These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25212384)

  • 1. A review of Doppler ultrasound quality assurance protocols and test devices.
    Browne JE
    Phys Med; 2014 Nov; 30(7):742-51. PubMed ID: 25212384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An audit of a hospital-based Doppler ultrasound quality control protocol using a commercial string Doppler phantom.
    Cournane S; Fagan AJ; Browne JE
    Phys Med; 2014 May; 30(3):380-4. PubMed ID: 24156827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of a sensitivity performance index test protocol and evaluation of colour Doppler sensitivity for a range of ultrasound scanners.
    Browne JE; Watson AJ; Hoskins PR; Elliott AT
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Nov; 30(11):1475-83. PubMed ID: 15588958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Functional properties of diagnostic ultrasound instruments. A concept of trial building blocks for implementing quality assurance].
    Trier HG
    Ultraschall Med; 1994 Oct; 15(5):223-32. PubMed ID: 7801092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The Doppler Simulator DS 81. A new calibration method for ultrasound-cw-Doppler blood flow measurement devices].
    Reuter R; Trier HG
    Ultraschall Med; 1983 Sep; 4(3):188-91. PubMed ID: 6227994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MO-D-218-01: Overview of Methodology and Standards (QIBA, IEC, AIUM and AAPM).
    Carson P
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part21):3869-3870. PubMed ID: 28518282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Technical Note: A new phantom design for routine testing of Doppler ultrasound.
    Grice JV; Pickens DR; Price RR
    Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4431. PubMed ID: 27370158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [A test object for quality control of the instrument for doppler (duplex) ultrasonography, based on the Draft IEC 61685 Standard].
    Kollmann C; Bezemer RA; Fredfeldt KE; Schaarschmidt UG; Teirlinck CJ
    Ultraschall Med; 1999 Dec; 20(6):248-57. PubMed ID: 10670070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Objective performance testing and quality assurance of medical ultrasound equipment.
    Thijssen JM; Weijers G; de Korte CL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 33(3):460-71. PubMed ID: 17275983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An open source automatic quality assurance (OSAQA) tool for the ACR MRI phantom.
    Sun J; Barnes M; Dowling J; Menk F; Stanwell P; Greer PB
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2015 Mar; 38(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 25412885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance tests of Doppler ultrasound equipment with a string phantom.
    Goldstein A
    J Ultrasound Med; 1991 Mar; 10(3):125-39. PubMed ID: 2027183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The leicester Doppler phantom--a digital electronic phantom for ultrasound pulsed Doppler system testing.
    Gittins J; Martin K
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Apr; 36(4):647-55. PubMed ID: 20350689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A rotating cylinder phantom for flow and tissue color Doppler testing.
    Walker A; Henriksen E; Ringqvist I; Ask P
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1892-8. PubMed ID: 19713031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of spectral Doppler flow and tissue velocity measurements in ultrasound systems.
    Walker A; Olsson E; Wranne B; Ringqvist I; Ask P
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Jan; 30(1):127-32. PubMed ID: 14962617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A velocity evaluation phantom for colour and pulsed Doppler instruments.
    Rickey DW; Rankin R; Fenster A
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1992; 18(5):479-94. PubMed ID: 1509623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality assurance of ultrasound systems: current status and review of literature.
    Grazhdani H; David E; Ventura Spagnolo O; Buemi F; Perri A; Orsogna N; Gigli S; Chimenz R
    J Ultrasound; 2018 Sep; 21(3):173-182. PubMed ID: 29949119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Doppler signal: where does it come from and what does it mean?
    Nelson TR; Pretorius DH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Sep; 151(3):439-47. PubMed ID: 2970215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of the AIUM/NEMA, IEC and FDA (1980) definitions of various acoustic output parameters for ultrasonic transducers.
    Livett AJ; Preston RC
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1985; 11(6):793-802. PubMed ID: 4095794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A programmable Doppler string test object.
    Russell SV; McHugh D; Moreman BR
    Phys Med Biol; 1993 Nov; 38(11):1623-30. PubMed ID: 8272437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality assurance needs for modern image-based radiotherapy: recommendations from 2007 interorganizational symposium on "quality assurance of radiation therapy: challenges of advanced technology".
    Williamson JF; Dunscombe PB; Sharpe MB; Thomadsen BR; Purdy JA; Deye JA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008; 71(1 Suppl):S2-12. PubMed ID: 18406928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.