BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25212061)

  • 1. Global fee prohibits postpartum provision of the most effective reversible contraceptives.
    Aiken AR; Creinin MD; Kaunitz AM; Nelson AL; Trussell J
    Contraception; 2014 Nov; 90(5):466-7. PubMed ID: 25212061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advocating for immediate postpartum LARC: increasing access, improving outcomes, and decreasing cost.
    Rodriguez MI; Evans M; Espey E
    Contraception; 2014 Nov; 90(5):468-71. PubMed ID: 25107639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decreasing Unintended Pregnancy with LARC.
    Hitt WC
    J Ark Med Soc; 2016 Feb; 112(10):180-1. PubMed ID: 26939469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception.
    Secura GM; Allsworth JE; Madden T; Mullersman JL; Peipert JF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Aug; 203(2):115.e1-7. PubMed ID: 20541171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Applying principles from behavioral economics to promote long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods.
    Stevens J; Berlan ED
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2014 Sep; 46(3):165-70. PubMed ID: 24588986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implantable contraceptives (subdermal implants and hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives: two systematic reviews to assess relative effectiveness, acceptability, tolerability and cost-effectiveness.
    French RS; Cowan FM; Mansour DJ; Morris S; Procter T; Hughes D; Robinson A; Guillebaud J
    Health Technol Assess; 2000; 4(7):i-vi, 1-107. PubMed ID: 10944741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-acting reversible contraceptives: intrauterine devices and the contraceptive implant.
    Espey E; Ogburn T
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 117(3):705-719. PubMed ID: 21343774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives and Adolescents: Assessing Benefits and Overcoming Barriers.
    McKnight ER; Berlan ED
    Adolesc Med State Art Rev; 2014 Aug; 25(2):347-59. PubMed ID: 27132318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Twelve-month contraceptive continuation and repeat pregnancy among young mothers choosing postdelivery contraceptive implants or postplacental intrauterine devices.
    Cohen R; Sheeder J; Arango N; Teal SB; Tocce K
    Contraception; 2016 Feb; 93(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 26475368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Practice Bulletin No. 186: Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Implants and Intrauterine Devices.
    Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology, Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Work Group
    Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 130(5):e251-e269. PubMed ID: 29064972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of the federal contraceptive coverage guarantee on out-of-pocket payments for contraceptives: 2014 update.
    Sonfield A; Tapales A; Jones RK; Finer LB
    Contraception; 2015 Jan; 91(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 25288034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contraceptive procedures.
    Beasley A; Schutt-Ainé A
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2013 Dec; 40(4):697-729. PubMed ID: 24286997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Game change in Colorado: widespread use of long-acting reversible contraceptives and rapid decline in births among young, low-income women.
    Ricketts S; Klingler G; Schwalberg R
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2014 Sep; 46(3):125-32. PubMed ID: 24961366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Increasing LARC utilization: any woman, any place, any time.
    Hathaway M; Torres L; Vollett-Krech J; Wohltjen H
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 57(4):718-30. PubMed ID: 25314089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Regulatory Science to Promote Access to Intrauterine Systems for Women in the United States.
    Sharan S; Wang Y; Donnelly M; Zou Y; Fang L; Kim MJ; Zhao L
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2020 Dec; 60 Suppl 2():S34-S38. PubMed ID: 33274507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Postpartum contraception: initiation and effectiveness in a large universal healthcare system.
    Brunson MR; Klein DA; Olsen CH; Weir LF; Roberts TA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):55.e1-55.e9. PubMed ID: 28257962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Helping patients select long-acting reversible contraceptives.
    Sierra T
    JAAPA; 2019 Apr; 32(4):23-27. PubMed ID: 30913144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The cost-effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods in the UK: analysis based on a decision-analytic model developed for a National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) clinical practice guideline.
    Mavranezouli I;
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Jun; 23(6):1338-45. PubMed ID: 18372257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pills are not enough: the case for long-acting reversible contraceptives--and how North Carolinians can benefit.
    Bryant A; Kovar CL; Luchowski AT
    N C Med J; 2009; 70(5):459-62. PubMed ID: 19999530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Committee Opinion No. 670 Summary: Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 128(2):422-423. PubMed ID: 27454730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.