301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25212571)
1. A single-field integrated boost treatment planning technique for spot scanning proton therapy.
Zhu XR; Poenisch F; Li H; Zhang X; Sahoo N; Wu RY; Li X; Lee AK; Chang EL; Choi S; Pugh T; Frank SJ; Gillin MT; Mahajan A; Grosshans DR
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Sep; 9():202. PubMed ID: 25212571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated proton therapy optimization techniques for pediatric craniopharyngiomas: a clinical case study.
Yeung D; McKenzie C; Indelicato DJ
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2014 Jan; 61(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 24000229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preliminary evaluation of multifield and single-field optimization for the treatment planning of spot-scanning proton therapy of head and neck cancer.
Quan EM; Liu W; Wu R; Li Y; Frank SJ; Zhang X; Zhu XR; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081709. PubMed ID: 23927306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Energy layer optimization strategies for intensity-modulated proton therapy of lung cancer patients.
Jensen MF; Hoffmann L; Petersen JBB; Møller DS; Alber M
Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4355-4363. PubMed ID: 30129041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of prostate proton treatment planning technique, interfraction robustness, and analysis of single-field treatment feasibility.
Kirk ML; Tang S; Zhai H; Vapiwala N; Deville C; James P; Bekelman JE; Christodouleas JP; Tochner Z; Both S
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2015; 5(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 25413411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Integrated beam orientation and scanning-spot optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy for brain and unilateral head and neck tumors.
Gu W; O'Connor D; Nguyen D; Yu VY; Ruan D; Dong L; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1338-1350. PubMed ID: 29394454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improve the dosimetric outcome in bilateral head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy: a feasibility study.
Liu G; Li X; Qin A; Zheng W; Yan D; Zhang S; Stevens C; Kabolizadeh P; Ding X
Radiat Oncol; 2020 Jan; 15(1):21. PubMed ID: 32000817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Technical Note: Treatment planning system (TPS) approximations matter - comparing intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plan quality and robustness between a commercial and an in-house developed TPS for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Liu C; Yu NY; Shan J; Bhangoo RS; Daniels TB; Chiang JS; Ding X; Lara P; Patrick CL; Archuleta JP; DeWees T; Hu Y; Schild SE; Bues M; Sio TT; Liu W
Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):4755-4762. PubMed ID: 31498885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of linear and nonlinear programming approaches for "worst case dose" and "minmax" robust optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy dose distributions.
Zaghian M; Cao W; Liu W; Kardar L; Randeniya S; Mohan R; Lim G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):15-25. PubMed ID: 28300378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multi-scenario based robust intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans can account for set-up errors more effectively in terms of normal tissue sparing than planning target volume (PTV) based intensity-modulated photon plans in the head and neck region.
Stuschke M; Kaiser A; Abu Jawad J; Pöttgen C; Levegrün S; Farr J
Radiat Oncol; 2013 Jun; 8():145. PubMed ID: 23773560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of organ-at-risk sparing and plan robustness for spot-scanning proton therapy and volumetric modulated arc photon therapy in head-and-neck cancer.
Barten DL; Tol JP; Dahele M; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6589-98. PubMed ID: 26520750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric impact of systematic spot position errors in spot scanning proton therapy of head and neck tumor.
Yasui K; Omi Y; Shimomura A; Muramatsu R; Iwata H; Ogino H; Hayashi N
J Cancer Res Ther; 2023 Apr; 19(Supplement):S0. PubMed ID: 37147973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Photon and proton therapy planning comparison for malignant glioma based on CT, FDG-PET, DTI-MRI and fiber tracking.
Munck Af Rosenschöld P; Engelholm S; Ohlhues L; Law I; Vogelius I; Engelholm SA
Acta Oncol; 2011 Aug; 50(6):777-83. PubMed ID: 21767174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetric comparison of distal esophageal carcinoma plans for patients treated with small-spot intensity-modulated proton versus volumetric-modulated arc therapies.
Liu C; Bhangoo RS; Sio TT; Yu NY; Shan J; Chiang JS; Ding JX; Rule WG; Korte S; Lara P; Ding X; Bues M; Hu Y; DeWees T; Ashman JB; Liu W
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 20(7):15-27. PubMed ID: 31112371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Role of Plan Robustness Evaluation in Comparing Protons and Photons Plans - An Application on IMPT and IMRT Plans in Skull Base Chordomas.
Noufal MP; Widesott L; Sharma SD; Righetto R; Cianchetti M; Schwarz M
J Med Phys; 2020; 45(4):206-214. PubMed ID: 33953495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An Analysis of Plan Robustness for Esophageal Tumors: Comparing Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Plans and Spot Scanning Proton Planning.
Warren S; Partridge M; Bolsi A; Lomax AJ; Hurt C; Crosby T; Hawkins MA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):199-207. PubMed ID: 27084641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of intrafraction prostate motion on proton pencil beam scanning delivery: a quantitative assessment.
Tang S; Deville C; McDonough J; Tochner Z; Wang KK; Vapiwala N; Both S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Oct; 87(2):375-82. PubMed ID: 23958148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric and radiobiological impact of intensity modulated proton therapy and RapidArc planning for high-risk prostate cancer with seminal vesicles.
Rana S; Cheng C; Zhao L; Park S; Larson G; Vargas C; Dunn M; Zheng Y
J Med Radiat Sci; 2017 Mar; 64(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 27741379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Superiority in Robustness of Multifield Optimization Over Single-Field Optimization for Pencil-Beam Proton Therapy for Oropharynx Carcinoma: An Enhanced Robustness Analysis.
Stützer K; Lin A; Kirk M; Lin L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Nov; 99(3):738-749. PubMed ID: 29280468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intensity modulated proton therapy for craniospinal irradiation: organ-at-risk exposure and a low-gradient junctioning technique.
Stoker JB; Grant J; Zhu XR; Pidikiti R; Mahajan A; Grosshans DR
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Nov; 90(3):637-44. PubMed ID: 25194667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
