38. PubMed ID: 25210160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dorsal premotor cortex: neural correlates of reach target decisions based on a color-location matching rule and conflicting sensory evidence.
    Coallier É; Michelet T; Kalaska JF
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Jun; 113(10):3543-73. PubMed ID: 25787952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Autonomous mechanism of internal choice estimate underlies decision inertia.
    Akaishi R; Umeda K; Nagase A; Sakai K
    Neuron; 2014 Jan; 81(1):195-206. PubMed ID: 24333055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Macaque dorsal premotor cortex exhibits decision-related activity only when specific stimulus-response associations are known.
    Wang M; Montanède C; Chandrasekaran C; Peixoto D; Shenoy KV; Kalaska JF
    Nat Commun; 2019 Apr; 10(1):1793. PubMed ID: 30996222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rapid target foraging with reach or gaze: The hand looks further ahead than the eye.
    Diamond JS; Wolpert DM; Flanagan JR
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Jul; 13(7):e1005504. PubMed ID: 28683138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Precueing spatial S-R correspondence: is there regulation of expected response conflict?
    Wühr P; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):872-83. PubMed ID: 18665732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Task switching and shifting between stopping and going: Developmental change in between-trial control adjustments.
    Huizinga M; van der Molen MW
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Mar; 108(3):484-503. PubMed ID: 21092983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response competition and response inhibition during different choice-discrimination tasks: evidence from ERP measured inside MRI scanner.
    Gonzalez-Rosa JJ; Inuggi A; Blasi V; Cursi M; Annovazzi P; Comi G; Falini A; Leocani L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 23664841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Target selection in visual search as revealed by movement trajectories.
    Song JH; Nakayama K
    Vision Res; 2008 Mar; 48(7):853-61. PubMed ID: 18262583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A random-walk model of accuracy and reaction time applied to three experiments on pigeon visual discrimination.
    Blough DS
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Apr; 37(2):133-50. PubMed ID: 21517198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Serial correlation in lateralized choices of hand and target.
    Lee D; Schieber MH
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 174(3):499-509. PubMed ID: 16715180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of visual, auditory, and mixed cues on choice reaction in Parkinson's disease.
    Akamatsu T; Fukuyama H; Kawamata T
    J Neurol Sci; 2008 Jun; 269(1-2):118-25. PubMed ID: 18279895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The detection of various color combinations under different chromatic ambient illuminations.
    Neri DF; Luria SM; Kobus DA
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1986 Jun; 57(6):555-60. PubMed ID: 3718380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Goal-selection and movement-related conflict during bimanual reaching movements.
    Diedrichsen J; Grafton S; Albert N; Hazeltine E; Ivry RB
    Cereb Cortex; 2006 Dec; 16(12):1729-38. PubMed ID: 16400162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural correlates of evidence accumulation in a perceptual decision task.
    Liu T; Pleskac TJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2011 Nov; 106(5):2383-98. PubMed ID: 21849612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intermanual cross-talk effects in unimanual choice reactions.
    Heuer H; Kleinsorge T; Spijkers W; Steglich C
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Aug; 57(6):993-1018. PubMed ID: 15370513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human visual and parietal cortex encode visual choices independent of motor plans.
    Hebart MN; Donner TH; Haynes JD
    Neuroimage; 2012 Nov; 63(3):1393-403. PubMed ID: 22922368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response-selection conflict contributes to inhibition of return.
    Prime DJ; Jolicoeur P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 May; 21(5):991-9. PubMed ID: 18752398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of response grouping on free-choice decision making in a response selection task.
    Khan MA; Mourton S; Buckolz E; Adam JJ; Hayes AE
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jun; 134(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 20188342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence from a response choice task reveals a selection bias in the attentional cueing paradigm.
    Wilson DE; Pratt J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Nov; 126(3):216-25. PubMed ID: 17280639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.