These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25212739)

  • 1. A comparison of kinematic algorithms to estimate gait events during overground running.
    Smith L; Preece S; Mason D; Bramah C
    Gait Posture; 2015 Jan; 41(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 25212739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A kinematic algorithm to identify gait events during running at different speeds and with different footstrike types.
    Handsaker JC; Forrester SE; Folland JP; Black MI; Allen SJ
    J Biomech; 2016 Dec; 49(16):4128-4133. PubMed ID: 27814970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of methods for kinematic identification of footstrike and toe-off during overground and treadmill running.
    Fellin RE; Rose WC; Royer TD; Davis IS
    J Sci Med Sport; 2010 Nov; 13(6):646-50. PubMed ID: 20478742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic identification of gait events during walking on uneven surfaces.
    Eckardt N; Kibele A
    Gait Posture; 2017 Feb; 52():83-86. PubMed ID: 27888695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determination of toe-off event time during treadmill locomotion using kinematic data.
    De Witt JK
    J Biomech; 2010 Nov; 43(15):3067-9. PubMed ID: 20801452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel kinematic detection of foot-strike and toe-off events during noninstrumented treadmill running to estimate contact time.
    Patoz A; Lussiana T; Gindre C; Malatesta D
    J Biomech; 2021 Nov; 128():110737. PubMed ID: 34517256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A kinematic method to detect foot contact during running for all foot strike patterns.
    Milner CE; Paquette MR
    J Biomech; 2015 Sep; 48(12):3502-5. PubMed ID: 26283411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development and validation of FootNet; a new kinematic algorithm to improve foot-strike and toe-off detection in treadmill running.
    Rivadulla A; Chen X; Weir G; Cazzola D; Trewartha G; Hamill J; Preatoni E
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0248608. PubMed ID: 34370747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phase determination during normal running using kinematic data.
    Hreljac A; Stergiou N
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2000 Sep; 38(5):503-6. PubMed ID: 11094805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Initial contact and toe off event identification for rearfoot and non-rearfoot strike pattern treadmill running at different speeds.
    King DL; McCartney M; Trihy E
    J Biomech; 2019 Jun; 90():119-122. PubMed ID: 31076169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two simple methods for determining gait events during treadmill and overground walking using kinematic data.
    Zeni JA; Richards JG; Higginson JS
    Gait Posture; 2008 May; 27(4):710-4. PubMed ID: 17723303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Five Kinematic-Based Identification Methods of Foot Contact Events During Treadmill Walking and Running at Different Speeds.
    Alvim F; Cerqueira L; Netto AD; Leite G; Muniz A
    J Appl Biomech; 2015 Oct; 31(5):383-8. PubMed ID: 25950421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Footstrike patterns among novice runners wearing a conventional, neutral running shoe.
    Bertelsen ML; Jensen JF; Nielsen MH; Nielsen RO; Rasmussen S
    Gait Posture; 2013 Jun; 38(2):354-6. PubMed ID: 23280125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of three methods in gait event detection during overground running.
    Mo S; Chow DHK
    Gait Posture; 2018 Jan; 59():93-98. PubMed ID: 29028626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treadmill vs. overground running gait during childhood: a qualitative and quantitative analysis.
    Rozumalski A; Novacheck TF; Griffith CJ; Walt K; Schwartz MH
    Gait Posture; 2015 Feb; 41(2):613-8. PubMed ID: 25662042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of lower extremity kinematic curves during overground and treadmill running.
    Fellin RE; Manal K; Davis IS
    J Appl Biomech; 2010 Nov; 26(4):407-14. PubMed ID: 21245500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment and validation of a simple automated method for the detection of gait events and intervals.
    Ghoussayni S; Stevens C; Durham S; Ewins D
    Gait Posture; 2004 Dec; 20(3):266-72. PubMed ID: 15531173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical effects following footstrike pattern modification using wearable sensors.
    Chan PPK; Chan ZYS; Au IPH; Lam BMF; Lam WK; Cheung RTH
    J Sci Med Sport; 2021 Jan; 24(1):30-35. PubMed ID: 32553447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of the performance of 17 algorithms from a systematic review: Influence of sensor position, analysed variable and computational approach in gait timing estimation from IMU measurements.
    Pacini Panebianco G; Bisi MC; Stagni R; Fantozzi S
    Gait Posture; 2018 Oct; 66():76-82. PubMed ID: 30170137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting gait events from tibial acceleration in rearfoot running: A structured machine learning approach.
    Robberechts P; Derie R; Van den Berghe P; Gerlo J; De Clercq D; Segers V; Davis J
    Gait Posture; 2021 Feb; 84():87-92. PubMed ID: 33285383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.