These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25212977)

  • 21. Maternal preference for cesarean delivery: do women get what they want?
    Fuglenes D; Aas E; Botten G; Øian P; Kristiansen IS
    Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Aug; 120(2 Pt 1):252-60. PubMed ID: 22825082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Behind the myth--few women prefer caesarean section in the absence of medical or obstetrical factors.
    Karlström A; Nystedt A; Johansson M; Hildingsson I
    Midwifery; 2011 Oct; 27(5):620-7. PubMed ID: 20630634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Why women request cesarean section without medical indication?
    Dursun P; Yanik FB; Zeyneloglu HB; Baser E; Kuscu E; Ayhan A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Sep; 24(9):1133-7. PubMed ID: 21668323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A study on personal mode of delivery among Chinese obstetrician-gynecologists, midwives and nurses.
    Ouyang YQ; Zhang Q
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jan; 287(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 22907794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Strength of preference for vaginal birth as a predictor of delivery mode among women who attempt a vaginal delivery.
    Wu E; Kaimal AJ; Houston K; Yee LM; Nakagawa S; Kuppermann M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 May; 210(5):440.e1-6. PubMed ID: 24246523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparative study of the experience of childbirth between women who preferred and had a caesarean section and women who preferred and had a vaginal birth.
    Karlström A; Nystedt A; Hildingsson I
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2011 Aug; 2(3):93-9. PubMed ID: 21742287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Change of childbirth preference after delivery among nulliparous Chinese women and their partners.
    Li WY; Liabsuetrakul T; Stray-Pedersen B
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Jan; 40(1):184-91. PubMed ID: 24102777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Delivery route preferences of urban women of low socioeconomic status.
    Kudish B; Mehta S; Kruger M; Russell E; Sokol RJ
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 Oct; 111(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 20579999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Caesarean section at maternal request--the differing views of patients and healthcare professionals: a questionnaire based study.
    Sharpe AN; Waring GJ; Rees J; McGarry K; Hinshaw K
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Sep; 192():54-60. PubMed ID: 26151240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Maternal expectations and birth-related experiences: a survey of pregnant women of mixed parity from Calcutta, India.
    Hug I; Chattopadhyay C; Mitra GR; Kar Mahapatra RM; Schneider MC
    Int J Obstet Anesth; 2008 Apr; 17(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 18295472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mode of delivery at periviable gestational ages: impact on subsequent reproductive outcomes.
    Lannon SM; Guthrie KA; Reed SD; Gammill HS
    J Perinat Med; 2013 Nov; 41(6):691-7. PubMed ID: 23924520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Non-medical determinants of cesarean section in a medically dominated maternity system.
    Dweik D; Girasek E; Mészáros G; Töreki A; Keresztúri A; Pál A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Oct; 93(10):1025-33. PubMed ID: 25066090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Preferences and concerns for delivery: an antepartum survey.
    Bracken JN; Dryfhout VL; Goldenhar LM; Pauls RN
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1527-31. PubMed ID: 18633559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Six-week retention after postplacental copper intrauterine device placement.
    Colwill AC; Schreiber CA; Sammel MD; Sonalkar S
    Contraception; 2018 Mar; 97(3):215-218. PubMed ID: 29128372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fear of Childbirth and Preference for Cesarean Delivery Among Young American Women Before Childbirth: A Survey Study.
    Stoll K; Edmonds JK; Hall WA
    Birth; 2015 Sep; 42(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 26104997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. US nulliparas' perceptions of roles and of the birth experience as predictors of their delivery preferences.
    Arcia A
    Midwifery; 2013 Aug; 29(8):885-94. PubMed ID: 23415361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study.
    Liu NH; Mazzoni A; Zamberlin N; Colomar M; Chang OH; Arnaud L; Althabe F; Belizán JM
    Reprod Health; 2013 Jan; 10(1):2. PubMed ID: 23317141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mode of delivery and postpartum emotional distress: a cohort study of 55,814 women.
    Adams SS; Eberhard-Gran M; Sandvik ÅR; Eskild A
    BJOG; 2012 Feb; 119(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 22082191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cesarean section: does it really prevent the development of postpartum stress urinary incontinence? A prospective study of 363 women one year after their first delivery.
    Groutz A; Rimon E; Peled S; Gold R; Pauzner D; Lessing JB; Gordon D
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2004; 23(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 14694448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Postpartum maternal mortality and cesarean delivery.
    Deneux-Tharaux C; Carmona E; Bouvier-Colle MH; Bréart G
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):541-8. PubMed ID: 16946213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.