358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25212989)
1. Outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty with the use of trabecular metal cone for reconstruction of severe bone loss at the proximal tibia.
Jensen CL; Winther N; Schrøder HM; Petersen MM
Knee; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1233-7. PubMed ID: 25212989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty: a five to nine-year follow-up.
Kamath AF; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Feb; 97(3):216-23. PubMed ID: 25653322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment of large bone defects with trabecular metal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty: short term clinical and radiographic outcomes.
Derome P; Sternheim A; Backstein D; Malo M
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jan; 29(1):122-6. PubMed ID: 23702265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement.
Meneghini RM; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Jan; 90(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 18171960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement. Surgical technique.
Meneghini RM; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Mar; 91 Suppl 2 Pt 1():131-8. PubMed ID: 19255205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bone mineral density changes of the proximal tibia after revision total knee arthroplasty. A randomised study with the use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones.
Jensen CL; Petersen MM; Schrøder HM; Lund B
Int Orthop; 2012 Sep; 36(9):1857-63. PubMed ID: 22733440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Excellent mid- to long-term survival of tantalum metal cones in a case series of revision knee arthroplasty with severe bony defects.
Eder-Halbedl M; Fink A; Pietsch M; Djahani O; Hofmann S
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 Dec; 31(12):5496-5506. PubMed ID: 37819600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-year follow up utilizing tantal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty.
Schmitz HC; Klauser W; Citak M; Al-Khateeb H; Gehrke T; Kendoff D
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Oct; 28(9):1556-60. PubMed ID: 23664075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tantalum cones for major osteolysis in revision knee replacement.
Rao BM; Kamal TT; Vafaye J; Moss M
Bone Joint J; 2013 Aug; 95-B(8):1069-74. PubMed ID: 23908422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Midterm Results of Porous Tantalum Femoral Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Potter GD; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Aug; 98(15):1286-91. PubMed ID: 27489319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Management of bone loss: augments, cones, offset stems.
Radnay CS; Scuderi GR
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 May; 446():83-92. PubMed ID: 16672876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Total knee arthroplasty revision with trabecular tantalum cones: Preliminary retrospective study of 51 patients from two centres with a minimal 2-year follow-up.
Girerd D; Parratte S; Lunebourg A; Boureau F; Ollivier M; Pasquier G; Putman S; Migaud H; Argenson JN
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Jun; 102(4):429-33. PubMed ID: 27052939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Short-term Outcomes of 3D-Printed Titanium Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Remily EA; Dávila Castrodad IM; Mohamed NS; Wilkie WA; Kelemen MN; Delanois RE
Orthopedics; 2021 Jan; 44(1):43-47. PubMed ID: 33284980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Early results of the use of tantalum femoral cones for revision total knee arthroplasty.
Howard JL; Kudera J; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Mar; 93(5):478-84. PubMed ID: 21368080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Revision knee arthroplasty due to aseptic loosening].
Rozkydal Z; Janík P; Janícek P; Kunovský R
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 17331449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tantalum Cones Provide Durable Mid-term Fixation in Revision TKA.
De Martino I; De Santis V; Sculco PK; D'Apolito R; Assini JB; Gasparini G
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 473(10):3176-82. PubMed ID: 25968895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Porous tantalum cones for large metaphyseal tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: a minimum 2-year follow-up.
Long WJ; Scuderi GR
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Oct; 24(7):1086-92. PubMed ID: 18823749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Addressing large tibial osseous defects in primary total knee arthroplasty using porous tantalum cones.
You JS; Wright AR; Hasegawa I; Kobayashi B; Kawahara M; Wang J; Nakasone CK
Knee; 2019 Jan; 26(1):228-239. PubMed ID: 30554910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. No Difference Between Trabecular Metal Cones and Femoral Head Allografts in Revision TKA: Minimum 5-year Followup.
Sandiford NA; Misur P; Garbuz DS; Greidanus NV; Masri BA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jan; 475(1):118-124. PubMed ID: 27287857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Porous metal cones: gold standard for massive bone loss in complex revision knee arthroplasty? A systematic review of current literature.
Divano S; Cavagnaro L; Zanirato A; Basso M; Felli L; Formica M
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2018 Jun; 138(6):851-863. PubMed ID: 29671089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
